Levitate
Registered User
- Jul 29, 2004
- 31,713
- 9,336
He hasn't even finished a full season yet...
Maybe he should start improving then
He hasn't even finished a full season yet...
A team who would probably LOVE to have McQuaid is Pittsburgh. They're going to have to face Washington in the playoffs. They just traded Oleksiak away (probably with an eye towards gaining some cap space moving forward). Would they and the Rangers make a deal? Zuccarello has proven chemistry with Brassard. Zuccarello + McQuaid to Pittsburgh?
Brassard is imminently gone from Pittsburgh. Matter of time.A team who would probably LOVE to have McQuaid is Pittsburgh. They're going to have to face Washington in the playoffs. They just traded Oleksiak away (probably with an eye towards gaining some cap space moving forward). Would they and the Rangers make a deal? Zuccarello has proven chemistry with Brassard. Zuccarello + McQuaid to Pittsburgh?
I think you may be close to something here. If the Penguins can find a buyer for Brassard, perhaps it becomes a Hayes and McQuaid package. Hayes would be much better to round out the Penguins up the middle than Brassard. Brassard could bring back ammunition (e.g. a first or a real good prospect) that might be included in a Hayes/McQuaid deal. The Rangers could help out by retaining salary.A team who would probably LOVE to have McQuaid is Pittsburgh. They're going to have to face Washington in the playoffs. They just traded Oleksiak away (probably with an eye towards gaining some cap space moving forward). Would they and the Rangers make a deal? Zuccarello has proven chemistry with Brassard. Zuccarello + McQuaid to Pittsburgh?
Why not just cut out the middleman and theoretically trade Hayes to that team?I think you may be close to something here. If the Penguins can find a buyer for Brassard, perhaps it becomes a Hayes and McQuaid package. Hayes would be much better to round out the Penguins up the middle than Brassard. Brassard could bring back ammunition (e.g. a first or a real good prospect) that might be included in a Hayes/McQuaid deal. The Rangers could help out by retaining salary.
This is a ridiculous take.However, scratching him (or anyone) while continuing to send Howden out there to die, and continuing to send McLeod out there to make everyone else die, is representative of problematic philosophies within the organization, that being, you can literally be bad if you try hard.
It's not a "take."This is a ridiculous take.
It's not a "take."
This team has been icing bad players since I can walk.
They go out of their way to do so. (like going 11/7 tonight, for example)
The past is irrelevant. Dave Karpa and Shane Churla don't play here anymore.It's not a "take."
This team has been icing bad players since I can walk.
They go out of their way to do so. (like going 11/7 tonight, for example)
They've proven it over and over again.The past is irrelevant. Dave Karpa and Shane Churla don't play here anymore.
11/7 seems fine if you're Quinn and want to send a message to both Pavel Buchnevich (bad) and Brendan Smith (good) individually.
But your take that organizationally they're happy if you're bad is like... cmon.
Sounds like the kind of guy a benching might motivate (???).On Buch-
The issue is that he doesn't forecheck, backcheck, cause turnovers, create chances, hit or move his feet.
For him to be an offensive star, he needs the kind of dick swagger that comes with that, and he just doesn't have that type of dick swagger. So he needs to do all of the other things to be a complete player because the only players who get away without playing a complete game are the ones that produce elite offense.
I really don't understand the preoccupation with the 12th forward on a bad roster. It's just weird. Not just you either, this happened with Glass and before that Stu Bickel and Mike Rupp.They've proven it over and over again.
Karpa and Churla don't play here anymore, but McLeod does.
Sounds like the kind of guy a benching might motivate (???).
It's not there.I really don't understand the preoccupation with the 12th forward on a bad roster. It's just weird. Not just you either, this happened with Glass and before that Stu Bickel and Mike Rupp.
At some point I think you have to assume these guys add something, and just because you don't see it doesn't mean it's not there.
Advanced metrics for dick swagger?On Buch-
The issue is that he doesn't forecheck, backcheck, cause turnovers, create chances, hit or move his feet.
For him to be an offensive star, he needs the kind of dick swagger that comes with that, and he just doesn't have that type of dick swagger. So he needs to do all of the other things to be a complete player because the only players who get away without playing a complete game are the ones that produce elite offense.
Probably not. Soft 2nd line wingers are not in short supply.Honestly I don't think so. If Jussi Jokinen didn't play a complete game, would you want him on your team?
If that's a no, then that's what you have with Pavel at the moment.
Advanced metrics for dick swagger?
D:Are the same people who say, 'We have no talent, play the talent.' the same ones that want to trade all of our talent?