- Jul 25, 2016
- 4,840
- 3,327
I had a similar thought so I went to capfriendly, and if they are to be believed, the long term contracts are not ironclad. The M-NMC provisions do not kick in til next year and even then they are 5 team no trade lists. Thus I think locked in is not quite true With the exception of Skinner. So without limiting the discussion to those perceived to be entrenched, I think the universe of possible moves expands. I also think it was by design that it is very possible to move those long term commitments in the future. I would start any analysis with the full universe of players and go from there.I think it’s pretty funny with all your rants today. You still don’t grasp our main problem is those 5 players and Tuch wilting under the pressure of expectations. It’s their first time experiencing being the top dogs on a team with playoff expectations. They haven’t met the moment at all.
But you’re open to trading one of the guys who hasn’t wilted (Mitts/Joker/Peterka). Is it because it’s easier to pretend the locked in core isn’t the problem?
It’s been amazing reading all the rants and seeing very few posters talking about it. It’s killed us all season.