Leetch3
Registered User
- Jul 14, 2009
- 13,002
- 10,863
If he’ll take 5 years he’ll be a Ranger IMO.
If he wants more than that, he’ll be moved.
Just so everyone is aware, if Kreider signs a 7 year contract he’ll be 36 at the end of it - saying this because I see so many people say “he’s only 27”.
its not bad logic and he's still signed for next year so it would be 6 more years. but i think thats gonna be a pretty hard sell for him to not want the 7 years he can get on the open market. he's never going to recover that $$ in those last 2 years cause he won't get nearly as much if he signs a deal after this one...but maybe if you give him more $$ per year it would work
that said though my first question when it comes to extending kreider or signing panarin or whatever is what are we planning to do to fix the blueline. I keep reading about the logjam on the blueline but its all unproven talent that in many cases is several years away. do they look to make a deal for immediate help (ie trouba) or is the plan going to be patience, wait for the kids and let the bad contracts expire?
in the long run the second option might be the smart play but might mean 2, 3, 4 years until the blueline is completely transformed and fixed...so then i ask is it a smart investment to keep kreider or bring in panarin if we are gonna 'waste' the next 3 years waiting for the blueline to be fixed? and i'm sure this will get reactions of 'oh i guess we are supposed to suck forever' but those long term deals typically include not so good years toward the end of the year so if you aren't competing in the good years of the deal does it make sense?