YP44
Registered User
I would go with neither. Both are overpaid. Both are liabilities, but Hamhuis is softer than Schultz and has fallen off hard. Yandle has offensive instincts and maybe would be better in this system, but i feel like one could do better, cheaper. And neither solves our real problem of a guy to munch minutes as a #3 in all situations (Hamhuis could do it, but not well imo).
Do you mean both WILL be overpaid? I am talking about what you think their next contracts will be like