JKP
Registered User
I still think Arizona will make sense if they get into a cash crunch, which, lord knows, they likely will. $5M cap hit, $3.5M dollars. Someone will Garth Snow that contract.No NHL team is interested in Josh Bailey
I still think Arizona will make sense if they get into a cash crunch, which, lord knows, they likely will. $5M cap hit, $3.5M dollars. Someone will Garth Snow that contract.No NHL team is interested in Josh Bailey
This is being speculated upon because "why not just move Barzal to wing" is apparently untenable.If it's a winger why not just move Nelson to wing.
Yes and NYI adds Dufour or a future 2nd.If you're the Hawks, do you call about Bailey?
Heresy. Think of all those Barzal jerseys that will end up in the back of everyone's closets.For a team that needs goals, trading Nelson makes little sense. JGP is cheaper than Karlsson (and I’ve advocated for acquiring him, but Vegas wants to keep him) as a 3C.
Really, the odd guy out is the one everyone keeps trying to solve for. If anything, trade him for a winger and/or D-man to rebalance the roster and everything will settle down on the ice too.
I think it's far fetched, but in context, it makes more sense than trading Pageau and putting Nelson at 3c.Funny how trading Brock Nelson isn't so far fetched anymore.
Taking the long view of this team isn’t the strong suit of too many posters around here.
Sad!
Taking the long view of this team isn’t the strong suit of too many posters around here.
The proposal is to put a back-to-back 35 goal scorer making $6M playing 3rd line center? He’s essentially the best forward on the team and most cost efficient in cap/production, but gets buried on the 3rd line? Wow.
Allegedly now the Ducks aren’t interested in Bailey either.
Looks like it might be time for Lou to bust out any and all dirt he collected on Trotz while he was on the IslandThen that leaves Chicago or Nashville
Damn the salary cap sucks
Buffalo could in theory be an option.Then that leaves Chicago or Nashville
Damn the salary cap sucks
At the time that Pageau was acquired, Nelson was more of a “middle-of-the-pack” 55 point 2C and Pageau was looking like a “high-end” 20 goal 3C.The real issue to me is that Pageau is being thrown as a trade option, when in reality he's one of the most important players on this team. We whined about not having a 3C for so long, that now we see him as tradable?
Pageau was almost near his career high with 12 games missed. I don't think you let go of such a player, especially when you still can competeAt the time that Pageau was acquired, Nelson was more of a “middle-of-the-pack” 55 point 2C and Pageau was looking like a “high-end” 20 goal 3C.
Since the acquisition, Pageau’s offense fell off (defense is still strong but 5M per strong?) and Nelson grew into a 1C.
If Pageau was putting up the numbers he has been while garnering legit Selke votes, I’d be okay with him at 5M per. The problem is he’s not a Selke caliber forward and his offense is comparable to his role.
We have to judge when our best assets are going to "time out" of being productive or being able to net a top return, and act on that before they die on the vine.Hey, a year ago I was extremely opposed to it and argued with you about it.
But, it's clear the team needs a change and as we assess what assets this team has, Brock Nelson is (unfortunately) the most valuable. The benefit to the Islanders organization, is that their highest valued asset is coming from a position of strength considering they have 4 other Centers - Horvat, Barzal, JGP and Cizikas.
It sucks to admit, but he might have to be traded to successfully "shake-up" the team for the better.
I don't disagree with that if they feel Barzal is a C. Going with Barzal, Horvat and JGP would be a more traditional distribution. And as you said, trading Nelson would bring a good return and fill a hole on D (Toews or Hanifin?) or the wing. Also, a decision is going to need to be made on Nelson in a year anyway - to extend or trade him. If they extend him he'll be 33 at the start of the new term. I don't see Brock as a guy who's gotten beaten up or who relies on speed, so he could contribute into his latter 30s. But still, term and $$ will be a question.If you're adamant about using Barzal at center, you might as well keep Pageau for defensive and penalty killing duties, and trade Nelson. Not only would you get a much better return, you'd have a more natural hierarchy at center.
Not anymore he isn't, the injuries have taken a toll on him. Plus Horvat gives us all of Peageau's pluses anyhow with faceoffs, PK, etc. Pageau had the SAME basic offensive production as Beau did over the full season.The real issue to me is that Pageau is being thrown as a trade option, when in reality he's one of the most important players on this team. We whined about not having a 3C for so long, that now we see him as tradable?
Allegedly now the Ducks aren’t interested in Bailey either.
I get the frustration with Barzal, but for all his issues he's young, he's a great/fast skater, and he's got a lot of skill (especially at transporting the puck and entering the zone). Some concerns with the Isles are that we're getting older, we're slow, we lack skill, and we're not great at moving the puck and zone entries. So I'd be wary about trading him.For a team that needs goals, trading Nelson makes little sense. JGP is cheaper than Karlsson (and I’ve advocated for acquiring him, but Vegas wants to keep him) as a 3C.
Really, the odd guy out is the one everyone keeps trying to solve for. If anything, trade him for a winger and/or D-man to rebalance the roster and everything will settle down on the ice too.
Nah, that’s what you wrote.That was NOT the proposal. Try to take a breath, read all the words, and take a moment to digest the point before you reply.