Why would the ducks do that? They have a franchise corner stone and they are trading him for a 32 year old winger and a 1oa pick that looks like a 3rs liner?The only way I trade Laffy if it's like Panarin and Laffy for Zegras.
No other deal makes any sense.
I'm not saying they would. It's the only type of deal that I'd trade Laffy for.Why would the ducks do that? They have a franchise corner stone and they are trading him for a 32 year old winger and a 1oa pick that looks like a 3rs liner?
Panarin and Strome connection plus if they get Bedard it’s his team. Zegras may bolt first chance he gets.Why would the ducks do that? They have a franchise corner stone and they are trading him for a 32 year old winger and a 1oa pick that looks like a 3rs liner?
Why would zegras "bolt" from a team that potentially has McTavish, bedard, z and has elite skill that can grow up together. It's like suggesting draisaitl considered "bolting" when the oilers landed McDavidPanarin and Strome connection plus if they get Bedard it’s his team. Zegras may bolt first chance he gets.
EJ Hradek said there his rift between the front office and the coaching staff. Each side wanted different things. He expects the Rangers to hire Quenneville if Bettman allows him to return because the Rangers have a lot of money invested in certain players and they need those players to produce. Dark days are coming.
Short of a very public, in person, tearful apology to Kyle Beach, I honestly think I'm taking a break from rooting for this team if Quenneville is the coach.I hope every group brings a shit storm on the Rangers for hiring Quenneville.
9 top six forwards? Where?EJ Hradek said there his rift between the front office and the coaching staff. Each side wanted different things. He expects the Rangers to hire Quenneville if Bettman allows him to return because the Rangers have a lot of money invested in certain players and they need those players to produce. Dark days are coming.
Drury built a collection of stars and not a team. No surprise. The Rangers have 9 top six forwards. That’s too much. Not a very balanced team.
I'd trade him for pennies on the dollar before it becomes Venezuelan Bolivars on the dollarI'm not saying they would. It's the only type of deal that I'd trade Laffy for.
There's zero reason to move him for pennies on the dollar. It's irrational
9 top six forwards? Where?
All I have to say is if they plan on keeping this train rolling, we're going to need to start scouring the UDFA market for affordable viable options at forwards before too long.
We just don't have enough of a prospect pipeline left.
I said it earlier but Lafreniere scored at a 3rd line rate and doesn't move the needle driving play. Chytil sure and Kakko is borderline. So I could see 5 or 6, but not 9.I think insofar as 40 points is seen as low-end 2nd line production, he's making the case that Kakko and Laf are top 6 players.
I think NYR has 8, but is about to have 6.
Panarin, Zib, Kreider, Trocheck, Chytil, Kakko
Vesey and Goodrow are set to be 2/3rds of the 3rd line again if no additions are made. People always used to say it's better to build around center than wing, at least we are strong in that department.
EJ Hradek said there his rift between the front office and the coaching staff. Each side wanted different things. He expects the Rangers to hire Quenneville if Bettman allows him to return because the Rangers have a lot of money invested in certain players and they need those players to produce. Dark days are coming.
Drury built a collection of stars and not a team. No surprise. The Rangers have 9 top six forwards. That’s too much. Not a very balanced team.
If they bring back the same defense with just Zac Jones it might work if Jones takes a huge step forward, but even then eh. And who knows if Jones will even get a chance. But yeah it would be typical for this FO to fail to understand what the real problem is with this roster.I’m not even necessarily against trading Lafreniere.
And I get there are a lot of limitations on what Drury can accomplish.
But if the only consequential “shake up” is trading Lafreniere/Kakko it would be so classic Rangers it hurts. Can’t even diagnose the right problems let alone the right solutions. I doubt they even consider changes to the d corps.
My biggest issue is that the limitations that exist on what he can do we're directly created by him. He knew what this cap outlook was, he knew who is going to need raises and when, and he still needs the decision to commit money to certain guys for certain terms in light of that without making other adjustments to ensure some sort of flexibility. People can bitch and moan all they want about what he inherited, but the bottom line is that when he was hired he had a plan in place and he had to know the outlook that was there. He has done nothing to properly navigate that and instead decided to make commitments that only boxed him into this core. And now if he wants to change things and get out of this court in any manner he is going to have to piss assets away like crazy to get out of some of these commitments. Again not all of these contracts are his fault, but he has compounded the issues that already existed here with percentages and terms by boxing this entire roster in to a committed window. He has to wear some of this as wellI’m not even necessarily against trading Lafreniere.
And I get there are a lot of limitations on what Drury can accomplish.
But if the only consequential “shake up” is trading Lafreniere/Kakko it would be so classic Rangers it hurts. Can’t even diagnose the right problems let alone the right solutions. I doubt they even consider changes to the d corps.