The PA are obviously happy with term, because it benefits their clients, but I have heard before that it is a cause of concern to the NHL because trades generate interest and media coverage. A bunch of trades at the deadline and draft is fine, but when there are next to no in season trading due to cap constraints it's a bad sign. The NHLPA will not take too kindly to players signed to 8 year deals and then shipped off elsewhere shortly thereafter, so it's a double edged sword.Chevy needs to come out of this with players under long term contracts that are good players. He can’t get back guys with 2yrs left on their deal.
On the contracts, the NHLPA is more than fine with the long term deals on 2nd contracts - it’s forcing big deals on prime assets. Player movement is not the concern of the PA, ie trades and velocity of such.
With more long termed deals, all that is gonna happen is teams will be trading one termed deal for another or some combo thereof.
Most contending teams are going to have lots of locked in players.
That's not an NHL ruling item, it's part of the collective bargaining agreementWho'll take on their deals?? Once you sign somebody to 8 year deals you are basically stuck with them no matter how good or bad they are or become. This is the main problem in hockey today. Too many players get signed to long term deals making them nigh on impossible to move. GMs seem to panic once they near RFA or UFA status and hand out deals they know will come to hurt the team in the future.
If the NHL wants to encourage more trades then each team should only be allowed X number of contracts longer than 4 years.
Players are just getting their money, this gen of players has no issues with telling a team they no longer want to play for them. So, player gets paid either way, team has to accommodate for it.The PA are obviously happy with term, because it benefits their clients, but I have heard before that it is a cause of concern to the NHL because trades generate interest and media coverage. A bunch of trades at the deadline and draft is fine, but when there are next to no in season trading due to cap constraints it's a bad sign. The NHLPA will not take too kindly to players signed to 8 year deals and then shipped off elsewhere shortly thereafter, so it's a double edged sword.
GMs are too easily giving NMCs and NTCs to players, so in the future this is something they should be looking at in the next CBA.
Lou is salivating
Actually, Winnipeg would be one of the places that would be amenable to taking on Barzal and/or Horvat. They have stated that they want to compete, yet they are facing a number of players including their top two centers refusing to re-sign.
It's fun coming up with trade ideas, and there are some good ones here. However, I'll be surprised if Lou does anything more than re-sign UFAs, make Bailey go away, and maybe do one or two smaller housekeeping/cap moves. One can hope though....
He’s decent, got torched in TOR, a number of former players have stated that he had difficulties with the transition to NA and it impacted his game.Trying to get creative and wondering - how bad is Nikita Zaitsev? He's entering the last year of his contract with a cap hit and actual $$ owed of $4.5M. Would CHI trade him straight up for Bailey (who has a cap hit that's $500k higher but is owed $1M less actual $$)? Let Mayfield walk. Assuming no other moves, the bottom pair is a rotation of Aho/Bolduc/Zaitsev/AHL callups. Lou signed Zaitsev to his contract. Zaitsev and Sorokin were teammates for a year and a half with CSKA. Bailey goes away for "free" (and we gain $500k cap space in the exchange). Zaitsev makes maybe a bit more than Mayfield would cost this upcoming season so that's close to a cap wash (but without the multiple following years). Or is Zaitsev really bad?![]()
I hope by "you", you didn't mean me!It's one thing to hope...It's another to let that hope blind you into denial of basic facts.
I agree that the likelihood is that Mayfield re-signs, but Zaitsev seems like a way to make Bailey disappear without losing any picks or having a buyout mess with the cap. And maybe make Sorokin happier.He’s decent, got torched in TOR, a number of former players have stated that he had difficulties with the transition to NA and it impacted his game.
Still think Mayfield gets a deal done with Isles.
Maybe creatively, Pettersen has hinted he wants to win, Vancouver is nowhere near that. Isles need a winger and need to dump a center. Hmm…
Teams with lax tax laws + hometown team.Rumors of some of Debrincat's preferred list of teams: "Garrioch reports DeBrincat's list is believed to include the Dallas Stars, Nashville Predators, Florida Panthers, Vegas Golden Knights and the Detroit Red Wings."
![]()
Off-Season Watch: Who's on Ottawa Senators RFA Alex DeBrincat's preferred trade list? | TSN
Ahead of the NHL Draft on June 28-29 and the opening of free agency on July 1, TSN.ca keeps you up to date with all the latest rumours and speculation from around the NHL beat.www.tsn.ca
Ugh, really? If income tax avoidance is actually his primary consideration, then who would even want him?Teams with lax tax laws
Millionaires gonna millionaireUgh, really? If income tax avoidance is actually his primary consideration, then who would even want him?
And plenty of sunshine too (except Detroit, that is)Teams with lax tax laws + hometown team.
I hope by "you", you didn't mean me!![]()
So, trade someone for me, otherwise, DET will do…Rumors of some of Debrincat's preferred list of teams: "Garrioch reports DeBrincat's list is believed to include the Dallas Stars, Nashville Predators, Florida Panthers, Vegas Golden Knights and the Detroit Red Wings."
![]()
Off-Season Watch: Who's on Ottawa Senators RFA Alex DeBrincat's preferred trade list? | TSN
Ahead of the NHL Draft on June 28-29 and the opening of free agency on July 1, TSN.ca keeps you up to date with all the latest rumours and speculation from around the NHL beat.www.tsn.ca
Players are taxed on where they play the games, so 41 dates are ‘lax’ per se in a state advantaged tax system. The difference is not that large in the end. He seems to be forcing a trade to DET since those other teams have to move players/cap out to accommodate him. He’s not that special.Teams with lax tax laws + hometown team.
If he doesn’t want to resign, then it’s the CAL mode of do the best you can.I agree that the likelihood is that Mayfield re-signs, but Zaitsev seems like a way to make Bailey disappear without losing any picks or having a buyout mess with the cap. And maybe make Sorokin happier.
I suggested a Barzal-Pettersson swap a while back, but even with "VAN points inflation" Pettersson's 102 points messed with that and probably means the Isles would have to add (and/or take back Myers in the deal as the Mayfield replacement). But that doesn't cure Bailey-itis.
It's a concern for lots of players.Ugh, really? If income tax avoidance is actually his primary consideration, then who would even want him?
I don't think Detroit qualifies for lax tax laws . . .Teams with lax tax laws + hometown team.
Every professional athlete with a big contract considers that these days. Remember they have to pay MANY state and local income taxes to all the jurisdictions they play in, home AND road gamesUgh, really? If income tax avoidance is actually his primary consideration, then who would even want him?
Detroit is the "hometown team" in ECK's post.I don't think Detroit qualifies for lax tax laws . . .
Every professional athlete with a big contract considers that these days. Remember they have to pay MANY state and local income taxes to all the jurisdictions they play in, home AND road games
If you're making $10M a year, 41 lax tax games could be the difference of getting yourself another luxury car or a boat versus sending it to Uncle Sam.So, trade someone for me, otherwise, DET will do…
Players are taxed on where they play the games, so 41 dates are ‘lax’ per se in a state advantaged tax system. The difference is not that large in the end. He seems to be forcing a trade to DET since those other teams have to move players/cap out to accommodate him. He’s not that special.
It's a concern for lots of players.
I don't doubt it and don't mean to discount it (or be hypocritical since I'd probably consider it too). It just seems like bad form if those teams are truly the only ones on his list + his hometown. Of course it is just a rumor so who knows....Every professional athlete with a big contract considers that these days. Remember they have to pay MANY state and local income taxes to all the jurisdictions they play in, home AND road games