Speculation: Roster Building Thread: Part XXIV

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Are the same people who say, 'We have no talent, play the talent.' the same ones that want to trade all of our talent?
So we can lose and draft high to get better talent? Yes.

Again, there's a difference between employing bad players because you're in a rebuild and simply valuing bad players. Everything about the Rangers indicates the latter.
 
Probably not. Soft 2nd line wingers are not in short supply.

But Buch is here now so you try. IMO.

Oh yeah. I'm not giving up on the kid, but given the entitlement and low effort players that's on the roster right now, all Buch needs to do is move his feet, and get physically involved.

If he does that, the rest will come. Of he's going to veer away, then he can look forward to a great KHL career.

Guys not without options, what he does with it, is up to him.
 
So we can lose and draft high to get better talent? Yes.

Again, there's a difference between employing bad players because you're in a rebuild and simply valuing bad players. Everything about the Rangers indicates the latter.
So, you want to eventually ice a bad roster but are mad because you feel, currently, the roster is filled with bad players?

Am I understanding correctly?

edit - you continue to miss the point. We are 'retoooling' or 'rebuilding'. You have to play a certain way to play. ALL players, even the 'stars/elite', need to compete and meet certain criteria.

Yes, the NYR value bad players. You got it
 
Last edited:
So, you want to eventually ice a bad roster but are mad because you feel, currently, the roster is filled with bad players?

f8535df32b.png
 
Jack Eichel: "He's a friend to me, a mentor and he's been pretty close to me even through my first few years in the NHL. He was so good to me at BU and we have such a good relationship."

Clayton Keller: "Coach Quinn was the reason why I came to BU and it was a great place for me."

Brady Tkachuk: Quinn was "really important" to him, was "one of the big reasons" why he went to BU and that he will "miss" playing for him.
RangerBot friend: 01100010 01100101 00100000 01100011 01100001 01110010 01100101 01100110 01110101 01101100 00100000 01101111 01100110 00100000 01010001 01110101 01101001 01101110 01101110
 
Jack Eichel: "He's a friend to me, a mentor and he's been pretty close to me even through my first few years in the NHL. He was so good to me at BU and we have such a good relationship."

Clayton Keller: "Coach Quinn was the reason why I came to BU and it was a great place for me."

Brady Tkachuk: Quinn was "really important" to him, was "one of the big reasons" why he went to BU and that he will "miss" playing for him.

Sure, but those guys were good enough to get scholarships.
 
RangerBot friend: 01100010 01100101 00100000 01100011 01100001 01110010 01100101 01100110 01110101 01101100 00100000 01101111 01100110 00100000 01010001 01110101 01101001 01101110 01101110

This is a family site - can't use this language around here. Report.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bob Richards
Rebuilding teams ice bad players because they’ve traded away their good players.

I’m pretty sure if the Rangers could acquire young players and draft picks without trading away their good older players they would.

Playing bad players just for the f*** of it seems like a questionable strategy.
 
The Rangers have 3 scouts st the Winnipeg and Boston game tonight. Last night they had a scout at the Winnipeg and Philly game as well as Chris Drury was there last night. It would appear the Rangers are scouting Winnipeg HEAVILY
 
  • Like
Reactions: DutchShamrock
The Rangers have 3 scouts st the Winnipeg and Boston game tonight. Last night they had a scout at the Winnipeg and Philly game as well as Chris Drury was there last night. It would appear the Rangers are scouting Winnipeg HEAVILY
Both potential Hayes destinations. I like that Mikos proposal far better than Appleton and a 2nd.
 
On Buch-

The issue is that he doesn't forecheck, backcheck, cause turnovers, create chances, hit or move his feet.

For him to be an offensive star, he needs the kind of dick swagger that comes with that, and he just doesn't have that type of dick swagger. So he needs to do all of the other things to be a complete player because the only players who get away without playing a complete game are the ones that produce elite offense.

Pretty much this. He’s also seemingly allergic to getting within 5 feet of the boards.

The people who are trying to paint him in the light of a “good player” have some serious issues.
 
I wonder if Winnipeg would be interested in Zuccarello. They have size in spades throughout their lineup. Maurice knows Zucc from his time in the KHL. Perhaps the Rangers are scouring someone like Brendan Lemieux?
 
The past is irrelevant. Dave Karpa and Shane Churla don't play here anymore.

11/7 seems fine if you're Quinn and want to send a message to both Pavel Buchnevich (bad) and Brendan Smith (good) individually.

But your take that organizationally they're happy if you're bad is like... cmon.

This is the poster that destroyed AV at every turn. Now it’s an organizational problem, whatever that means. Perhaps he should look in the mirror and realize his inability to gauge the talent level of a roster is the real problem
 
It’s funny that people want this, yet don’t take into account where he’s been placed in the lineup.
I'm not talking about just points.

Skating and working hard is irrelevant to what line he's on. I'm under the impression he was producing because he was skating hard and working
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad