Glorydays22
Registered User
- Nov 21, 2011
- 1,921
- 1,156
I would love this deal for Nelson....Nelson for Colton, Ritchie and a first with someone like Kivaranta to balance out the money?
I would love this deal for Nelson....Nelson for Colton, Ritchie and a first with someone like Kivaranta to balance out the money?
If they do fall out of it and someone offers a first and a prospect with no salary retained I’d imagine they’d listen seriously. If they win say next four or five in a row I bet they buy.Maybe, who knows, but if you wanna rid yourself of the players that aren’t getting it done, just rip the bandaid off and get going. It’s also a statement to the other players for the rest of the season.
So we're just going to ignore the same and predictable pattern of the last 5 years and magically think it's going to be different *this year*...? It's more like...
We've seen.
But at the same time he's bringing up "history" when it comes to Lou's moves, but ignores the history of last season where Isles finished as one of the best teams in the league, without Barzal, to make the playoffs. I'm not saying they'll do this again, but why cherry pick only the history you want. Perif is as unhinged as ever these days.He was responding to a poster hypothesizing that the Islanders would need to win 7 of 9 to get back into the race. Sure, that kind of play would vault the Canadiens back into the race too.
His point was that using the evidence of the last 200ish games of Islanders hockey, the odds of sustained successful play are quite low.
You think the Islander's were one of the best teams in the league last season?? And you're calling someone else unhinged.But at the same time he's bringing up "history" when it comes to Lou's moves, but ignores the history of last season where Isles finished as one of the best teams in the league, without Barzal, to make the playoffs. I'm not saying they'll do this again, but why cherry pick only the history you want. Perif is as unhinged as ever these days.
You know why.but why cherry pick only the history you want.
Sorry perif, but this is the biggest load of bullshit coming from you of all people on here... this is your shtick and has been for as long as I've been on here. I know you're as passionate as they come around here, but come on dude.
This is YOUR worldview. Don't project you myopic vision on me.
When I wrote "we'll see", it wasn't necessarily in contradiction or defiance to what you said. It was a a literal statement; we'll see what the future holds. I largely stay away from making predictions about this team. They rarely pan out, and when they do, it's more often coincidental than due to any real insight into the game or the business of hockey. A blind squirrel finding a nut scenario.
If this team doesn't make the playoffs this season, then something will obviously have to give with this roster. The easiest thing to do, or not do in this case, is to not re-sign a player on an expiring contract that will send them to unrestricted free agency, who is in their mid-30s and no longer as effective as they once were . It requires zero effort. So once again, we'll see.
I will say this though; should those two return, with players like Fasching and Gauthier already under contract for next year and making no money, I'll officially be in the "need a new GM" camp.
This game ebbs and flows - nothing is permanent in this game. Teams play like shit, team go on a roll, teams peak, etc. I am not saying they will go on a run just stating the fact that a run is needed to propel them back into the race.This is when you know things aren't good - When you're projecting the future as opposed to looking at what is happening....
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD]Sat, Jan 13[/TD]
[TD]@Nashville[/TD]
[TD]L3-1[/TD]
[TD]19-13-10[/TD]
[TD]Sorokin[/TD]
[TD]Sorokin[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Mon, Jan 15[/TD]
[TD]@Minnesota[/TD]
[TD]L5-0[/TD]
[TD]19-14-10[/TD]
[TD]Sorokin[/TD]
[TD]Sorokin[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Tue, Jan 16[/TD]
[TD]@Winnipeg[/TD]
[TD]L4-2[/TD]
[TD]19-15-10[/TD]
[TD]Sorokin[/TD]
[TD]Lee[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Fri, Jan 19[/TD]
[TD]@Chicago[/TD]
[TD]L4-3 OT[/TD]
[TD]19-15-11[/TD]
[TD]Sorokin[/TD]
[TD]Palmieri[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Sun, Jan 21[/TD]
[TD]vsDallas[/TD]
[TD]W3-2 OT[/TD]
[TD]20-15-11[/TD]
[TD]Sorokin[/TD]
[TD]Sorokin[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Tue, Jan 23[/TD]
[TD]vsVegas[/TD]
[TD]L3-2[/TD]
[TD]20-16-11[/TD]
[TD]Sorokin[/TD]
[TD]Dobson[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Thu, Jan 25[/TD]
[TD]@Montreal[/TD]
[TD]L4-3[/TD]
[TD]20-17-11[/TD]
[TD]Varlamov[/TD]
[TD]Barzal[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Sat, Jan 27[/TD]
[TD]vsFlorida[/TD]
[TD]L3-2 OT[/TD]
[TD]20-17-12[/TD]
[TD]Varlamov[/TD]
[TD]Varlamov[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Mon, Feb 5[/TD]
[TD]@Toronto[/TD]
[TD]W3-2[/TD]
[TD]21-17-12[/TD]
[TD]Sorokin[/TD]
[TD]Sorokin[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Thu, Feb 8[/TD]
[TD]vsTampa Bay[/TD]
[TD]W6-2[/TD]
[TD]22-17-12[/TD]
[TD]Sorokin[/TD]
[TD]Horvat[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Sat, Feb 10[/TD]
[TD]vsCalgary[/TD]
[TD]L5-2[/TD]
[TD]22-18-12[/TD]
[TD]Varlamov[/TD]
[TD]Palmieri[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Tue, Feb 13[/TD]
[TD]vsSeattle[/TD]
[TD]L2-1 SO[/TD]
[TD]22-18-13[/TD]
[TD]Sorokin[/TD]
[TD]Sorokin[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
How much more lackluster, if not terrible, play has to happen right in front of our eyes before we can all finally admit this roster is not only not good enough to win a Cup, but will continue to only get further away with each passing season?
Change can be a very good thing. In the case of the Isles it's actually very necessary.
Why?I would love this deal for Nelson....
This game ebbs and flows - nothing is permanent in this game. Teams play like shit, team go on a roll, teams peak, etc. I am not saying they will go on a run just stating the fact that a run is needed to propel them back into the race.
Yes, they have played like shit the last few weeks but there is time for them to right this, especially with so many flawed teams in the East. Their time is running out, so they better get going.
If they do not make the playoffs, then most here will get their wish - roster changes will be made.
This is YOUR worldview. Don't project you myopic vision on me.
I just worded it wrong. I meant they finished with one of the best records in the NHL the last third of the season. My bad. I was typing quickly and didn't put "to close the season". So yes, I'm still calling him unhinged.You think the Islander's were one of the best teams in the league last season?? And you're calling someone else unhinged.
Just want to mention that anybody saying "Person XXX has done action YYY the entire time he's been in job ZZZ, so it stands to reason that person XXX will continue doing YYY as long as he's conducting job ZZZ" isn't expressing a worldview or saying anything myopic.
Quite the opposite.
Using previous evidence to make any kind of read on what is likely to happen is basically the only sound argument that can be made, knowing that the future can't be read anyhow.
When it comes to Lou, I mean, common. The guy has been pretty doggone straight forward in his modi operandi the entire time he's been here.
If he surprises us, he surprises us. Great.
But there's no evidence that he's going to be changing his patterns of business.
I hope folks aren't ready to view posters here as debbie downers or whatever simply because they discuss this team with this point always in mind?
Why, because our system sucks. Of the Top 100 prospects (NHL Hockey writer's website. We have 1.... 1 player - Dufour at 93. We need to build up system. Ritchie is rated 72 and he's only 18. Colton is only 27, signed until 2027 for 4M which is reasonable. For now is a decent replacement for Nelson until hopefully guys like Danny Nelson, Gil, Berg and Ritchie to take over.Why?
Calum Ritchie is nothing special, Ross Colton is a top 9 F making 4m, and that first might be a very low pick in a weak draft.
Pounding your chest at the lowest point of the season and yelling "told you so they suck" is vapid and stupid. Where was here when the Isles were winning and in a playoff spot? Oh that's right pontificating about how we're not winning the cup anyway. Whatever.He was responding to a poster hypothesizing that the Islanders would need to win 7 of 9 to get back into the race. Sure, that kind of play would vault the Canadiens back into the race too.
His point was that using the evidence of the last 200ish games of Islanders hockey, the odds of sustained successful play are quite low.
That’s it in a nutshell.Why, because our system sucks. Of the top 100 prospects (NHL hockey writer’s website. We have 1… 1 player - Dufour at 93. We need to build up system. Ritchie is rated 72 and he's only 18. Colton is only 27, signed until 2027 for 4M which is reasonable. For now is a decent replacement for Nelson until hopefully guys like Danny Nelson, Gil, Berg and Ritchie to take over.
Regarding the draft pick. I hate to break it to you. If the isles move Nelson, the teams coming from him are ALL playoff bound teams so all of them will be a low 1st rounder. You aren't dealing him to Ottawa, Arizona or Ana....so, not sure what you are thinking when we are considering breaking down this older core.
72. Calum Ritchie, C, Colorado Avalanche
Calum Ritchie has great puck skills and sometimes it looks like he’s glued the puck to his stick while carving through defenders or when he’s on a breakaway. His skills make him very well suited as a center at the next level with good size, a coveted right-handed shot, good defensive habits (kills penalties quite well), and solid faceoff results. He has the tools to be a top-6 forward, but his offensive game will need to continue to grow as it has this season if he wants to reach that level of play in the NHL.
Fair enough, but if you're going to do that kind of in-season record parsing and pick and choose what periods best reflected on the Isles but then call someone else out for being selective in their read of history, well, that's a problem....I just worded it wrong. I meant they finished with one of the best records in the NHL the last third of the season. My bad. I was typing quickly and didn't put "to close the season". So yes, I'm still calling him unhinged.
Just want to mention that anybody saying "Person XXX has done action YYY the entire time he's been in job ZZZ, so it stands to reason that person XXX will continue doing YYY as long as he's conducting job ZZZ" isn't expressing a worldview or saying anything myopic.
Quite the opposite.
Using previous evidence to make any kind of read on what is likely to happen is basically the only sound argument that can be made, knowing that the future can't be read anyhow.
When it comes to Lou, I mean, common. The guy has been pretty doggone straight forward in his modi operandi the entire time he's been here.
If he surprises us, he surprises us. Great.
But there's no evidence that he's going to be changing his patterns of business.
I hope folks aren't ready to view posters here as debbie downers or whatever simply because they discuss this team with this point always in mind?
Since Christmas we have played 20 games. Anders Lee has contributed 3 goals and 2 assists. A .25 PPG pace playing on the 1st line. He is a black hole, a complete net negative. 2 more seasons after this year. Get him far away from the 1st line.
NOW you've done it!I'd resign Jon Sim to play the 4th line and feel much better than I do now about the state of the team.