Strome at 5-5.5M seems reasonable. I think as long as there's not a very restrictive movement clause it will be fine.
The NHL is tracking to bring in more than $5 billion in revenue this year, and that revenues are up from pre-pandemic levels. The league's expansion to Seattle as well as broadcasting rights deals with Disney and Turner Sports have helped fuel the recovery from the revenue hit the league took during its pandemic-shortened seasons.
The NHL salary cap will increase to $82.5 million for the 2022-23 season, as the league remains under a "flat cap." Bettman said he believes it will take "three more seasons, including this one" before the NHL is fully repaid under escrow and will have the salary cap rise with linkage to revenue.
I just find it hilarious that anybody thinks Strome is going to take a new contract that starts with a 5. He can easily go elsewhere and get closer to $7m per. Now, I also believe that Strome realizes a few things.....
1) He is a key piece in NY, mainly due to the fact that he and Artemi Panarin work very well together. I also believe he is is smart enough to know that if he leaves for a big money deal, it will likely weigh him and his new team down, as he wont have Panarin there helping his point totals. It becomes a bad contract for his new team and he wont live up to expectations ( even though i do believe that he is a better player today than he was a few years back ).
2) I think in the end he is smart enough to realize that the NYR's are a perfect fit for him and his career. He takes a discount to stay ( which he has said he wants to do ) and play on an up and coming team, as well as continuing to play along side one of the leagues best talents. I think it takes something in the low $6M range for a 5-6 year contract......that way everybody wins.
Are we watching the same player? He may not be putting up points regularly but I'd say he has been very effective on the boards and creating havoc in the offensive zone.
I seriously doubt he gets more than 6 mil on the open market and I think if he signs with the Rangers it's going to be in the 5.25-5.5M range. I just don't think his value around the league is as high as you think. I certainly think they tried to see what they could get for him these last 2 off seasons and well, he's still here. Other GM's know that a good deal of his production is because of Panarin and that plays into his value. I like Strome and would be ok with him being signed to a reasonable deal but I can see both sides of the argument to signing him or letting him walk.
Technically, ON one, yes.Are you in a wheelchair?
22" width-wise, not rims... f*** Shesty... my technique involves simply going out... opponents won't shoot ata guy in a wheelchair, that's just horrible... worked in 'NamDude does that thing have rims from an Escalade?! So many customization options on one of these sites. You must have had some insane mods installed in that bad boy to compete with Shesty's lateral movement. Unless you also have a personal hover vehicle which would be f***ing sick.
I mean NYR is probably pointing to the RNH deal and praying on the hometown discount to stay. He certainly could get more on open market, which doesn’t mean it’s a good deal for the Rangers, but it’s not going to be a bad deal either.I just find it hilarious that anybody thinks Strome is going to take a new contract that starts with a 5. He can easily go elsewhere and get closer to $7m per. Now, I also believe that Strome realizes a few things.....
1) He is a key piece in NY, mainly due to the fact that he and Artemi Panarin work very well together. I also believe he is is smart enough to know that if he leaves for a big money deal, it will likely weigh him and his new team down, as he wont have Panarin there helping his point totals. It becomes a bad contract for his new team and he wont live up to expectations ( even though i do believe that he is a better player today than he was a few years back ).
2) I think in the end he is smart enough to realize that the NYR's are a perfect fit for him and his career. He takes a discount to stay ( which he has said he wants to do ) and play on an up and coming team, as well as continuing to play along side one of the leagues best talents. I think it takes something in the low $6M range for a 5-6 year contract......that way everybody wins.
If the Rangers signed Strome to a 6 year contract at a cap hit between $5-5.5MM that is not a bad contract. In 3 years once escrow us paid off that cap is going to jump big time. That's also just a $500k-1MM raise and it would take him to age 35.
So, two offseasons before the cap will be going up, this offseason and the next. Of course, the Rangers have some bigger deals potentially before then.
I think this group could ideally stay together with Kakko, Miller, Laf, and Chytil taking 1-2 year deals on their next contracts. Once the cap goes up, which it will by a lot, we can pay these guys and still keep what we already have.
If he isn't willing to take a contract in the 5's then he's probably not going to stick aroundI just find it hilarious that anybody thinks Strome is going to take a new contract that starts with a 5. He can easily go elsewhere and get closer to $7m per. Now, I also believe that Strome realizes a few things.....
1) He is a key piece in NY, mainly due to the fact that he and Artemi Panarin work very well together. I also believe he is is smart enough to know that if he leaves for a big money deal, it will likely weigh him and his new team down, as he wont have Panarin there helping his point totals. It becomes a bad contract for his new team and he wont live up to expectations ( even though i do believe that he is a better player today than he was a few years back ).
2) I think in the end he is smart enough to realize that the NYR's are a perfect fit for him and his career. He takes a discount to stay ( which he has said he wants to do ) and play on an up and coming team, as well as continuing to play along side one of the leagues best talents. I think it takes something in the low $6M range for a 5-6 year contract......that way everybody wins.
That's not going to happen, and none of their future pieces have shown that they should be locked up long term. The Rangers are in a different position than NJ with Hughes or whatever comparables you might think of, whether you believe they should be or not. They aren't going to jettison their most integral pieces at the moment when they have a chance to win.If the Rangers were smart they would jettison what salary they could spare now, that isn’t or shouldn’t be long term important (cough, cough, Strome, Kreider, or Trouba, cough) and lock up their future pieces under the old structure long term before the cap increases.
This sounded a whole lot better during the off-season. I am still willing to explore this when it comes to Strome but there is no chance that they look to move either Kreider or Trouba, both of whom look to be in the midst of career years and are major contributors to one of the best teams in the league. It’s just not happening.If the Rangers were smart they would jettison what salary they could spare now, that isn’t or shouldn’t be long term important (cough, cough, Strome, Kreider, or Trouba, cough) and lock up their future pieces under the old structure long term before the cap increases.
If the Rangers were smart they would jettison what salary they could spare now, that isn’t or shouldn’t be long term important (cough, cough, Strome, Kreider, or Trouba, cough) and lock up their future pieces under the old structure long term before the cap increases.
Plus a Stanley cup ring12 seasons and 720 NHL games. Not a bad career if this turns out to be it for him.
Plus a Stanley cup ring
FWIW, he has 6 points in 10 GP this season.
Would love to see another team in the Toronto market ...they said in the past it was feasible but the move in the area money for Leafs would be HUGE !!!I think Houston and Quebec City should get teams. Move the Coyotes and the Devils.
That's not going to happen, and none of their future pieces have shown that they should be locked up long term. The Rangers are in a different position than NJ with Hughes or whatever comparables you might think of, whether you believe they should be or not. They aren't going to jettison their most integral pieces at the moment when they have a chance to win.
This sounded a whole lot better during the off-season. I am still willing to explore this when it comes to Strome but there is no chance that they look to move either Kreider or Trouba, both of whom look to be in the midst of career years and are major contributors to one of the best teams in the league. It’s just not happening.
Or, instead of losing 2 or 3 of our best players, we could pinch pennies now on players who have yet to prove they deserve big contracts, and then have more than enough cap space to pay their next contracts, should they deserve a significant bump.
This sounded a whole lot better during the off-season. I am still willing to explore this when it comes to Strome but there is no chance that they look to move either Kreider or Trouba, both of whom look to be in the midst of career years and are major contributors to one of the best teams in the league. It’s just not happening.
Right now? Of course they are. How could you say otherwise. It's not Lafreniere, Chytil, Kakko, Miller, Lundkvist who are the difference makers at the moment.The pieces I named are not their most integral pieces.