- Sep 20, 2007
- 8,413
- 13,441
Any talk of Eichel in this thread is an instant lifetime ban for @Tob from here on out.
Dont say I didnt warn you.
Mods, please pin this.
Dont say I didnt warn you.
Mods, please pin this.
Any talk about Eichel needs to stop now. And I'm not just talking about the Zib contract.
We are oozing skill in our lineup. And we have more than enough guys right now that thrive with the puck on their stick and having possession -- Kakko, Zib, Panarin, Laf, Krav, Fox.
What we likely will need is consistent cap room to ensure strong bottom six forwards who can play throughout lineup when nec but also play really well away from the puck.
Eventually, a true bottom six center who can shut down opponents and win big faceoffs may need to be acquired. Maybe Barron becomes that? I don't know. I think Chytil's game is closer to a top 6 C than a shut down guy.
If we had a dominant bottom 6 center like that and continue to find solid complimentary players the sky is the limit.
But -- I am starting to believe the key to the season is going to be our D zone play. If our D corp comes together and can play solid late in games we can make a run. But I'm skeptical. We'll see.
19m next summer to lock in Fox, Kakko, and Kravtsov. Strome has to be a goner at this point, right?
Yea. Don’t see how or why drury would spend close to 7 mill per on him.19m next summer to lock in Fox, Kakko, and Kravtsov. Strome has to be a goner at this point, right?
It could still be possible. Though a lot harder now.I wouldn’t be opposed to still trying to find a way to get Eichel too; but more realistically and probably a better management of team/assets I’d really, REALLY like to find a way to get Lundell.
Florida locked up Barkov, come on, excess D for Lundell, let’s do it.
I wouldn’t be opposed to still trying to find a way to get Eichel too; but more realistically and probably a better management of team/assets I’d really, REALLY like to find a way to get Lundell.
Florida locked up Barkov, come on, excess D for Lundell, let’s do it.
I dont think its completely dead as an option for the Rangers.While Eichel is highly unlikely at this point, I will say that he also cannot be completely ruled out. I think there is a decent likelihood the Rangers keep lurking and see how the market goes (which is smart and what they should be doing).
If, and once again this is highly unlikely, the Sabres don’t love what’s out there and like the Rangers system they could come back and offer to retain salary to get a deal done. I don’t see that happening, but it’s not completely out of the realm of possibility either.
Yea. Don’t see how or why drury would spend close to 7 mill per on him.
Not on a multi-year deal anyway, there are better options at that price and cheaper too. Hopefully chytil can be it
I still think Fox takes a discount. around 8x819m next summer to lock in Fox, Kakko, and Kravtsov. Strome has to be a goner at this point, right?
I believe the Rangers are keenly focused on a path forward that sees Chytil take the second line spot, Barron the third line spot and potentially someone like Richards the fourth line spot.
If Barron starts in the AHL it is only because they want to give him a ton of time (see Jones).
What’s particularly exciting about the Rangers is that they haven’t sacrificed depth yet and have a multitude of options for the future.
You have Kreider on the first line, but who could eventually find himself on the third and potentially moved with someone else sliding in a bit further down the line. You’ve got guys who could slide up and down the lineup, and you have a ton of potential support options at various levels in the system right now.
Some are more transition pieces types in the AHL, but then there’s this plethora of support talent ranging from Berard, Vierling and Tarnstrom, to Othmann, Korczak, Grubbe, etc.
On defense you have Jones, Schneider and Robertson set to get a lot of ice time in Hartford. You even have someone like Reunanen, who at least has a shot to be a transitional/depth guy in the NHL, potentially playing on the third pair.
I still think Fox takes a discount. around 8x8
I don't know if Kakko would take a long term contract but it'd be nice to get him to a 5-6 year deal.
I fully expect Kravtsov to get a 2 year deal similar to Chytils.
I initially thought Strome was all but gone.... but I love the person and he's been a solid player for us. If he takes a massive discount.... maybe. Some team will give him big $$$ as a UFA.
We have a borderline 'complete' team. Barring injury, there shouldn't be any need to giving up futures for 'missing pieces' at the TDL. Keeping our futures is crucial in having a healthy cycle of talent when cap crunches occur.Strome remains a possibility to be a self-rental. I know that’s not the answer most fans want to here.
However, my personal dream scenario is that Chytil and Barron force the issue so much that they just grab the second and third line spots and the Rangers move Strome for a first a B prospect.
I want our present young talent to make it impossible to keep them in lesser roles and allow the Rangers to continue to stockpile assets that they can use down the line to address any need.
We have crazy depth as it is. But if our young talent forces the issue, I have no qualms about having two firsts and two second in the 2022 draft.
More talent, more guys to cycle in down the line if others bust or get too expensive. Mix it up with high ceilings and high floors. Take chances on guys who might not be ready for 4 years. Make it so that future moves can quickly be masked by insane depth. Just keep going forward.
If Edge could right the script, that would be a key scene.
We have a borderline 'complete' team. Barring injury, there shouldn't be any need to giving up futures for 'missing pieces' at the TDL. Keeping our futures is crucial in having a healthy cycle of talent when cap crunches occur.
Buch -> Kravtsov
Strome -> Chytil or Barron
Trouba -> Schneider
Kreider -> Cuylle or Othmann
etc..
we have replacements ready to go because we aren't mortgaging our future. Keep accumulating picks/futures for those 'veteran talents' as well. We're really in a phenomenal spot.
Strome remains a possibility to be a self-rental. I know that’s not the answer most fans want to here.
However, my personal dream scenario is that Chytil and Barron force the issue so much that they just grab the second and third line spots and the Rangers move Strome for a first a B prospect.
I want our present young talent to make it impossible to keep them in lesser roles and allow the Rangers to continue to stockpile assets that they can use down the line to address any need.
We have crazy depth as it is. But if our young talent forces the issue, I have no qualms about having two firsts and two second in the 2022 draft.
More talent, more guys to cycle in down the line if others bust or get too expensive. Mix it up with high ceilings and high floors. Take chances on guys who might not be ready for 4 years. Make it so that future moves can quickly be masked by insane depth. Just keep going forward.
If Edge could right the script, that would be a key scene.
We have a borderline 'complete' team. Barring injury, there shouldn't be any need to giving up futures for 'missing pieces' at the TDL. Keeping our futures is crucial in having a healthy cycle of talent when cap crunches occur.
Buch -> Kravtsov
Strome -> Chytil or Barron
Trouba -> Schneider
Kreider -> Cuylle or Othmann
etc..
we have replacements ready to go because we aren't mortgaging our future. Keep accumulating picks/futures for those 'veteran talents' as well. We're really in a phenomenal spot.