wafflepadsave
Registered User
I think Kreider’s decision determines everything.I’m a little surprised Gorton hasn’t done anything yet. Generally he likes to space out his deals so he can concentrate on one at a time
I think Kreider’s decision determines everything.I’m a little surprised Gorton hasn’t done anything yet. Generally he likes to space out his deals so he can concentrate on one at a time
But DeAngelo, a righty, is very comfortable on the left, where he played nearly all his junior career in Sarnia. So there is that.
I don't see this team through the same color glasses as others. We're 4 back and now we're contenders?
All I see is a team that just cannot defend. AT ALL
Right now Shesty is looking like a young Hank... fantastic with almost zero help in front of him.
Going for the cup cus anything can happen.I'm not sure which comments you're referring to since I don't remember Quinn mentioning anything related to today's lineup in the post-game interview. They don't necessarily need to sit anyone prior to the deadline, but it's obviously the more prudent move to avoid injury.
We'll find out more tonight at 530, and if I had to guess, we won't see anyone sitting.
Just to be fair, Hank's salary would be 4.5m for next season, not 8.5m.
Henrik Lundqvist - CapFriendly - NHL Salary Caps
If I get it right, Hank will have been paid 55m of his 59.5m contract by the end of this season.
*Unless, the signing bonus is to be considered. Then it's 5.5m next year and 54 out of 59.5.
yes, and 8,5 million dollars would go away from him. It's huge amount of real money. It would be dumb decision from his point of view. I don't believe it will happen.
Yes, you are right. 4,5m is still a lot of money![]()
I thought the cap was $79m, so I botched that. I saw the old 31 Thoughts quote too. I guess I'm conservative and not basing my plans on what some teams are hopeful for, but rarely get right.What do you think the cap is? It's 81.5 this year.
Skjei could most certainly be moved without taking salary back.
There is a reason, because they're owed a lot of money. Cap rich teams tend to not like 'spending money.' Good thing, this is their final years of a front-loaded contract. Once they're paid their signing bonuses, it becomes palatable.
It's not wishful thinking. That's the benefit of having controllable assets. Sure, they could hold out but I doubt it gets to that. ADA is the only one where this would become an issue.
Strome is more than likely going to be moved at some point.
Buch is more than likely going to be moved at some point.
???? There are no growing pains. We have completely opposite perceptions. Getting rid of Staal, Smith and HL create no pains. Replacing Skjei with ADA on the books is not a pain. Replacing Buch with Kravtsov is not a pain, it sucks that it has to happen but thats how things work in a hard-cap era.
Keep the core/good pieces/performers and move forward. Kreider - Zibs is as good as a combo gets. We cant keep everyone. If you think getting rid of Kreider is the play, that's fine, I don't.
In 2022 our dead cap money subsides and we will have a lot more room.
I think ADA would relish that assignment.
Protecting Trouba, Lindgren, and ADA is very easily the correct decision for the expansion draft. Expose Skjei and hope Seattle picks up the contract or let them take a kid like Hajek if he's still in the organization. There's absolutely no need to make a move so that Seattle doesn't select a specific player.
Assuming everyone is still here (not counting anyone that's on an expiring contract this season besides ADA/Lemieux), this is what I could imagine:
F: Panarin, Mika, Buch, Chytil, Lemieux --> two remaining spots can go to one of Kreider/Strome and Gauthier
D: Trouba, ADA, Lindgren
G: Georgiev
Lindgren requires protection. Capfriendly has an interactive tool you can play around with.Won't Lindgren be a second year NHL player who is exempt from selection?
I believe Kreider is custom made for teams whose window is wide f*cking open right now not when they need a #1 left defenseman and another scorer.True, but Kreider is probably the best conditioned and strongest player we’ve had in years. Might I remind you he can jump out of a hot tub
I’m also in the minority here probably, but I think we can compete today....we’re a piece or two and some playoff experience away IMO.
I don't see this team through the same color glasses as others. We're 4 back and now we're contenders?
All I see is a team that just cannot defend. AT ALL
Right now Shesty is looking like a young Hank... fantastic with almost zero help in front of him.
Unless he is resigned those the the ones it appears that are leftSo now it’s DAL and NYI in the lead for Kreider?
Great goalies can steal a series, but you need more than a hot goaltender to compete in the playoffs. I’ve seen some comparisons to what Shesty is doing and what the Blues accomplished last season with Binnington. But the Blues had amazing f and d depth for seasons at that point, and were high producers in the regular season. We’re starting to get some D depth. Our F depth is shit. We have a taste of reg season production. These aren’t the same situations.Exactly, but not this year . The czar has sped up everyone’s timeline.
Sh*t! I was convinced he was going to be exempt...There is a rule "All first- and second-year NHL players, and all unsigned draft choices, will be exempt from selection (and will not be counted toward protection limits." but apparently it means players in the first or second year of their ELC are exempts (Lindgren will be after 2 seasons in nhl but in the third year of his contract...)Lindgren requires protection. Capfriendly has an interactive tool you can play around with.
If Brendan Smith can do it, lets just say it probably isnt brain surgery.playing defense on your off hand is difficult. there are only a handful of dmen who can pull it off but pretty sure no one is really "comfortable" on their off side. its not like playing forward.
plus in a league where you are paid on production, taking one for the team like that could be career suicide.
could he do it ? sure.
would that make sense ? nope.
Better than abysmal is indeed better. Ask Shesty.I don't know what team you are watching but this team has defended a lot better the last 20 games. Is it perfect? No Do there need to be improvements? Yes. The eye test and numbers say this team is playing far better than earlier in the year.
playing defense on your off hand is difficult. there are only a handful of dmen who can pull it off but pretty sure no one is really "comfortable" on their off side. its not like playing forward.
plus in a league where you are paid on production, taking one for the team like that could be career suicide.
could he do it ? sure.
would that make sense ? nope.
Unless he is resigned those the the ones it appears that are left