Synergy27
F-A-C-G-C-E
Consider yourself involved.I don't want to get involved in whatever you guys have going on, but my understanding of why the 'stats nerds' use 5v5 and 5v4 rather than EV and PP is that it provides a 'clearer' picture over time as it eliminates the rarer events that can skew the stats. 4v4 hockey doesn't happen very often so is considered 'different', so the argument is that 5v5 provides better insights than if you include 4v4 like EV would (and if EV includes the 3v3 OT then it gets even further away from 'normal' hockey).
In the same way, including 5v3 in PP stats can skew the data based on a relatively rare event.
![Smiling face with sunglasses :sunglasses: 😎](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@14.0.2/assets/72x72/1f60e.png)
I can see that. I haven’t done the full calculation, but I can’t imagine that the limited sample of other than 5 on 5 even strength play would skew the numbers all that much.
According to naturalstattrick, his xGF% over the last two playoffs combined is 42.86% at ES and 38.29% at 5v5. So actually worse at 5v5 overall, implying that he’s pretty good at 4v4 which makes sense given the extra open ice.
These numbers are horrid any way you slice them, and they agree with the eye test and the simple production stats.