Roster Building Thread VI (2022-23): Offseason edition

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are seriously going to compare Leetch to Fox maybe you should do it without stats. Are you going to tell me that Fox skated harder or faster on defense than Leetch? Are you really thinking Fox is a top Dman of all time? I like Fox but but some of the hype based on a ton of PP assists goes too far. Did you watch him vs NJ?

Like I said, I'm not going to go back and forth with you about this and making a dopey "did you watch" argument is beneath you. I watch EVERY Rangers game, thank you.

Fox isn't Leetch. Leetch isn't Fox. And Fox's career is far from being over or ready for that comparison. Let's move on.
 
Like I said, I'm not going to go back and forth with you about this and making a dopey "did you watch" argument is beneath you. I watch EVERY Rangers game, thank you.

Fox isn't Leetch. Leetch isn't Fox. And Fox's career is far from being over or ready for that comparison. Let's move on.
Im glad you support Fox. I like when our fans support our players. Im not bashing Fox. I just want to see him put the same effort on defense that he does on offense. In a perfect world Fox, Laf and KK would all attend a power skating bootcamp for a month or two so they can be at their best next season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DekeR
Like I said, I'm not going to go back and forth with you about this and making a dopey "did you watch" argument is beneath you. I watch EVERY Rangers game, thank you.

Fox isn't Leetch. Leetch isn't Fox. And Fox's career is far from being over or ready for that comparison. Let's move on.

It's funny how the 2 guys careers have mirrored each other so far. Both had a Norris and 2 other top 5 finishes before age 25. At basically this exact point in both guys careers, the Rangers came off a breakout season (91-92, 21-22) only to finish without a series win the next season. Led to the firing of a successful head coach (Neilson/Gallant). Now who is our Mike Keenan (Babcock?) and how do we get history to continue repeating itself?
 
I could pick out a 100 guys who underwhelmed and never met expectations. Lafreniere and Bennett are different players.
Sure, and it's fine to say he's underwhelmed but half these posts are saying he's a bust and he's not a player. Meanwhile a guy most would love to have on our team now didn't break 40 points until he was 25. I just think it's foolish to give up on a 21 years old and high draft pick. Unless a team absolutely blows you away with an offer or you get a similar cost controlled asset that fits a need like a C. Geekie, Tomasino etc... Has Laf, KK been disappointing? Sure, but just like everyone was sick of Chytil before he had a good season (and we're back to wanting him gone?) I just think it's all reactionary from a horrible playoffs, when the whole team besides Shesty was brutal. We all wanted a Hughes, Petterson, Tchachuk out of them, but unfortunately that's not who they are. They've been perfectly fine on the 3rd line, they're cheaper than most other 3rd line options, and I think they still have room to grow. I might be wrong and most will prob say I am but one bad playoffs after a pretty great one last season doesn't mean they won't be good, and shouldn't be shipped off for a late 1st in a draft that will have good players but IMO has a drop off in the 20 range.
 
We had two marquee players trying to fit in and the rest of the squad trying to accommodate the transition. Instead of playing their game with a chemistry that already existed we regressed and made the newcomers the focal point of the team. Poor upper management and the typical results from an organization bent on repeating the same song and expecting a new upbeat version.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UnparalledPark
We had two marquee players trying to fit in and the rest of the squad trying to accommodate the transition. Instead of playing their game with a chemistry that already existed we regressed and made the newcomers the focal point of the team. Poor upper management and the typical results from an organization bent on repeating the same song and expecting a new upbeat version.

Tarasenko was a good move and exactly what they needed; Mikkola & Motte as well. Kane was a bridge to far in hindsight. I do believe that Kane was something Dolan wanted but Kane also wanted the NYR which complicated things. Drury was caught between a rock and a hard place. Trade for Kane and fail, he takes the heat. Don't trade for Kane and fail, he takes the heat.

That being said I still think Dolan's influence is overstated. I dont think what he wants will affect the coaching search or what they do this offseason. Major moves aren't needed, but we will find out who is really calling the shots based on the coaching hire. If it's Sullivan/Knoblauch/Leach, I think Drury has autonomy. If it's Babcock or any of the other retread coaches, that would concern me.
 
Lol, we’re not making any changes the way things stand now. We’re basically pot committed and the only way we can do anything is by shedding Goodrow.

Krieder Mika Kakko
Laf Chytil Goodrow
Panarin Trocheck Vesey
Edstrom Brodz Cuylle
(Lesch)

Lindgren Fox
Miller Trouba
Jones Schmeider
Harpur

Igor / Domingue
 
And the forwards



Rangers with 7 of the top 30 WORST and zero of the top 30 Best.

Eye test matches

Motte sucks. Never got the obsession with him.

I get wanting to add a player like Motte, but maybe, Idk, one with talent.

People throw the name Carl Hagelin around. Motte couldn't lace prime Hagelin's skates.
 
Motte sucks. Never got the obsession with him.

I get wanting to add a player like Motte, but maybe, Idk, one with talent.

People throw the name Carl Hagelin around. Motte couldn't lace prime Hagelin's skates.

Hagelin was a 3rd line player who was a puck hound. Motte is a 4th line player. They aren't similar really.

I like Motte for what he is. He's got good speed, he is actually surprisingly difficult to get the puck around as he uses his body and stick very well, he's a good PKer. I wouldn't pay a lot for him but I could see signing him as a staple on he 4th line for a bit.

In saying that, as you have mentioned and I agree with, I wouldn't get attached to any 4th liner if their demands start to inflate.
 
Motte sucks. Never got the obsession with him.

I get wanting to add a player like Motte, but maybe, Idk, one with talent.

People throw the name Carl Hagelin around. Motte couldn't lace prime Hagelin's skates.
Motte is fine, but not a player I am ever playing a premium on to keep. If I need a Motte type I am renting it at the deadline. The issue is the Rangers can’t develop their own 4th liners; but maybe Knoblauch has something cooking at Hartford
 
Motte is fine, but not a player I am ever playing a premium on to keep. If I need a Motte type I am renting it at the deadline. The issue is the Rangers can’t develop their own 4th liners; but maybe Knoblauch has something cooking at Hartford
Idk we had Gauthier who was the same player except he blew scoring chances so everyone hated him. Somehow getting more chances is bad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: surlysailor
Tarasenko was a good move and exactly what they needed; Mikkola & Motte as well. Kane was a bridge to far in hindsight. I do believe that Kane was something Dolan wanted but Kane also wanted the NYR which complicated things. Drury was caught between a rock and a hard place. Trade for Kane and fail, he takes the heat. Don't trade for Kane and fail, he takes the heat.

That being said I still think Dolan's influence is overstated. I dont think what he wants will affect the coaching search or what they do this offseason. Major moves aren't needed, but we will find out who is really calling the shots based on the coaching hire. If it's Sullivan/Knoblauch/Leach, I think Drury has autonomy. If it's Babcock or any of the other retread coaches, that would concern me.
No doubt I am with you, but I am looking at the roster building for the POs and the addition of these players. When the NJDs were top 5 in the league in goals and we were like top 12 or so, not much difference between the two high 280s low 270s and it just didn't justify the want for more scoring. We knew we were playing the NJDs and you bring in two older players that cannot favorably make a difference. I really like Tarasenko's acquisition but at the same time you bring in 2/3rds of an additional top 6 line and where are you supposed to put the original top 6? and not mess with the kid line. It was ill conceived and redundant and without adding character you created a lineup and chemistry problem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McRanger92
Idk we had Gauthier who was the same player except he blew scoring chances so everyone hated him. Somehow getting more chances is bad.
The issue I had with Gauthier was not at 5v5, it was that he didn't PK. If I'm building a team, all of my 4th liners must PK.
Yeah this is kind of where I stand on that too. Gauthier basically was just a worse version of Motte. I don’t know if I agree that 4th liners have to PK, but I need them offering some other kind of value and I need hockey IQ. Didn’t think Gauthier had either of those in spades. Cannot have guys that kill you when they are out there
 
Idk we had Gauthier who was the same player except he blew scoring chances so everyone hated him. Somehow getting more chances is bad.
Not everyone hated him. I thought he should've been given a shot on lines 2 & 3 when the team was sleep walking in late November, early December. He was drawing a penalty a game, plus his speed & energy were noticeable almost every shift he took the ice. And he was such an easy kid to root for. I hated giving him up in the Motte deal.
 
Not everyone hated him. I thought he should've been given a shot on lines 2 & 3 when the team was sleep walking in late November, early December. He was drawing a penalty a game, plus his speed & energy were noticeable almost every shift he took the ice. And he was such an easy kid to root for. I hated giving him up in the Motte deal.
Yeah, I still had hope he could have been like a Hagelin/Pouliot type for us in the right system.
 
He should have PK'd. That was never tried and it's very odd to not try that with a forward with his speed.
Never understood this, he should've been an ideal PKer. If NYR could teach Buch, CK to be pkers why not teach the kid positioning. He had a lot of desirable attributes to be a good pker. He had speed, size and strength. Positioning was the one thing he could be taught but never was given a shot.
 
Panarin/Trocheck/Chytil. Chytil is the only one of the kids who is always trying to find the soft spots in the defense to shoot which gives Panarin a target. Take away the center responsbility from him and unleash him offensively. Him and Trocheck are fast enough to get in and win dump and chases so we can avoid Panarin's blue line and curl bs. New coach needs to tell Tro and Chytil not to give the puck to Panarin in the neutral zone. Use their speed to get the puck deep and then give it to Panarin. Let Goodrow center the third line or trade him and find a cheaper center. Chytil and Trocheck are signed for a long time now and they are both too good to be a third line center. Chytil's speed is desperately needed in the top six.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FUZfan
No doubt I am with you, but I am looking at the roster building for the POs and the addition of these players. When the NJDs were top 5 in the league in goals and we were like top 12 or so, not much difference between the two high 280s low 270s and it just didn't justify the want for more scoring. We knew we were playing the NJDs and you bring in two older players that cannot favorably make a difference. I really like Tarasenko's acquisition but at the same time you bring in 2/3rds of an additional top 6 line and where are you supposed to put the original top 6? and not mess with the kid line. It was ill conceived and redundant and without adding character you created a lineup and chemistry problem.

The biggest effect of Kane was neutering Zibanejad on the power play. They moved him to the bumper so Kane and Panarin could be comfortable. We know Mika is an introspective player who thrives on the confidence gained from him (and Kreider) scoring on the PP. he was humming in his office toward the end of the season but of course he was the "good teammate" and went with it. That is fully on the coaching staff letting the veterans dictate the strategy. Panarin & Zibanejad shouldnt be in positions to influence their roles positively or negatively, and that's why a new voice is needed.

If they put Kane on the 3rd line with Kreider & Trocheck, and split the PP units evenly, it wouldve worked out much better, because he and Tarasenko were never meant to be saviors. Unfortunately Gallant and the vets handled it terribly and completely ignored the Kids and Trocheck all series. Whatever coach can come in and get this group to actually play as a team will be very successful.
 
Panarin/Trocheck/Chytil. Chytil is the only one of the kids who is always trying to find the soft spots in the defense to shoot which gives Panarin a target. Take away the center responsbility from him and unleash him offensively. Him and Trocheck are fast enough to get in and win dump and chases so we can avoid Panarin's blue line and curl bs. New coach needs to tell Tro and Chytil not to give the puck to Panarin in the neutral zone. Use their speed to get the puck deep and then give it to Panarin. Let Goodrow center the third line or trade him and find a cheaper center. Chytil and Trocheck are signed for a long time now and they are both too good to be a third line center. Chytil's speed is desperately needed in the top six.

I like Panarin with Chytil a lot but I think Trocheck's skill set is wasted as a babysitter for Panarin. Chytil just needs to improve his faceoffs to a respectable level and Drury needs to add a speedy, physical forechecker to the RW. Ive championed Fast, but i've seen other good suggestions of guys who arent necessarily "Top 6" wingers, but they'd fill the role (Garland, Hathaway, Haula, etc.) Panarin has had his most 5v5 success with right handed RW (Fast/Blackwell).
 
No Ranger (sans Igor) looked good in the playoffs and with it being such a small sample size it seems like a weird thing to judge him on.
What makes a 2C in your opinion, and are there close to 32 of them in the league?
There's certainly more to it than points, but I feel they are a large part of it and seeing as he scored the same no. of 5v5 pts as Mika, and only 22 centers in the whole NHL scored more than him, I'm starting to worry that we don't have a single center worth having on the team...
I love Mika and I like Vinny, I don't care about reg season as much as others, and I felt the entire time we needed Mika, X, Vinny and hope chytil was ready to be the X. He wasn't, Vinny was asked to do more than he should be (and did well overall) but for this team to do what it wants to do Vinny should not be the 2c come playoff time. This isn't just about point totals. He plays too many minutes a game and after a stretch he starts to make so many metal mistakes it negates the good he does.

I want him with Panarin. He can actually finish.



You could sell me on Haula for that line
Chytil is not a natural finisher. In fact none of the three of the kids is at this point. All have average or below average shots.
 
that is the only reason i think he might still be here. his play, positional need, contract outlook, ect certainly does not point to him needing to stay here. the only reason he is still here is his draft position. outside of that he has no utility to this team or roster at this point which is incredibly sad


agreed, but if they want to make a change, this is the easiest change to make to a roster that is completely landlocked. a complete mess. this is exactly what i warned about last summer when they signed trocheck and boxed them into this core...
Well, to be honest, if we ignore his draft position, a D+3 21 year old getting practically no PP time playing with two other young players also still finding their games, getting 15:15 per game who scored at a .48PPG clip, has showed flashes of highlight reel skill, and was second among forwards with 141 hits, certainly DOES have value to the team. The issue as I see it is his current value/level of play in relation to his draft position. If he had been picked 29OA we'd all be pretty thrilled with him. Well most of us. Hahahaha. Instead, most of us, myself included, are disappointed. He's still a valuable player, just not 1OA valuable. But also he would certainly not be the first high pick to blossom outside of his D+1-3 if he can manage to do so. We will see. One way or the other.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad