DanielBrassard
It's all so tiresome
Pretty rough when you look at the cores of the other top teams in the league.
Pretty rough when you look at the cores of the other top teams in the league.
Are the two really intertwined? I didn't read Staple's article but it seems that he's upset with Panarin not necessarily the playstyle between he and Strome. Which could be an issue with Drury in it's own right.The Strome rumors do not line up with Drury's supposedly being upside with Panarin's play.
If the bit about Panarin is true, then I think the Strome rumors are pressure on Copp to take a more reasonable deal.
Sure. Depending what you give up for that one year... If it "empties the cupboards" and you don't win (the most likely scenario), you're screwed for years.Not being tied down to a center next summer when you’ve got to pay a lot of RFAs has value. Miller is a skilled & gritty guy who does everything the Rangers need at 2C. Even if it’s only for a year I think there’s merit to it
Rather trade that package for a signed Dubois. Miller is good but we have been there, done that.Kakko, Kravtsov & Lundqvist id be willing to discuss. Lafreniere, K'Andre, Chytil, Schneider are untouchables. If Vancouver wont make the deal they can trade him somewhere else.
I don't think it matters? The Rangers like Strome. The Rangers have always liked Strome. They want to keep Strome. They see him and Panarin as independent variables. They think Panarin had a bad playoffs, not the whole line (I imagine Strome having a busted pelvis for three months has helped his case).The Strome rumors do not line up with Drury's supposedly being upside with Panarin's play.
If the bit about Panarin is true, then I think the Strome rumors are pressure on Copp to take a more reasonable deal.
Strongly agree that I don't buy this either.Are the two really intertwined? I didn't read Staple's article but it seems that he's upset with Panarin not necessarily the playstyle between he and Strome. Which could be an issue with Drury in it's own right.
I read the article. Apparently drury was vocally displeased with panarin's play. Which isn't really a unique position.Are the two really intertwined? I didn't read Staple's article but it seems that he's upset with Panarin not necessarily the playstyle between he and Strome. Which could be an issue with Drury in it's own right.
Not being tied down to a center next summer when you’ve got to pay a lot of RFAs has value. Miller is a skilled & gritty guy who does everything the Rangers need at 2C. Even if it’s only for a year I think there’s merit to it
Liking strome and wanting to keep strome are two different concepts.I don't think it matters? The Rangers like Strome. The Rangers have always liked Strome. They want to keep Strome. They see him and Panarin as independent variables. They think Panarin had a bad playoffs, not the whole line (I imagine Strome having a busted pelvis for three months has helped his case).
As much as we all think this (me included) I doubt Gallant, his coaches, or NYR FO perceive Strome and Panarin's relationship is problematic or holding one or the other down.
Strongly agree that I don't buy this either.
Rather trade that package for a signed Dubois. Miller is good but we have been there, done that.
Considering Panarin is a top 10 NHL Talent and Kreider is not, it's not that surprising that he would be unhappy with the all-world talent looking like shit for most of the playoffs.By the way Panarin had the same amount of points as Kreider and by all accounts Panarin had some injury and was playing with broken Ryan Strome while Kreider and Mika were healthy
So what’s Drury’s excuse for being happy with Kreider but not being happy with Panarin?
If Miller costs any two of the names mentioned above and all we get is ONE playoff run out of him, HARD PASSKakko, Kravtsov & Lundqvist id be willing to discuss. Lafreniere, K'Andre, Chytil, Schneider are untouchables. If Vancouver wont make the deal they can trade him somewhere else.
Are the two really intertwined? I didn't read Staple's article but it seems that he's upset with Panarin not necessarily the playstyle between he and Strome. Which could be an issue with Drury in it's own right.
I don't think it matters? The Rangers like Strome. The Rangers have always liked Strome. They want to keep Strome. They see him and Panarin as independent variables. They think Panarin had a bad playoffs, not the whole line (I imagine Strome having a busted pelvis for three months has helped his case).
As much as we all think this (me included) I doubt Gallant, his coaches, or NYR FO perceive Strome and Panarin's relationship as problematic or holding one or the other down.
Strongly agree that I don't buy this either.
Kakko for one year of Miller? No. Kakko is still too young to give up on.Kakko, Kravtsov & Lundqvist id be willing to discuss. Lafreniere, K'Andre, Chytil, Schneider are untouchables. If Vancouver wont make the deal they can trade him somewhere else.
Chytil/Kakko/Lafreniere/Kravtsov/Miller/Lundkvist/Schneider/Jones/Robertson
I think some of you guys need to understand that at some point a couple of these guys will be moved and not all of them are staying if we want to actually win within this prime window. I get it, all these young players give us hope this Rangers team can be a competitive playoff team well into later this decade heading into the 2030's but I'm sorry that's just not realistic. Unfortunately the way this team has been built up the past couple years we've put ourselves into a bit of a corner to only really win the cup within these next 3 years. It's Shesterkin's contract length
Winnipeg is not looking to trade PLD. I heard the latest 32T podcast today. Not this summer. Maybe next summer. Winnipeg will try to convince PLD to sign an extension.PLD has quit on two teams now. Not interested in him or giving up those assets for a guy who is a quitter.
But i agree, miller is a rental. You dont empty the cupboard for that. And thats what the asking price is from Van.
“Decent #3 or great #4?” Think about that for a second.If we are discussing Skjei's NYR legacy, I think it's relatively balanced. Sure, he didn't progress as expected, but he was pretty much a net neutral on that contract we gave him. I think of him as pretty much a decent #3 or great #4.
Trading him was a fair deal for both parties.
The debate could be whether, had we not traded for Trouba and kept Skjei instead, how our defense would look. But we didn't know at that point just how good Fox was going to be and Trouba was dealt for with an eye towards giving us a true #1 all situations RD.
Colorado traded Kadri with three seasons remaining on his contract. They traded Barrie and Kerfoot for Kadri. No one is saying all of those players are playing for the Rangers. The Rangers will be rebuilding again if they start with the trading every 1st round pick and young player to win right away.Chytil/Kakko/Lafreniere/Kravtsov/Miller/Lundkvist/Schneider/Jones/Robertson
I think some of you guys need to understand that at some point a couple of these guys will be moved and not all of them are staying if we want to actually win within this prime window. I get it, all these young players give us hope this Rangers team can be a competitive playoff team well into later this decade heading into the 2030's but I'm sorry that's just not realistic. Unfortunately the way this team has been built up the past couple years we've put ourselves into a bit of a corner to only really win the cup within these next 3 years. It's Shesterkin's contract length
After that Panarin/Zibanejad/Kreider/Trouba are all 3 years older with that much more miles on them and Igor is most likely going to want above $10M and a massive raise. So yes, J.T. Miller is a risky move but you're getting a prime time monster Center that teams can rarely even acquire and someone who more than likely would put you over the hump next spring. I've said it before but look at Kadri in COL and what he's brought to that team. Having a 1-2 punch like that with a sand paper player that wins face-offs is what separates teams from being a true cup contender and just another playoff team.
Let Strome and Copp walk, use some of our asset capital to bring back J.T. Miller and figure out if you want to keep either Motte or Vatrano heading into next season. I think that would be all we really need to do to bolster the lineup enough and if VAN possibly retains even $1M-$2M then Drury can still make a smaller acquisition if he so chooses.
-Kakko takes a small bridge deal this summer (if he isn't traded)
-Chytil takes a short term deal for a small raise next summer (if he isn't traded)
-Lafreniere will take a bridge deal next summer unless he explodes out the gate for 60 points
-Kravtsov gets bare minimum and is still a top trade candidate (would probably be involved in the Miller deal)
-K'andre Miller is the one player that will truly be looking for a proper raise. I'm thinking he'd end up asking for $4M for 4 or 5 years easy next off-season
-Lundkvist is a prime trade chip
-Jones is a prime trade chip
-Robertson is a prime trade chip
-Schneider is being groomed as a Trouba replacement.......in about 3 or 4 years time, which simply isn't going to happen if this team wants to actually win in the slotted window they've given themselves but he's a guy Drury mostly doesn't want to move
which leaves Lafreniere, K'andreMiller, and Schneider as the only really "untouchable" young players within this system. Everyone else, expect Drury to be wheeling in hopes it puts us over that bridge these next 2 years
I dont care that panarin is a top 10 talent. I care that he's paid like a top 10 talent. Kreider had a great regular season but he's also being paid 6.5M and panarin is being paid almost twice that. He didnt produce twice the level of value in the playoffs.Considering Panarin is a top 10 NHL Talent and Kreider is not, it's not that surprising that he would be unhappy with the all-world talent looking like shit for most of the playoffs.
If Miller costs any two of the names mentioned above and all we get is ONE playoff run out of him, HARD PASS
Fair enough. Probably wishful thinking. I just truly don't understand how anyone working for this team could be disappointed with the way Panarin played this season, and not see Strome as an enabler / contributing factor.
The opposite was apparently true like a week ago, and I wouldn’t give it too much thought for another few weeks. Both camps are going to keep using each other as leverage until they can settle on a deal they want. Drury just needs to be smart with his contingency plans.Things I did not expect to see today: Ryan Strome looking likely to return. Please for the love of f*** let this not be true.
The yo yo affair with Drury continues.