13th Floor
Registered User
- Oct 10, 2008
- 19,060
- 8,486
Bailey and Wally to Arizona for 2 2024 2nds and a 2025 2nd . . . that would leave Arizona with 5 2nd's in those 2 yearsOh, I wouldn't trade him for a 3rd rounder. If he's traded he needs to be a package for something better or to move Bailey so they can sign someone better.
I am not moving Wally unless it is absolutely necessary to SUBSTANTIALLY upgrade the team elsewhere. He is young, cheap and slots in quite easily on the third line alongside JGP and (presumably) Parise.
His development hasn't been linear, however, excluding short-timers on the roster, I believe he was fifth in Corsi EV and he isn't afraid to drop the gloves and stand up for a teammate or himself.
The Isles need more of that, not less.
I look at Wally's growth like Romanov's. Lots of people hated the Romanov deal, held it against the player and wanted to run him out of town. Now that he is getting comfortable, learning and growing, you see the player he can become.
Wally is a decent top-9 player now, with the potential for more as long as he is willing to learn and keeps working. To me, he feels like the anti-Beauvillier, who played soft, lacked confidence and is your archetype West player.
And, again, Wally is young and still inexpensive contractually. No need to move him unless it is part of a big return or other move.
To be clear, I want to move him for an upgrade, not to just get rid of him.
I'm not one of those fans that were going after Romanov, and defenseman take longer than forwards to develop normally. I think it's unfair to label Beauvillier as soft, he didn't shy away from contact, he just wasn't a big guy who delivers hits. Wahlstrom isn't some Clutterbuck clone either, he throws his body around from time to time but he isn't what I would consider physical. If Wahlstrom had some of Beauvillier's hustle he'd be a very good player, but he coasts around far too often for my liking. He's a guy who when he's not scoring isn't impacting the game in any other positive way.
I am not sure he even has a roster spot next year. Fasching has been significantly more impactful in his brief time than anything Wahlstrom has done, and he's more suited for a bottom six role.
Barzal Horvat Lee
Engvall Nelson Palmieri
Parise Pageau Fasching
Martin Cizikas Clutterbuck
Is Wahlstrom better than anyone on that roster (assuming Engvall is retained)? I really don't think so. His shot is like Pulock's at this point, it looks nice but it doesn't get much accomplished. I wouldn't hate if he was kept around because he's serviceable and is cheap/young but I could see him being trade bait for sure.
I think it will depend on the severity of Wahlstrom's injury (can he definitely be relied on to make a full recovery?) and how Engvall and Fasching play the rest of the way.
Still lots of time for one to play themselves into or out of the Isles future plans.
I hope Engvall does well and makes a strong case for himself however, if he does too well, he might just price himself off of the Isles and a cap floor team will be able to offer significantly more money.
There is still lots of time before any definitive call needs to be made.
I think this season proved teams need more than 12 forwards. Injuries happen. Wahlstrom won’t be expensive. I haven’t seen any of the remaining Bridgeport forwards look to be NHL ready.To be clear, I want to move him for an upgrade, not to just get rid of him.
I'm not one of those fans that were going after Romanov, and defenseman take longer than forwards to develop normally. I think it's unfair to label Beauvillier as soft, he didn't shy away from contact, he just wasn't a big guy who delivers hits. Wahlstrom isn't some Clutterbuck clone either, he throws his body around from time to time but he isn't what I would consider physical. If Wahlstrom had some of Beauvillier's hustle he'd be a very good player, but he coasts around far too often for my liking. He's a guy who when he's not scoring isn't impacting the game in any other positive way.
I am not sure he even has a roster spot next year. Fasching has been significantly more impactful in his brief time than anything Wahlstrom has done, and he's more suited for a bottom six role.
Barzal Horvat Lee
Engvall Nelson Palmieri
Parise Pageau Fasching
Martin Cizikas Clutterbuck
Is Wahlstrom better than anyone on that roster (assuming Engvall is retained)? I really don't think so. His shot is like Pulock's at this point, it looks nice but it doesn't get much accomplished. I wouldn't hate if he was kept around because he's serviceable and is cheap/young but I could see him being trade bait for sure.
I think this season proved teams need more than 12 forwards. Injuries happen. Wahlstrom won’t be expensive. I haven’t seen any of the remaining Bridgeport forwards look to be NHL ready.
If Wahlstrom is traded for a top-line winger, I'm all in. It would have been nice to use this year to evaluate his development, but I don't see a true top-6'er in him (just like I didn't in Beau). With that said, acquiring a top-line winger is more important than Wahlstrom.
Brock practicing:
It’s the age old dilemma.That very well may happen but he's still young and has upside. We don't have many of those guys in our system.
What would we get for him? A 3rd rounder....maybe?
Fact of the matter is that the loss of this season may have a huge impact on what Wahlstrom comes to mean for this franchise. At the moment, he's in no-man's land.
We *needed* to find out what he is this year. This was one of Lambert's key challenges coming into the season.
Instead, we've been finding out what Fasching is. We've been getting a look at what Holmstrom can be. We've gotten looks at Durandeau, who was previously completely a non-factor.
And at the same time, RW Dufour has been putting in a decent first pro year in the A while RW Maggio is one of the shooting stars in the prospect world. Even The Hockey News just did a podcast with him (https://thehockeynews.com/podcast/t...gios-goals-in-windsor-and-islanders-prospects).
This was a critical, critical year for Wahlstrom. We needed to find out what he is.
Instead, he remains a mystery and other guys are doing what they can to establish themselves, thus contributing to him possibly becoming obsolete.
CAVEAT:
He's still a coveted asset and must be treated as such. We need him to be "valuable".
Whew on brock. Now how about a timetable on barzy?