NYR Viper
Registered User
Is Brassard even a better option than Strome at this point? He gets hurt, can't carve out a spot any where. Wasn't working as the #3 behind Crosby and Malkin. Not a #2 being MacKinnon.
Look, you sign Brassard and that leaves you with Strome, Howden, Andersen, and Chytil as guys battling for 2 center spots. Or you don't answer the center question on LA and Chytil for another year.
Brassard has been getting traded for less and less. He went to Colorado with a 6th for a 3rd. They were desperate for a second line center and went cheap instead of dipping into their assets. Florida may have been stuck if Colorado wasn't shopping.
That return isn't good enough to clutter the forward groups and muddy our future center depth. Its arguable that Strome is the better player. If we never had Brassard here before no one would want him now.
For me, the idea would be to insulate the center ice position a bit for 1 more year. Strome can play center, but having Brassard here pushes him to the wing and gives the Rangers 5 centers to begin the year. Zibanejad, Strome, Brassard, Nieves, Howden. With outside chances to Chytil and Andersson. Insulation and some redundancy at center is a good thing as injuries will happen.
I really don't see any of the Rangers current D as legit 1st pairing guys. Skjei's a top 4 and that's where DeAngelo's heading. Miller's a possibility in the future. Fox--I'm not sure about. The Rangers have a bunch of guys who should be good to very good top 4's and looking around the league there are good teams that get by alright without great 1st pairing guys. Boston for instance--McAvoy's got the talent but the offense and consistency isn't really there--the Islanders are another team--there is no one really outstanding on their D. Toronto's just got Rielly but he's not a guy I see ever winning a Norris Trophy.
It will be a big deal for the Rangers when all of Shattenkirk, Staal and Smith are gone--after that the space will be clear for all these coming guys to become what they're going to become. But anyway some of this is about how we define what a legit 1st pairing guys and there are different definitions than mine--but I'm looking at a guy who can play 25 minutes a game night in and night out at a high level in all situations--that includes penalty killing and last minute situations of needing a goal or protecting a lead and an ability to excel in these situations and if they can put up 50 points or more then you've got a real deal No. 1 D. Nobody on the Rangers currently is near that and Miller might turn into a first pairing guy but I don't think he'll turn into a legit No. 1. Our future situation is hardly bleak though--even if we don't have a real stud coming we've got a lot of numbers of defenders who could turn into quality players.
It would also be a good thing if at least two of Staal, Shattenkirk and Smith aren't Rangers this time next year.
For me, I would almost prefer to have 6 top-4 defensemen than 1 elite d-man and a couple of guys only capable of playing 12 minutes a game. Depth and balance.
I also disagree with the notion that the Rangers don't have a first pairing upside guy within the system. They ave guys like Miller, Lundqvist, Rykov, Hajek an Lindgren with outside shots for guys like Keane or Gross. If I had to put money on it, at least one of those guys will end up being a top-pair guy just based on percentages. That doesn't even account for a 24 year old Skjei getting his act together or DeAngelo getting better after his first real full season in the NHL. Or someone like Fox being acquired.
People look at the d-core within the system and seem to want that one flashy prospect but Gorton has done a very admirable job of finding guys who may have been undervalued in other systems for whatever reason and given himself quite a few shots at top-pair young guys.