This sounds right to me as well. Though I suspect ADA might want to go four years. I’m good with either, frankly. So much can change. I want more than the one or even two years of roster stability but the super long deals usually backfire. Four-five years seems to be win-win. Also buys out a year or two of RFA.5-year deal would be the best of both worlds for ADA - enough long-term security and a chance for another big payday.
DeAngelo just finished a season fifth in points for defensemen. If Chytil ever becomes that valuable we'd win like 15 Cups.
you kid, but Ani and Avery would be good bottom six options today, if Ottawa retained on Ani and if we could get Avery to stop throwing rocks at cars.Can we get Anisimov and Avery back on the team, and then have Artie do the gun celebration at least twice every game, regardless of whether or not he scores? God, the smile on Avery’s face walking into the locker room after that incident is classic.
That’s...six players.Does anyone prefer DeAngelo to these players offensively going forward?
Makar
Hughes
Dahlin
Carlson
Chabot
Fox
MAYBE one of the players at the top of that list hits $10m in 2022, especially after the lost revenue from this season. Get ready for a flat cap in 20-21.
I want to sign Chytil long term at 4m far more than DeAngelo at 6.5m. The makeup of this roster plays a big factor in that preference.
That’s...six players.
Yeah, and there aren’t going to be more than a handful of defenders paid $10m in 21-22. DeAngelo isn’t one of them.
I’m arguing he’s not going to be more than an $8.25m defenseman in 21-22. I’d project $7.5m long term then vs. $6.5m now.
This kid is a hell of a player but I’m playing the bridge. This is his peak.
Does anyone prefer DeAngelo to these players offensively going forward?
Makar
Hughes
Dahlin
Carlson
Chabot
Fox
MAYBE one of the players at the top of that list hits $10m in 2022, especially after the lost revenue from this season. Get ready for a flat cap in 20-21.
I want to sign Chytil long term at 4m far more than DeAngelo at 6.5m. The makeup of this roster plays a big factor in that preference.
Why does it have to be d for d? Smith can move right side as one option, but that's not the point anyway. If Deangelo wants 6.5 to 7 mill over 7 years they will move him, it wont matter if Lundqvist is ready or not.
Fast should have been signed by now if he was resigning, it's not like 500 grand either way would be much of a swing for us.
Colorado would definately want Hank for one year, their goalies as you say are young, we would have to make it work for them.
Does anyone prefer DeAngelo to these players offensively going forward?
Makar
Hughes
Dahlin
Carlson
Chabot
Fox
MAYBE one of the players at the top of that list hits $10m in 2022, especially after the lost revenue from this season. Get ready for a flat cap in 20-21.
I want to sign Chytil long term at 4m far more than DeAngelo at 6.5m. The makeup of this roster plays a big factor in that preference.
How about they keep the young skilled RD long term? He changes the entire dynamic of this team offensively when he’s on the ice. Sign him long term if you can. 6 years would be great. I’d go to $6-$6.5m per season but I’m not sure it takes that.
Offensively I have Makar as roughly equivalent and Dahlin/Hughes might get there. I don't think any of the others have the potential to get to his level. Carlson had an insane season but he just doesn't have the skill level of Makar/DeAngelo, so I'm (perhaps unfairly) writing it off as a fluke.Does anyone prefer DeAngelo to these players offensively going forward?
Makar
Hughes
Dahlin
Carlson
Chabot
Fox
MAYBE one of the players at the top of that list hits $10m in 2022, especially after the lost revenue from this season. Get ready for a flat cap in 20-21.
I want to sign Chytil long term at 4m far more than DeAngelo at 6.5m. The makeup of this roster plays a big factor in that preference.
I agree, could be a pretty good contract eventually.
I think keeping all three is practicable.
A few points that I think must be considered.
*They are different types. It’s not like anyone of them is like Shattenkirk that must get a certain role or be useless.
*Ds get hurt, depth is really important. Also in terms of longevity of these guys careers. Karlsson was a one man team, it takes a toll.
*I think the cap works. Let’s say the right side on defense cost us 21m long term. 25% of the cap for 15% of the roster. But I think it makes more sense to take away 15m for the goalies and 4th line and pocket change, and look at the player(‘s) share of the remaining 65 in relation to the top 15 skaters. They make up 20% of the top 15 and would get 31% of the cap.
BUT, I think it’s perfectly doable to have a cheap left side, 1 LD that gets paid a lot and 2 cheaper guys making a total of 3-4m.
I like Lindgren, but I also like the guys we have on the farm. Go through 4-5 cost controlled years of these guys and then ship them out like they did with Skjei. The math adds up.
*I think that Nils Lundkvist might replace Fox, nobody can replace Trouba or TDA on our farm.
I don’t want to trade Fox. Capitalize on Lundkvist through trade.
So are some of you guys gonna be pissed if the plan is going w Lindgren , Staal , 2 of Hajek , Rykov , Reunanen........
Let Miller , Robertson , Gross compete in camp
guessing Smith gets traded
I can’t see another LD coming in with expansion looming . Not even a stop gap
You can sign someone insignificant to expose. It shouldn't be someone in your development pool.We have to expose someone. Neither Staal nor Smith are eligible because they are expiring contracts. Trouba, ADA and Lindgren will be protected. Fox is exempt.
That leaves Hajek as the only possibility. He needs to play 40 games next season to qualify. We'll likely bring someone in on a 2 year deal to ensure we have someone to expose. A guy like Andy Greene will only need to play 7 games next year to qualify.
You can sign someone insignificant to expose. It shouldn't be someone in your development pool.
That being said, we aren't currently able to protect Hajek, absent other deals. If we think that holds and we aren't protecting him, we should trade him ASAP, sign the insignificant player to expose.
But maybe we could get a 3rd or a 2nd for him as opposed to losing him for nothing.In a perfect world, you hang onto all of your young guys but they don’t have a spot for Hajek. Fox is exempt and then they have three spots: Lindgren, ADA, Trouba. I wouldn’t consider Hajek a huge loss at this point. He’s likely to get passed by guys like Miller and Robertson in short order.
But maybe we could get a 3rd or a 2nd for him as opposed to losing him for nothing.
Fair points. I think those teams are out there, but certainly they are few. As it stands, we are likely to expose Gauthier, Andersson, Fast and Howden. Maybe thats where we lose a player.I think you’re more likely talking about a 4th or 5th unless he can nail down a spot with the big club this year but sure, why not... unless you think he gets picked over someone you’d rather keep. Also, keep in mind whoever gets him has to protect him... how many teams don’t have 3 defensemen better than Hajek to protect?