Or trouba or fox's best assets will be wasted here. Let's see what we've got in Nils first. If he turns to be the next Lidstrom (not offensively, but a mainstay top pairing D for 15 years and part of the team leadership) you won't be happy he was ever moved in lieu of moving other D. The thing with Nils that makes him someone to hold as long as possible -- unlike Schneider or Robertson or Miller, there are no questions about Nils' hockey IQ... in any zone of the ice. Furthermore Schneider and Robertson had the benefit of playing against kids that are half their size. Whereas Nils, a smaller guy whose wheels are good but not spectacular has been playing against men and is heavily relied on in all facets of the game. He's a complete player already -- but at what point does he hit his ceiling?
Meanwhile, Schneider barely played in the worlds just as Lundkvist was getting the most ice of any player on Team Sweden and getting points just as often as he did in the SHL.
Schneider or Robertson may turn out to be exactly what this team NEEDS. But Nils might be a difference maker period. That said, I don't know what Nils will be in the NHL -- but let's see first. The issue with him was always will his game and physical maturity ever match his hockey IQ. It seems like it has. And will only get better. He rarely makes the wrong play on the ice. Derek Stepan, based on his physical make up and speed should have never been a #1C in this league but his elite hockey IQ made the difference. Nils is a similar case. I am dead set against trading Nils until we see him in the NHL play meaningful minutes and we can see what we have.