Mike C
Registered User
One of Roman Polanki's young protégés?I do see a slight resemblance but no sorry. Mine is an actress not a singer . Unlimited guesses for a limited time
One of Roman Polanki's young protégés?I do see a slight resemblance but no sorry. Mine is an actress not a singer . Unlimited guesses for a limited time
Caught the last 30 mins of the draft coverage on ESPN+, they said some things regarding a full rebuild that made sense. They talked about how a full tear down rebuild is very time consuming and doesn’t guarantee any level of success. They mentioned how after 25 straight years of making the playoffs, Detroit opted for a rebuild, haven’t made the playoffs since 2016, haven’t won a round since 2013, and won’t be making again this year. Rebuilds are painful for everyone and don’t guarantee success. Certainly not quickly. Unless you’re the rangers and every top guy just goes there. Depending what happens this off-season, maybe the isles don’t need a tear down rebuild. Maybe Lou’s retool on the fly will get us somewhere. Idk.
great point!!Hey guys, at the end of the day. We are all diehard Isles fans and only want the same thing - WIN- win a cup if possible. lol.
Everyone has a different opinion on how to get there, which is why we all come to these sites to play GM for a bit
Follow up on my own post. Anyone know why Romanov is wearing a full shield and for how long? I hated wearing one. ThanksWas not crazy about the Romanov deal when it happened. Warmed up to it as the season started and obviously disappointed at the moment. With that being said, it doesn't mean he can't develop into the dman we hoped we were acquiring. That falls on the coaching staff. I know the NHL isn't a developmental league but they need to teach on the fly, unlock the potential, and put players in the best position to succeed.
I think Lou really thought he would be the rock defensively for Dobson and both looked shaky at times together. Others may know how long Lane kept them together. If the team falls out I would like to see them paired together again. Rooting for Romanov as I think he has only played a couple hundred of games so far.
Surprised like others that we didn't pick up a depth dman piece. Happy Lou was not trigger happy with Bolduc. Hoping he can really be an effective player in the bigs.
Took a wicked Kessel shot to face in late Jan. Shield was 4-6 week Dr ordered over break.Follow up on my own post. Anyone know why Romanov is wearing a full shield and for how long? I hated wearing one. Thanks
One of the beat guys suggests we look at Varly as a rental that didnt cost anything and insurance for Sorokin. Injury insurance and 3 back to backs in MarchI’m one of those guys. Yeah I like first round picks.
My first take on the Horvat deal was not positive mainly due to his pending UFA status. Once he signed I felt better. I worried about the loss of the first rounder but Beau wasn’t going to make it here and Raty’s skating was very worrisome to me. We got the best piece of that deal by far.
Next move Engvall. I don’t value third round picks all that much and for an established forward with a skill set we lack that’s a solid trade.
I’ll also give Lou credit for not panicking by giving up even more assets for a high priced rental that might not be here next season.
I don’t have a problem with Lou holding onto Mayfield but if he walks in the offseason it won’t look good.
As for Varly, if there was a second round pick to be had for him he guts should’ve been flipped. The Isles aren’t winning a Cup with Varly so why not restock? Maybe that pick could’ve helped unload Bailey in the offseason.
When it’s all said and done Lou gets a B grade from me at the TDL. Even though I’m far from convinced that gets us a playoff spot, it’s way better than I expected.
All fair points. Really respect your takes and this is another.
I view the team through this prism - Does this team have enough talent and good coaching to win the Cup. Right now I say absolutely not.
That said they do have the talent where I think they should be in the playoffs. If you believe that then we've had too many crap games vs lesser opponents like the Jackets and Blues where you really have to question the effort/coaching that we've been getting.
Have things been moderately better lately? Yes they have, but certainly possible that Horvat is the #1 reason why. Collectively for the season the Isles are playing .547 hockey, but since Horvat came aboard they are now playing 0.625 hockey (even without Barzal). If they played like that all season they'd be above the rangers in the standings.
Here's the thing that drives me crazy....
All we hear from Lou is how much he believes in this team, and he fact that he's kept this team together and refuses to trade any roster player, or let them walk in free agency, further confirms he thinks they should've be a Cup contender this season.
Yet you go and fire a hall of fame coach in Trotz who led this team to 2 conference finals. Not sure there was anyone better to coach this team, but fine - You thought he wanted to be a GM, the room tuned him out...Whatever. I hated it the moment it happened, but change can be ok so was waiting to see who got next shot.
That said instead of replacing Trotz with a coach with a nice pedigree, what does Lou do...Replace him with a FIRST TIME coach!?! When you are trying to win the Cup is this a smart thing to do? No it is not.
You said it above: "I don't know if he is the right person for the job - I need more time to evaluate, like making the playoffs and then the playoffs." Why is a supposed Cup contending team hiring a guy who we need more time to figure out if he's a good coach?
Last offseason 10 teams hired new coaches, but only 3 gave their HC spot to a first time coach: The Blackhawks, Red Wings, and your New York Islanders. The first two are knee-deep in rebuilds so that makes more sense. Lou refuses to rebuild so you know that's not us, yet he fires a hall of fame coach to and goes with a rookie head coach. For me that's GM malpractice.
Then Lou compounds that mistake by trading yet another 1st rounder which is a great asset and trade it for an inconsistent 22 year old D-man with limited upside?
If the mouth-breaking "In Lou we trust" crowd would pause for a second, you would see both moves a terrible in and of themselves, but even worse when you consider this aging roster should be going for a Cup right now, or rebuilding. Both the Lambert and Romanov moves are honestly the kind moves that Milbury would've made, and why we should probably acknowledge that Trotz was better as a coach than Lou is as a GM. And if that bears out then we're probably fooling ourselves that Lou can lead this team back to the Conference finals...Much less further.
Did any west team add and use a third party from the East? Because I wouldn’t do it to help any East teamI know Lou likes to keep his options open and have the cap space available should an opportunity arise, but utilizing some of his cap space to be the retainer in a 3 way deal to help recoup some assets would have been nice
I don’t see how we add anything- to my calculations we’re gonna need just about every cent to just keep our guys. Maybe I’m missing something.I hope this off-season we see cap of 84.5 - 2m increase - it will allow them to add a top 6 F, resign Mayfield and here is to Dufour and Bolduc being NHL players
Imagine being this blinkered.Lou won't even let reporters know that he's done for the day.
As if he might gain some advantage over other teams with them thinking he *might* pull off a deal AFTER the trade deadline...
I agree with this. Picks are generally overrated.I’m one of those guys. Yeah I like first round picks.
My first take on the Horvat deal was not positive mainly due to his pending UFA status. Once he signed I felt better. I worried about the loss of the first rounder but Beau wasn’t going to make it here and Raty’s skating was very worrisome to me. We got the best piece of that deal by far.
Next move Engvall. I don’t value third round picks all that much and for an established forward with a skill set we lack that’s a solid trade.
I’ll also give Lou credit for not panicking by giving up even more assets for a high priced rental that might not be here next season.
I don’t have a problem with Lou holding onto Mayfield but if he walks in the offseason it won’t look good.
As for Varly, if there was a second round pick to be had for him he should’ve been flipped. The Isles aren’t winning a Cup with Varly so why not restock? Maybe that pick could’ve helped unload Bailey in the offseason.
When it’s all said and done Lou gets a B grade from me at the TDL. Even though I’m far from convinced that gets us a playoff spot, it’s way better than I expected.
Agree on all counts. Well said. Romonav is still young and has shown flashes of why LL acquired him. Needs to be better.Was not crazy about the Romanov deal when it happened. Warmed up to it as the season started and obviously disappointed at the moment. With that being said, it doesn't mean he can't develop into the dman we hoped we were acquiring. That falls on the coaching staff. I know the NHL isn't a developmental league but they need to teach on the fly, unlock the potential, and put players in the best position to succeed.
I think Lou really thought he would be the rock defensively for Dobson and both looked shaky at times together. Others may know how long Lane kept them together. If the team falls out I would like to see them paired together again. Rooting for Romanov as I think he has only played a couple hundred of games so far.
Surprised like others that we didn't pick up a depth dman piece. Happy Lou was not trigger happy with Bolduc. Hoping he can really be an effective player in the bigs.
You guys need to realize that the coaches might actually like some things that Aho can do. My conjecture of what that is…
- He seems to have good coverage - probably the thing coaches prefer the most as it means you are on the first step of executing the game plan.
- He actually wins a lot more puck battles than you would expect, once he does he doesn’t really dither… gets the puck moving in the right way.
But before anyone claps back at me. Yes I would 100% want him upgraded.
- He easily gets overpowered in front of the net.
- Is prone to “inexperienced” give aways. Even if he is older, he has not had as much professional playing time.
- Pretty much seems responsible for a high danger scoring chance or two per game.
But as of now, there is no plan to put anyone else in for him. Ultimately, Bolduc will push him further down the lineup. Hopefully as soon as next year even. But even Bolduc had trouble with reads and executions when faced with the Canucks quick forecheck.
After the trade deadline, are the rosters expanded? Can’t thing bring Bolduc up without having to send anyone down? Maybe they bring him up and cycle him in.If the Islanders make the playoffs I think the defensive deficiencies of Aho and Dobson are going to be on full display against Boston or Carolina. I also think Romanov is going to show up big defensively. Bolduc should just be up for Aho at this point.
Those teams are definitely aware, and already target Aho and Dobson. Boston getting Hathaway and Bertuzzi is because of how effective the Cizikas line (and even Palmieri even) were at hitting their dman.If the Islanders make the playoffs I think the defensive deficiencies of Aho and Dobson are going to be on full display against Boston or Carolina. I also think Romanov is going to show up big defensively. Bolduc should just be up for Aho at this point.
I agree with your point about Romanov. He has been steadier since the team has gone to a 1-3-1 in the D zone and not having one man so high up in the zone to exit with the puck should it get to him. Also has been steadier since the switch from Mayfield and Dobson to Pulock as a D partner.If the Islanders make the playoffs I think the defensive deficiencies of Aho and Dobson are going to be on full display against Boston or Carolina. I also think Romanov is going to show up big defensively. Bolduc should just be up for Aho at this point.
I was not a fan of the Trotz firing either - Lane was someone who other teams have sniffed around on - he has been in this league a long time. I thought Joel Q was going to be the choice. But let’s see how this shakes out.
I did like the Romanov deal at the time and like that we have him but not at the cost of the pick we have up. It is the fall out from having to trade Toews. I hope they have something in Bolduc or Odelius.
There might be some criticism and wanting of more at this deadline, but I for one love the Horvat trade and extension - it’s a great move by Lou. Engvall is an underrated move, someone who can add some speed and skill to this lineup. He is not someone who is going produce big numbers but will be a very good add to the top 9.
I like Parise - Nelson - Palmieri together and once Maty returns I think him, Lee and Horvat will be a tough line. Third line of a Pageau Engvall and Holmstrom can be a very tough line to play against. I don’t mistaken this as a Stanley Cup roster by any stretch but hoping for a good run.
I hope this off-season we see cap of 84.5 - 2m increase - it will allow them to add a top 6 F, resign Mayfield and here is to Dufour and Bolduc being NHL players
This is the second time in the past few days you’ve mentioned Fiala.So Lane was an assistant coach that other teams "sniffed" around on, but he never got close to a head coaching gig for 10+ years...And you're ok with your GM installing him to lead a team he believes is a Cup contender? I legit don't know how a fan could be ok with hiring a rookie coach who has to learn on the job for a team that the GM says has Cup aspirations. This isn't the Panthers of last year who had to walk away from Quenneville and put in a nobody coach because of a crazy situation. A third of the league changed coaches last offeason so there were other experienced/qualified options to be had, and Lou goes with someone who will probably never have another head coaching gig in the NHL again. It's scarily a move that Milbury or snow would've done.
The Romanov deal is a trainwreck across the board. We just have to admit it. You should never be trading a top 15 pick for a guy that tops out as a 2nd pairing defenseman (but is currently playing like an AHL one). I know some hold out hope that we actually got the 2nd coming of Kasparaitis, but many nights Romanov is as bad as Aho. Even if he puts it together this is a "win now" team so we needed D-man that didn't need more time to develop.
Consider this...We gave up the #13 overall for Romanov. The Kings gave up #19 overall and Brock Faber and got Fiala - Who leads the Kings in scoring. Lou continues to overpay in basically every deal. He never maximizes the assets he gives up and when you have barely any futures to trade in the first place he is always chasing his tail and never quite seems to solve the holes we have (And in the case of Romanov, he didn't solve one at all).
And even assuming that happens, how is that team in 23-24 going to be any better than this squad that is struggling to make the playoffs in a stacked Eastern Conference?
It's all not good enough and time many take off the rose-colored glasses they wear when discussing the GM.