SA16
Sixstring
Nosek is pretty bad and makes more money than the guys we signed I am not sure why there would be any interest.
Remember when Vegas’ ready made roster had the lowest o/u point total in the league? I do!I will say this about Vegas (and Seattle): because of the new expansion rules they got handed readymade deep rosters that just needed to be augmented.
You can't apply that team-building strategy to anybody else.
What is this based on? They're comparable players based on stats and they're similar sizes. Different styles though Pitlick is a faster skater more of an energy, disruptive guy whereas Nosek is more of a lumbering tougher style. I think Pitlick's style of play was more needed than Nosek's.Would have preferred him Pitlick. Pitlick isn't that good at all.
Nosek stinks.Would have preferred him Pitlick. Pitlick isn't that good at all.
Because silly, another team signed him and he has to be better than the comparative player that the Rangers signed. Duh.What is this based on? They're comparable players based on stats and they're similar sizes. Different styles though Pitlick is a faster skater more of an energy, disruptive guy whereas Nosek is more of a lumbering tougher style. I think Pitlick's style of play was more needed than Nosek's.
They're both fringe down the lineup players but I think it's reasonable to say that Pitlick is the better player AND he makes 210k less than Nosek (787k vs 1m).
Pitlick and Bonino are both better than Nosek and they both signed for less (787k and 800k).
Do the hard work to break into the class of 2-3-4 favorites up front, and those teams win like 70% of the Cups. Establish yourself in that contender class and you are way more likely to get one.
I will say this about Vegas (and Seattle): because of the new expansion rules they got handed readymade deep rosters that just needed to be augmented.
You can't apply that team-building strategy to anybody else.
Turns out that when you have a bunch of middle-6 and 2nd pairing guys, you actually have a semi-decent team. Obviously they got lucky with some of those picks.-However-
They got to choose either the 8th best forward, the 4th best defenseman, or the 2nd best goalie from their choices.
I mean, I realize it's not THAT simple, but they were successful because of a system and bunch of middling NHL'ers and finding gold in a few reclamation projects.
You know he signed go Carolina right?I think itd be worth it to bring in brendan lemeiux on a PTO. Good fit for our 4th line and brings some much needed grit to this team if he shows out in camp. Ideal 13th forward to insert when team is dead which happens far too often with this group
Missed that one. Hes a good 4th liner. Bunting tda and pepe there is gonna make them a fun team to watch and totally change their complexionYou know he signed go Carolina right?
And he sucks so no thank you even if he was FA
Our condolences
Our condolences
Going into the playoffs, Vegas was the 7th most "favored" team to win the Cup according to Vegas odds.
no, we should notYou can break up the kid line without forcing Mika to be a babysitter
Nah, you don't. They don't come up too often, and you might wait another 80 years for one. You're more likely to find good prospects in a draft, then it's up to you to develop them into stars. If you want to wait around for a generational player who just steps in and dominates from the moment he enters the league, be prepared to tank for a long time. And even then you might not get one. You can look at plenty of examples around the league.Eventually you'll find a Kane or Malkin or two.
Perhaps you missed the part where I said there are outliers.
It's just not the good odds.
And it's why we keep rolling snake eyes.
We don't have the luck.
We need to build a powerhouse.
Luck has gotten us 1 Cup win in 80 years.
If we just sucked it up and continued to stockpile, the odds would be way more in our favor. You aren't going to keep drafting busts forever. Eventually you'll find a Kane or Malkin or two. It's better to wait your turn until you get stars in the draft and then go full steam ahead. The outlier approach has gotten us ..... 1 Cup in 80 years.
That darned ol' bad luck. Rats. I guess we'll just roll the dice with an inferior 5v5 roster again next year, shucks.
no, we should not
chemistry
kid line = 1st line
for now, Krieder-Zib-Othmann or Wheeler
prob Cuyle - Tro - bread
Imagine the cap space if they had Howden at 1.9 instead of Goodrow at 3.6. They’d just waste it on another old vet
Nah, you don't. They don't come up too often, and you might wait another 80 years for one. You're more likely to find good prospects in a draft, then it's up to you to develop them into stars. If you want to wait around for a generational player who just steps in and dominates from the moment he enters the league, be prepared to tank for a long time. And even then you might not get one. You can look at plenty of examples around the league.
So, just keep drafting and hope for a different kind of luck - ie... drafting a generational player.
Got it.
How many generational forwards have the Rangers drafted, even when they have high (or the highest) draft picks, in their history?
Z-E-R-O
Sounds like a great plan. That dart is going to hit the bullseye sooner or later, right? Right?