Roster Building Thread VI (2022-23): Offseason edition

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
So you wouldn’t take Marchand Zuccarello, Gallagher, JAM or Poiint because they are small.
You are pointing out exceptions and not rules. Also, adding Yamamoto to the bottom 6 is a waste and he’s not good enough for the top 6 which is why Edmonton is willing to move him. It’s also why we went be involved. That’s forgetting EDM has a cap crunch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RGY
Vegas and Florida were both heavy teams. Yamamoto doesn’t sniff the jock of one guy you mentioned. There’s a reason Edmonton fans constantly try to pawn him off in proposals. Size isn’t everything, but this team needs more, not less.

If he’s not producing with McDavid or Drai then he’s probably not producing much with Chytil.
Julien Gauhtier had all the size and speed in the world, didn't make him a consistent nhl player
 
Some Dman on the cheap anyway
OEL at 1 million sure. Anything more probably let him go elsewhere . This would be a good team for him to try and raise his value though

Since Jones has a waiver option he could go up and down a bit
I was under the impression that Jones would require waivers.

Just play Jones with Harpur as the 7th.
 
You are pointing out exceptions and not rules. Also, adding Yamamoto to the bottom 6 is a waste and he’s not good enough for the top 6 which is why Edmonton is willing to move him. It’s also why we went be involved. That’s forgetting EDM has a cap crunch.
Unfortunately, on the Rangers he would be a top 6 RW.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RangersFan1994
What is everyone's opinion on Craig Smith? He was a pretty decently regarded player going in to last year. He really struggled with only 16 points in 64 games. He's 33 and in the past 3 years his numbers are:

16 points in 64 games

36 points in 74 games

32 points in 54 games

His possession numbers at 5v5 are actually pretty good throughout his career. In Washington to finish the season he was positive in CF% and FF%.

Could he be a temporary solution at RW for this team to bridge a year or two? He's probably looking at peanuts for a contract.

1687187334949.png
 
As much as I want better depth at forward, or a player like Engvall...

I'd rather spend that money upgrading our defense. Whether it's an upgrade on Lindgren or a player that would drop him down in the lineup.
 
As much as I want better depth at forward, or a player like Engvall...

I'd rather spend that money upgrading our defense. Whether it's an upgrade on Lindgren or a player that would drop him down in the lineup.

I think if given the choice between Engvall and Gustafsson, I would choose Gustafsson. In saying that, I am not enamored with any of the UFA d-men this off-season so if the plan is to roll with Jones and have a vet 7th like De Haan or someone like that, I'm game.
 
As much as I want better depth at forward, or a player like Engvall...

I'd rather spend that money upgrading our defense. Whether it's an upgrade on Lindgren or a player that would drop him down in the lineup.

Hopefully Miller is that player. And perhaps a steadier Lindgren helps improve Trouba's game?
 
I saw Zac Jone's AHL card earlier in this thread, can anyone pull Scanlin's? Based on reports he was the Pack's best overall d-man. I'm curious if we are all underselling his opportunity to snag a spot
 
To me, this is a most unusual off season. In years past, I had a definitive checklist of things that I thought needed to be done. That included adds and subtractions. This year, it’s not so easy.

I’m ambivalent about the coaching change. I liked Gallant and his easy going style. I don’t buy the argument that we needed tougher practices. That’s not what the modern athlete typically says. As for tactics, I thought his system was fine and he made appropriate changes. Some of the amateur coaches here tend to overthink things. Gallant was reasonably responsive to what was happening on the ice. All of the strategic changes in the world don’t change how the players are performIng.

I thought Brooks put it well…Laviolette is a competent professional coach. As uninspiring as the choice seems, that is true.

So now what?

Well, given the constraints of the cap, any major changes depends on how they evaluate their own significant players. Are they OK with Lafreniere or is it possible he is moved? Would they trade Chytil? Can they make a fair deal with Miller? Do they see Schneider as a future building block or an overrated young player? Could they force an (expensive) move with a piece of the veteran core? And on and on.

I have my own evaluations but I’m not ready to go full Vegas and trade too many young players for veterans. The proven core is starting to age. Some young players have to step up and carry the flag. Sooner rather than later.

Drury is clearly on the hot seat this year and beyond. He has to make the decisions I outlined above. I’m sure he already knows where he wants to go.

He better be right.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad