Savant
Registered User
- Oct 3, 2013
- 39,340
- 11,981
I did. It was pretty much just that sentence though.Just listened to this whole thing and didn't hear this.
I did. It was pretty much just that sentence though.Just listened to this whole thing and didn't hear this.
WE HAVE A LEAK, FELLAS:
really? I thought they would at least need his rights since MTL has them until FA opens dont they?
sounds like a good one for one deal, especially if gibson gets dealtHe's worth a 1st the same way the Georgiev is worth a 1st.
wait Seattle is picking players already?
wait Seattle is picking players already?
Hyman is an awesome player. Just where the hell does he fit and WITH WHAT CAP SPACE???????????????(Shrug)
I like Zach Hyman the player.
He's an even strength scoring machine. He pretty much gets all of his production at 5 on 5 which we need more of.
They submitted the picks to the NHL and the NHLPA at 10am this morning. Now they have a little more than 24 hours to inform everyone, get the players prepared... and do this kind of stuff 30x for the actual announcement show.wait Seattle is picking players already?
No, the NHL is going to announce some of the picks and incorporate Seattle landmarks and people within that. So they are clearly pretaping some of them.wait Seattle is picking players already?
wait Seattle is picking players already?
Give him 7x6
we need toughness and work ethic
Hyman is an awesome player. Just where the hell does he fit and WITH WHAT CAP SPACE???????????????
They're due tomorrow, not todayThey submitted the picks to the NHL and the NHLPA at 10am this morning. Now they have a little more than 24 hours to inform everyone, get the players prepared... and do this kind of stuff 30x for the actual announcement show.
Or where does he play? I frankly can't understand how we are linked to some of these wingers, unless we are going to ship out Buch AND Kakko/Kravtsov for a package on Eichel.Hyman is an awesome player. Just where the hell does he fit and WITH WHAT CAP SPACE???????????????
There is a <1% chance of this happening IMO. We're not trading a 1st for a 13F type guy.Will be physically ill if we give up a first round pick for Nick Deslaurier
There is a <1% chance of this happening IMO. We're not trading a 1st for a 13F type guy.
Friedman speculated if Deslauriers may fetch a first round pick. Then Marek asked if maybe a team in the Metro, perhaps that just signed Goodrow may be interested in Deslauriers to address their Tom Wilson problem. Just speculation.
I meant for the Rangers. Buffalo is a lost cause.Nothing they get will increase their sales revenues for next year, least of all an unhappy player who publicly doesn't want to be there. I'm not sure why this trade is going to be the straw that breaks the camels back for a team that has only known disorder and disfunction for the large majority of its existence and has a current playoff drought of over 10 years at this point.
Also, regarding Eichel..... someone in the last thread said "What would Aho or Barzal have done on Buffalo the past 6 years?" in regard to comparison with Eichel.
And I actually do believe if Barzal or Aho had been on the Sabres for the last 6 years, they might have at least had 1 playoff appearance, which they didn't have with Eichel.
Again, it's not that Eichel isn't fabulously skilled or that he doesn't put up PPG or more stats. He would qualify for both of those things.
But what I haven't seen from him is the drive to win, to sacrifice his game and offensive stats, if necessary for a win. Which I believe, just using my eyes, is something both Barzal and Aho do for their respective teams. And part of the reason why their teams do so well, aside from being talented teams. Well, in the case of Barzal, it might not be so much talent as chemistry and good coaching, but either way.
I still stick to my Tavares comparison for Eichel. Great talents, great stats, great fantasy players, but questionable drive and ability to carry a team towards a playoff spot in the NHL, And unless a player can do that, I am not sure if the Rangers need them. We have enough pure talent as is. We need to find chemistry and the drive to win games. So I don't see it being a wise option to a) trade possible future, star prospects and b) Pay top dollar in salary, against the cap for a center that doesn't bring those winning qualities.
I could be wrong about Eichel. But I don't think he's proven me wrong YET. Tavares on the other hand, has shown time and time he's just not the type of player to push or carry a team on his back. And I wouldn't want to pay like 8-11 mil a season for Tavares either. What we really need on this team now is a John Toews type of player, not necessarily a guy who can put up 90 points a season, but a guy who will do his best to make his teammates better and do his best to get the win. And that could come in a less spectacular, less prolific scoring type of center. Which shouldn't cost us as much in a trade or against the cap. People mentioned Larkin, and maybe he could be that guy. But if I had to pick the ideal center I think we need right now, it would probably be Bo Horvat. A player I would absolutely love to get. But likely zero chance the Canucks would trade him for anything reasonable. Schenn might be another one.
And I see a bit of that mentality I think in Dvorak. Who also seems a bit underrated if this thread is any sign. All though he probably wouldn't be at the top of my "we should trade for them" list. Similarly, Danault or even Gourde. If we want to be thrifty. Larkin might be good, but can't see Yzerman moving him now after he's become captain. Might even consider like, Ryan Johansen if we could get him at a discount. It's kind of all relative to the price we would have to pay though, as usual.
I forsee Strome going for a draft pick and Buchnevich going for an ELC player.
Ryan Reaves fetched a 1stso did Paul Gaustaud back in the day