CupHolders
Really Fries My Bananas!
- Aug 8, 2006
- 7,566
- 5,905
Any trade that involves moving Pelech for Hanifin AND STILL keeping Aho in the lineup… why?
I’m not even as much an Aho hater as others. But I just don’t see the value in adding additional assets for the supposed incremental improvement of Hanifin over Pelech. Especially since it will require a steeper financial commitment to extend him.
I know people are down on Pelech… but there’s a bit of recency bias at play maybe?
I’m not even as much an Aho hater as others. But I just don’t see the value in adding additional assets for the supposed incremental improvement of Hanifin over Pelech. Especially since it will require a steeper financial commitment to extend him.
I know people are down on Pelech… but there’s a bit of recency bias at play maybe?
Last edited: