Atax
Registered User
- Apr 7, 2011
- 6,211
- 7,860
But isn't it his right to return to Russia? Isn't that leverage? Just like it was Fox's right to stay in college. Why are we demonizing someone for a decision about their livelihood? What does it matter if some accepted going to the AHL and others didn't? It doesn't make someone better or worse. It's a business and their life/career. Let them do what they want.Apples and oranges.
Fox had contract leverage. He could stay in college until his rights expired and became a UFA. He basically told the team he wouldn't play for them and get the most value.
Kravtsov gave the team deuces twice after being sent down to Hartford. The second time was slightly different because Kravtsov had an establish "out" clause to go back to Russia. What stick in people's side was timing of circumstance when Lindgren and Chytil who were both camp standouts got sent down anyways, took their licks and came back better for it while Kravtsov "went home" If Fox did that, that's one thing. But those are two completely different circumstances.
I get what you guys are saying. I just don't want to trade someone because they want to control their lives.