The panarin takes here are insane haha. In his four seasons with nyr, he been well above a ppg player for us. Hes our best ufa signing of all time.
Can he be frustrating at times? Sure. But the insanity has to stop
Panarin has 20 points in 30 playoff games as a Ranger.
Over the past two playoffs, he has 8 points in 27 games at 5v5.
Over the past two playoffs, his xGF% in all situations (which means including the PP where he is still pretty good) is 48.5% (i.e., net negative). His HDCF% is at 45.5%.
At 5v5 those numbers drop to an astonishing 38.3% and 35.7% respectively.
At 5v5 in the playoffs, 65% of the high danger chances occur for the other team when Panarin is in the ice. That’s an insane number.
Connor McDavid’s numbers are 57.8 and 58.9%.
I admit that this next statement is somewhat of a stretch, but only somewhat.
At 5v5, Connor McDavid’s team has 58.9% of the high danger chances when he is on the ice (again playoff stats). The point of hockey is to score goals, and this is usually done by creating high danger chances.
When Panarin is on the ice, the other team, which has never had a player of McDavid’s caliber on it given Rangers opponents in the past two playoffs, produces high danger chances at a significantly higher rate than McDavid himself does (65% vs. 58%). Again, a stretch here, but you can argue that having Panarin on the ice at 5v5, turning the puck over the way he does, is essentially spotting the opponent a player/line that is better than McDavid at creating HDCF.
I could not care less that Bread is a PPG player in the regular season. He actively hurts the team in the playoffs and I don’t see how or why that changes moving forward.
You might want to think on which take is actually insane.