MOGlLNY
Hotel Cuck Chair Adams
- Jan 5, 2008
- 12,802
- 13,591
Lindholm wasn’t re-signing and Calgary knows they’re not winning the cup. Better to get something for him.I guess they are really throwing in the towel huh. That timing was odd to me.
Lindholm wasn’t re-signing and Calgary knows they’re not winning the cup. Better to get something for him.I guess they are really throwing in the towel huh. That timing was odd to me.
I guess they are really throwing in the towel huh. That timing was odd to me.
Imagine Adams bringing in Kuznetsov, a player with a substance abuse problem. Sure, you'd get a 1st line center. But what does that do to the bevy of kids in the locker room?That’s the beauty of the perpetual “kicking the can” strategy. There will always be hope in three more years!
Imagine Adams bringing in Kuznetsov, a player with a substance abuse problem. Sure, you'd get a 1st line center. But what does that do to the bevy of kids in the locker room?
Murray did that three times over: Kane, Bogosian, and Lehner. One troublemaker who was a bad example of a pro, one lazy player who got along on physical gifts, and a player with a substance abuse problem.
Virtually everyone Adams brings in has been to set a culture example. In the long run, that'll led to a lot more winning than the short-term gratification of just bringing someone in.
I’ve never seen him generally play desperate, playoff-style hockey, diving in front of pucks and rushing back to cover for other guys and stuff. At least compared to successful NHL playoff teams.Would love to hear more about that from you or whoever it was that raised that question. Can't think of a single more effective playoff style forward on this roster at the moment. Tight spaces, stick battles, board play, quick passing windows. Effort.
Yes, in the long run. His plan has us not making the playoffs until literally 2027.Imagine Adams bringing in Kuznetsov, a player with a substance abuse problem. Sure, you'd get a 1st line center. But what does that do to the bevy of kids in the locker room?
Murray did that three times over: Kane, Bogosian, and Lehner. One troublemaker who was a bad example of a pro, one lazy player who got along on physical gifts, and a player with a substance abuse problem.
Virtually everyone Adams brings in has been to set a culture example. In the long run, that'll led to a lot more winning than the short-term gratification of just bringing someone in.
Unless I missed something, it hasn't been a decade.Yes, in the long run. His plan has us not making the playoffs until literally 2027.
You skip adding Kuznetzov because he isn’t a good fit, not because “every trade option out there is bad for culture.” This is a silly example for why the GM needs almost a decade to get to the playoffs.
Of course that’s true. No one has ever even implied otherwise. You just randomly responded to my post as if that was what I was recommending. Either learn how to read or respond to the actual point made in the post,Unless I missed something, it hasn't been a decade.
It's been a decade for the Sabres, but not for Adams. And I'm not an ardent Adams supporter. Just pointing out that he's had the reigns for 3 and a 1/2 years. Also just pointing out that a stupid move is worse than no move.
Yes, in the long run. His plan has us not making the playoffs until literally 2027.
You skip adding Kuznetzov because he isn’t a good fit, not because “every trade option out there is bad for culture.” This is a silly example for why the GM needs almost a decade to get to the playoffs.
Everyone randomly responds to posts. It's a message board. That's what people do. Unless you just throw ideas and thoughts out there just to read your own words.Of course that’s true. No one has ever even implied otherwise. You just randomly responded to my post as if that was what I was recommending. Either learn how to read or respond to the actual point made in the post,
Half of that roster had, um... season lift tickets to all the local slopes. Murray had a type for certain.Four - O’Reilly. Timmy’s wasn’t his only drunken rodeo.
Half of that roster had, um... season lift tickets to all the local slopes. Murray had a type for certain.
Lol thanks...I wasn't trying to be subtle or anything.
If true, this is really going to be a critical point of Adams career and I have a feeling its going to come back and bite him in the ass...
The goalie Petey heard they're looking at is Gibson...Looking for a #1 goalie? When UPL has had the best season of his career and is looking the part of a #1 goalie?
I get that there's smoke around Mitts........but I don't buy the #1 goalie thing for a minute right now.
I haven't watched enough Anaheim to know if Gibson is back to form or not.......but my knee-jerk reaction is still "I want zero part of that contract".The goalie Petey heard they're looking at is Gibson...
He could turn into the next Reinhart for sureI mean, most players they have traded away seem to do much better when off the Sabres. I wouldn't be surprised to see Mittelstadt become a 90 point guy on a good team.
Same here.. I also dont feel like Gibson is that much of an upgrade from UPL..I haven't watched enough Anaheim to know if Gibson is back to form or not.......but my knee-jerk reaction is still "I want zero part of that contract".
If true, this is really going to be a critical point of Adams career and I have a feeling its going to come back and bite him in the ass...
** And apparently the goalie is Gibson...
Mitts for Gibson would be the last facepalm I ever make as a Sabres fan.The goalie Petey heard they're looking at is Gibson...
Craig's real quote: "$6.4M is a very good contract" lolI haven't watched enough Anaheim to know if Gibson is back to form or not.......but my knee-jerk reaction is still "I want zero part of that contract".
At four failed seasons with his lack of effort…why would he deserve a fifth offseason? How many GMs get to fail this spectacularly and keep going? This one wouldn’t have been hired by any other team...and it’s going exactly as you’d predict. He took over a team coming off a better season than the one he’s overseeing after FOUR OFFSEASONS.Unless I missed something, it hasn't been a decade.
It's been a decade for the Sabres, but not for Adams. And I'm not an ardent Adams supporter. Just pointing out that he's had the reigns for 3 and a 1/2 years. Also just pointing out that a stupid move is worse than no move.