Speculation: Roster Building Thread XI

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Or with Chytil. Let him win the draws.
That’s going to be the real interesting thing. He’s primarily been used as a LW. If they plan to deploy him on the left, it will likely be on 4th line
LaF
Panarin
Kreider
Ahead of him.
If they use him as a RW, he could be deployed on 3rd line with Kreids/Chytil.
Right now I think we are def looking at a wing not being here to start the year. Whether it’s Buch/ Kravtsov /kakko etc
Is Barron a C? Is he a 3rd or 4th line guy? Does Richards come up and play 4th line? He looked good in his cup of coffee. Rooney staying?
Way too many balls still in the air.
Drury still has at least 2 more irons in the fire imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NYRangers16
Seems like a puzzle could be piecing together.....if Kracken take Tarasenko and rangers have a trade in place to get whatever center they covet weather it's Eichel or whomever. Obviously Kravy goes in Eichel deal or Buch in another center deal mix and match but you get the gist. Now deal with the Kracken giving one of the two wingers that are left for Tarasenko and maybe the damn we covet. Tarasenko being breadys buddy. So many scenarios.

Btw just an opinion question but as annoying troubled entitled as he is if the rangers toughed up the bottom 6 etc. Would anyone find a line exciting of Bread Kusnetsov and Tarasenko????

I'm kind of curious but would depend on all other moves.

Love the goody trade though and yea Coleman would be awesome.
 
Then again Horvat is only signed for 2 years and I doubt VAN is winning with him (without re signing him), but then they wouldn't with Buchnevich either, so it dont make sense
 
  • Like
Reactions: NoQuitInNewMexico
That’s going to be the real interesting thing. He’s primarily been used as a LW. If they plan to deploy him on the left, it will likely be on 4th line
LaF
Panarin
Kreider
Ahead of him.
If they use him as a RW, he could be deployed on 3rd line with Kreids/Chytil.
Right now I think we are def looking at a wing not being here to start the year. Whether it’s Buch/ Kravtsov /kakko etc
Is Barron a C? Is he a 3rd or 4th line guy? Does Richards come up and play 4th line? He looked good in his cup of coffee. Rooney staying?
Way too many balls still in the air
Pretty sure Goodrow was RW with the Lightning

All 3 forwards on Tampas 3rd line could play every position
 
Either way, it won't be official until Seattle finishes their draft. As long as Goodrow has expiry status, we don't have to protect him.

and if there is really close to a deal in place, then he likely wouldn't go to Seattle (they wont be Rangers good any time soon)
 
Pretty sure Goodrow was RW with the Lightning

All 3 forwards on Tampas 3rd line could play every position
Yea he plays all 3.
But mainly they were deployed as
Goodrow-Gourde-Coleman
Goodrow on left side.
I can’t see them playing him 3 mill a year to be a primarily 4th liner. I think he’ll spend some time there, he’s never got more then 30 pts I believe so he’s not some offensive beast. I’m really interested to see how/where gallant sees him in our line up going fwd
 
@Edge Got any of them free Buch updates.. IM JONESIN MAN

iu

Haven’t been checking because I am moving. But there’s interest in him around the league - especially out west.
 
Can anyone explain how the rangers would choose to protect Rooney or Blackwell of Gauthier? I mean at best even through potential and being a first rounder with size etc everyone thinks they can change everyone he would have more value in a trade package alone.

I don't think the Kracken would be to keen on picking Blackwell or Rooney.

Lastly I may be to high on Gauthier but I can see him improving and playing like a Tuch with possibly better scoring touch but less sandpaper. Maybe they can get that out of him but potential exists.....the other two I like but come one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cag29
turning into Carp with the Captain Obvious generalizations ;)

In all seriousness, much appreciated.

Now if we can get those who don’t know hockey beyond their PS3 system to stop offering their opinion, the value of content here would go way up.

Always weird because sometimes I think something is well known and people are surprised by it. I’ll use Buch as an example - him being a trade possibility shouldn’t really be a surprise, and yet it is for some fans.
 
If true that would be a pretty amazing deal

This can't possibly be the deal. Because if it was true, why wouldn't the Rangers do this? Buch is a great winger for us. But Horvat is captain material and a center and exactly the kind of player our top 9 needs. If we lose out on point production so be it. Horvat is skilled heart and soul.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad