effen
Registered User
- Jun 27, 2003
- 12,743
- 10,953
Corey Perry has an NMCShattenkirk for Perry straight up, ANA retains $2 million so that the salary is a wash. What say you?![]()
Corey Perry has an NMCShattenkirk for Perry straight up, ANA retains $2 million so that the salary is a wash. What say you?![]()
Corey Perry has an NMC
Minnesota or Buffalo IMOAnd is reportedly on his way out. LeBrun said that the Ducks are working together with Perry's camp to find a suitable trade option. Perry recently bought a multi-million dollar home in Ontario, saying that it's where he wants to raise his family. Speculation is that he wants leave Anaheim to be closer to London...
Carp was pretty adamant and sarcastic in saying he doesn’t think fox sees much if any time in Hartford. I think carp talks to graves and drury a lot.if you buyout or trade Shattenkirk, a right side of Trouba-Fox-DeAngelo is pretty darn threadbare. Yes Smith is out there somewhere, but then what? There's no RD in HFD who's ready. No one accounts for injuries. If you sign some rando vet you're in effect paying him his salary + 3M or whatever you've bought Shattenkirk for. Just picking a random crappy name, would you rather have Deryk Engelland at functionally 4.8M or Shattenkirk at 6.65?
it's why I think Fox starts and plays a lot of the year in HFD
Carp has the brain of a carpCarp was pretty adamant and sarcastic in saying he doesn’t think fox sees much if any time in Hartford. I think carp talks to graves and drury a lot.
Brooks slotted Fox in above ADA, but consider the source...if you buyout or trade Shattenkirk, a right side of Trouba-Fox-DeAngelo is pretty darn threadbare. Yes Smith is out there somewhere, but then what? There's no RD in HFD who's ready. No one accounts for injuries. If you sign some rando vet you're in effect paying him his salary + 3M or whatever you've bought Shattenkirk for. Just picking a random crappy name, would you rather have Deryk Engelland at functionally 4.8M or Shattenkirk at 6.65?
it's why I think Fox starts and plays a lot of the year in HFD
I mean, untold numbers of people slot in "new guy du jour" on the 2nd pairing when making offseason line combos. Never forget the heady days of Thomas Pock and Alexei Bereglazov, 2nd pairing defensemenBrooks slotted Fox in above ADA, but consider the source...
Also, our D7 Claesson can pitch in at RD. We could still sign Gilmour. There are other depth options than just Engelland or Shattenkirk.I mean, untold people slot in "new guy du jour" on the 2nd pairing when making offseason line combos. Never forget the heady days of Thomas Pock and Alexei Bereglazov, 2nd pairing defensemen
The larger point is if you retain or buy out Shattenkirk, you're functionally trading him for whatever depth option you go with PLUS the $3M or whatever you're not paying Shattenkirk. What depth option at 4.0, 5.25, 6.5M effective has the upside of Shattenkirk at 6.65? Probably not many, if any.Also, our D7 Claesson can pitch in at RD. We could still sign Gilmour. There are other depth options than just Engelland or Shattenkirk.
Kreider Zib Kakko
Panarin Strome Kravstov
Andersson Howden Chytil
Lemieux Nieves Fast
Traded; decent shot either he or Kreider gets moved, along with some of Names/Strome/VeseyWhere’s Buchnevich?
Kreider Zibanejad Buchnevich
Panarin Chytil Kravstov
Kakko Howden Strome
Lemieux Andersson Fast
Namestnikov traded for cap space.
Or a dingo, same diff!Good luck. I use a 'coyote' to cross the border so you better build that wall.
Understand: The Rangers are not attempting to nudge Lundqvist aside. This is not a message being sent from Manhattan to Gothenburg, Sweden, by way of The Post. Management is not about to ask the face of the franchise to waive his no-move clause. Lundqvist has made it clear that he wants to lead the Blueshirts back to the playoffs. There is no wobbling on those fronts from either the front office or the goaltender.
But what if a serious Cup contender were to come after him? What if Wilson were permitted to make a pitch? Lundqvist’s sister lives in the Bay Area. And, of course, his good friend Karlsson would be on hand to help with the transition. And he’d be playing behind a defense that, for the first time since 2011-12, would help shield him.
Again, this is an exercise in hypotheticals. The Rangers are not pushing this. So far, neither are the Sharks. Even if Wilson inquires, Lundqvist might very well decline.
Still, I wonder.
Brooks is proposing Lundqvist to the Sharks. SJ has one huge weakness in net.
https://nypost.com/2019/06/18/why-the-sharks-would-be-perfect-henrik-lundqvist-trade-partner/
Does Brooks know something? He knows Lundqvist very well.
Skjei Trouba
Hajek/Rykov Shattenkirk
Staal DeAngelo
Claesson
Is the most likely D to start the season imo
Whoever doesn't win the training camp battle for that LD spot will be in Hartford