Mattilaus
Registered User
You joke but I am pretty sure he did advocate for overpaying to bring in Reeves a couple weeks or months ago.Has he proposed trading for Ryan Reeves?
You joke but I am pretty sure he did advocate for overpaying to bring in Reeves a couple weeks or months ago.Has he proposed trading for Ryan Reeves?
Just speaking from my POV.Can someone explain to me how getting a couple of Matt Martins or *insert minimally skilled plug who hits people* fixes the problem of the team being poorly coached and drilled and players having no idea what they are supposed to be doing and constantly being in the wrong position?
Then there is another aspect that seems to get left out, and that's the idea of pulling a team into the fight. Guys who hit often will engage the crowd at home. It can be infectious, drawing one's teammates into things. Competitive people get their blood up and it builds on itself. So for a team that struggles to have the fans engaged, in a town that absolutely adores the physical side of the game, to have the team essentially completely ignore the physical part of the sport is self-hobbling. They don't get the fans out of their seats on a big hit, they don't get the other team off their game looking for revenge, and they don't get their sleepy asses into the game right away. From a fan support standpoint, embrace the dumb. Embrace the barstool guy who is always complaining about some player not hitting or being tough or whatever by giving them some of those guys who are very much that to keep those folks engaged and entertained while the high-skill guys can go do their thing.
Tage Thompson post game "We just have to lock out all the outside noise"
wtf is he talking about, who is he blaming, and for what ?
Total guess work but im assuming instagram comments etc.
The booing after his terrible backchecking efforts might bruise his ego.
I can't like your post enough, but this point especially.
This team only really gets engaged when they're desperate (which isn't often), sometimes after they've been embarrassed, or when the other team tries to run them over (again, sometimes there's some pushback).
This isn't just a Sabres problem, it happens to skill players all around the league. Even the biggest stars in the league sleepwalk through entire games. Energy and high compete players often drag their teams into the fight when it's not naturally there at the start. PSA - these guys often suck at the skills portion of the game of hockey, but they bring an element to the team that aren't in the charts.
I'm going to be annoying repetitive while clamoring for Duhaime this entire offseason.
It is very odd. Anytime anybody whether it be it fans, reporters, or social media says "The Sabres aren't good enough at..." they team collectively responds with "Hey stop picking on me. Everything we are doing is good enough".
I don't think they are complacent as much as they are sheltered, stubborn, and to an extent entitled.
They legitimately believe that they are a good hockey team, all their prep is on point, they way they play and practice is the right way, effort is through the roof, and their skills are where they need to be. They also seem to think anybody who slightly contradicts this is a the enemy.
Just my $0.02 as somebody who has done some work with the USOC. When I have taken over for This stuff generally comes from long term inadequate coaching built around the personality of one coach. This can be really hard to overcome for their replacement.
I think there's a couple prevailing philosophies regarding roster construction for the current Sabres.
Reinforcements
Major roster change
I'm primarily for the latter, which is why I'm advocating for the Tkachuk trade. As @OkimLom pointed out, there's not enough fight in the team DNA. The price is steep, but you insert someone like Tkachuk into this roster, and you've significantly altered the team.
Take the trade I proposed and look at the NHL roster afterwards, just prior to free agency:
Tkachuk - Thompson - Tuch
Quinn - Cozens - Benson
Skinner - Krebs - Greenway
Girgensons (re-signs) - xxx - xxx
Power - Dahlin
Byrum - Samuelsson
Johnson - Clifton
But I'm also for the former, as @Chainshot pointed out. Take the remaining two spots and go get some sandpaper. Sign one of Carrier, Joshua, Trenin, or Duhaime. Go with Carrier since almost all of us are familiar with his game. Make a trade with San Jose for Nico Sturm. Now re-look the forwards
Tkachuk - Thompson - Tuch
Quinn - Cozens - Benson
Skinner - Krebs - Greenway
Girgensons - Sturm - Carrier
That's a big difference.
I would like to inquire about Sam Bennet. Fla needs to jump through some hoops and may need the space and are low on picks. On a decent deal for a year and should be motivated for a last contract.I would point out that Sturm is not at all a sandpaper guy. Good defensively? Sure. But he's not at all sandy.
I have a very hard time believing an entire roster's worth of guys were able to make it to this level without skills a high school player is expected to have. If an entire roster looks like they have no idea what they are doing it points the finger in one direction.Hockey isn't football -- the coach isn't giving them routes to run. They're supposed to know the basic shit that you're describing. A lot of it is on the dumbass players who were all so skilled coming up that their coaches probably let them do whatever.
The coach sucks and needs to go, but the way these guys are in the wrong position so much goes well beyond bad coaching.
Sure, that's true. I was going for a defensive and grit line, and Sturm was more on the defensive side. I think that type of line works.I would point out that Sturm is not at all a sandpaper guy. Good defensively? Sure. But he's not at all sandy.
Tkachuk addition would be a dream. Krebs/Savoie middle six would be the nightmare.Sure, that's true. I was going for a defensive and grit line, and Sturm was more on the defensive side. I think that type of line works.
There's another variation of that forward group where Savoie makes an impact early on, similar to Point's first NHL season, and he's in the center discussion.
If I had everything, though, which includes the Tkachuk trade, Savoie doing well, and some free agent signings, it'd look more like this:
Tkachuk - Thompson - Benson
Quinn - Krebs - Tuch
Greenway - Savoie - Cozens
Skinner - Sturm - Girgensons or Carrier
I tend to believe that those injuries actually exposed how deficient the coaching is.They need to stop focusing on what to say to the media or addressing opinions that they obviously disregard and focus on action we don't need our guys to be good in interviews we need them to to be good on the ice and stop having everyone in the orginaztion care about media or having a feel good response or pretty words to put us at ease it's at the point where we don't care if you are trying just do. Good locker room vibes was last years storyline, what's this year's? I know they had reasons for a less than optimal year with Quinn and tage's injury but no excuses they all need to go into the off-season agitated not disappointed. This group of players live and die by granato apparently so why didn't they play like it they need to be dissatisfied with the results, which I am sure they are probably taking it the worst, and the effort they put in if they gave their best every night they need to realize their best wasn't good enough and need to be better. I don't mean just skating hard or battle tirelessly on the boards, we need that too, but rather dialed in before puck drop. Do we have a sports psychiatrist? If not we should get one so these guys get help for staying focused and help sharpen mentality come game time. One thing I noticed is that a lot of guys at times seem to be in their head and doing to much thinking we need to play instinctively while aware to much puck watching on defense so many times you'll see 3-4 guys just focused on the puck carrier anticipating his moves meanwhile someone is sliding right into the slot. They need to trust eachother on defense and trust that their guy has their guy and stay in position we get chaotic and end up collapsing. /End rant
SLC is beautiful, the religious aspects are rampantI imagine some players might not want to move to Utah. Some interesting players could shake loose there.
SLC is VERY, VERY different from the rest of Utah. I don't think it'll be an issue at all.I imagine some players might not want to move to Utah. Some interesting players could shake loose there.
To succeed in the playoffs, I agree.Just speaking from my POV.
There's more that's wrong with the team IMO, than just the coaching level and execution of playing hockey. There's a massive issue with the "DNA" of what is a Sabres player in terms of fight in their game. There are guys that have it (Benson, Greenway). But the team needs an injection of those sort of players, especially if it's not going to be a core attribute we are drafting towards.
Challenge accepted...and I'll raise him a Conn SmytheAt least get a picture of O'Reilly with the cup...
you still have to go to a private club to drink alcohol right ?SLC is VERY, VERY different from the rest of Utah. I don't think it'll be an issue at all.
If they are mad about having to move from Phoenix to SLC, I am sure they would be thrilled with a trade to Buffalo.Looks like it’s the perfect time to help Salt Lake acquire a proven star NHL goal scorer
No, not at all. Liquor laws in SLC are almost indistinguishable from the rest of the country. Almost.you still have to go to a private club to drink alcohol right ?
Maybe it's just me, but that might actually be a good way to winnow out players that care more about partying than hockey if it were a big issue for guys.No, not at all. Liquor laws in SLC are almost indistinguishable from the rest of the country. Almost.