Speculation: Roster Building Thread - Part XXXIII

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
There's room for a modestly priced 2C ($5 ish million), and Kane at 2.5 million for next season if the Rangers pay Chicago and another team (Arizona) to eat cap for 2022-23 if you also bridge Kakko and Miller.
You’re probably trading one of those two to get Patrick Kane. They’re not letting him go and retaining money for a package of scrubs
 
This year's cap space had nothing to do with why Buch was traded. We could have easily afforded that contract this year. Next year is when it would have been a problem.
I don’t really understand why fans concern themselves so much with the cap? The organization has people in place that deal with that single issue specifically. If they can make a move work they will, if they can’t, they won’t. The incessant bickering over cap implications is tedious at best, and in my opinion, the team should assemble the best team they can, year after year, and not deal in perpetual rebuilds with championships that may never come just because….a Youth.
 
I have a very specific cap nitpick; I think Kakko is in the absolute perfect spot to get an offer sheet from like...the Devils? Kraken? Pick a team with cap space who sucks, and it'll be hard for us to pay up and do everything else we want to do in the offseason.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bbny
I don't think the price will be that high for Kane. Could be wrong but we will see. The big question will be if the Rangers get double retention.
 
I don’t really understand why fans concern themselves so much with the cap? The organization has people in place that deal with that single issue specifically. If they can make a move work they will, if they can’t, they won’t. The incessant bickering over cap implications is tedious at best, and in my opinion, the team should assemble the best team they can, year after year, and not deal in perpetual rebuilds with championships that may never come just because….a Youth.
There's no magic involved with the cap. It's just math. Saying they'll figure it out later is just turning a blind eye to the issue.

Regardless, Drury traded Buch rather than pay him and then trade him a year later. That was management's answer to this issue. Saying they can now add Kane and figure it out later flies in the face of what they have already done.

Are you honestly going to tell me that you'd rather have Kane at 25 or 50% rather than Buch and the boatload of assets it will take to get Kane at that price? What exactly are you prepared to give up for Kane? Because it's going to take a lot.
 
The Rangers trading Buchnevich for salary reasons and getting bent over in the trade and then turning around and paying a premium for another winger in Patrick Kane would be laughable

As much as I like Buch, Kane is a HOF and one of the best playoff performers of his generation. Buch has 1 point in 8 playoff games

With said, I'm supremely against the move unless we can get him for cheap. But given that he's still putting up absurd #'s why the hell would Chicago give him away for cheap
 
I have a very specific cap nitpick; I think Kakko is in the absolute perfect spot to get an offer sheet from like...the Devils? Kraken? Pick a team with cap space who sucks, and it'll be hard for us to pay up and do everything else we want to do in the offseason.
The risk any team takes in offersheeting kakko (especially one like the kraken or the devils) is that what you're giving up are completely unprotected picks. Ignoring the cap implications, if the devils got kakko via an offersheet, then the rangers would at minimum get their 2023 first. The risk is too big, especially for kakko who hasnt broken out yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KOVALEV022473
The risk any team takes in offersheeting kakko (especially one like the kraken or the devils) is that what you're giving up are completely unprotected picks. Ignoring the cap implications, if the devils got kakko via an offersheet, then the rangers would at minimum get their 2023 first. The risk is too big, especially for kakko who hasnt broken out yet.
You can give him 4.1M and only give up a second round pick, that's not a huge cap hit but it's way ahead of his production
 
Kane does seem like a Sather/NYR move but the good news is Pagnotta doesn't know anything.

Even actually NYR connected writers like Brooks, Staple, Mercogliano clearly all got bcc'd on the same email last week ahead of all putting out the exact same article 3 times.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad