Speculation: Roster Building Thread: Part XXIII
- Thread starter Krams
- Start date
- Status
howztheglass
Registered User
- Jan 27, 2009
- 2,454
- 645
I’d want more.
I’ll throw this out there—if and a big if Colorado wants to make a huge trade and become a serious competitor what about:
Hayes—second line center their looking for
CK—second line wing
Shattenkirk—Dman and PP QB they might be looking for at 50%
For
Makar
Kaut
Jost
1st in 2019. Not Ottawa’s
Soderberg
Colorado has 11.5 million in cap space which will be no issue with taking back Soderberg.
Taking 50% on Shattenkirk allows the extra in the deal.
We all believe CK or Hayes should return and first along with a prospect or other close to the same so break it down.
CK for Makar and Jost
Hayes for 1st and Kaut
Shattenkirk for well Soderberg and including to be as proposed.
I don’t believe this would happen but just think how this deal would add to the rebuild.
Oscar Lindberg
Registered User
Obviously would be interested in Liljegren
He probably won’t be as good as I thought he may during his draft year but he’ll turn into a 2-3rd pairing guy
Also there is some overating of our players here haha. I love Kreider but Makar won’t be moved for him. Makar is probably the best D prospect in the world, and if he’s not the best, he’s at worst top 3
He probably won’t be as good as I thought he may during his draft year but he’ll turn into a 2-3rd pairing guy
Also there is some overating of our players here haha. I love Kreider but Makar won’t be moved for him. Makar is probably the best D prospect in the world, and if he’s not the best, he’s at worst top 3
Ghost of jas
Unsatisfied
Yeah, and don’t get my previous post wrong, he is a good prospect, but we got Pionk and TDA and Lundkvist already. And I don’t really see much upside beyond becoming like a Vatanen type. 3 years ago that was a wet dream, but I just think we have bigger needs.
Ghost of jas
Unsatisfied
People continue to confuse what the likely Ranger approach to trading Kreider (and most likely Zibanejad) is. It’s not about getting a fair deal. It’s about getting an overwhelming offer. If someone wants Kreider, they’re going to have to overpay. I don’t care if people think the deal is fair for the other team. Gorton doesn’t have to trade Kreider. There’s no point in bundling him with Hayes.
Last edited:
Oscar Lindberg
Registered User
Timmons would be a way more attractive piece if his brain wasn’t scrambled
Rangers shouldn’t gamble on him with Hayes unfortunately
howztheglass
Registered User
- Jan 27, 2009
- 2,454
- 645
howztheglass
Registered User
- Jan 27, 2009
- 2,454
- 645
Where there’s smoke there’s fire.
Colorado really is one of the better fits for Hayes.
howztheglass
Registered User
- Jan 27, 2009
- 2,454
- 645
howztheglass
Registered User
- Jan 27, 2009
- 2,454
- 645
Couldn’t agree more.
To bad for the kid but unfortunately one more hit and it could end his career. This oh course is if he even overcome his last concussion.
You don't typically get recent 1st round picks or lottery selections back at the deadline. Folks hoping for Kaut in return for Hayes are probably going to be disappointed. Makar is rightfully untouchable. That Ottawa 1st goes nowhere until the Avalanche know where it's going to be.
kinger8998
Registered User
im happy to pay kreider on his next contract. the guy is dominant. dont understand why everyone here feels the burning desire to trade a guy were going to have a very very hard time replacing. such a unique talent
kinger8998
Registered User
guys you move this deadline:
fast, namestnikov, hayes, zucc, mcquaid, claesson, vesey
guys you wait to move:
shattenkirk
guys you should ride out their contracts:
staal, smith (use at 7thD)
guys you dont move: zbad, kreider, chytil, ADA
guys i dont know what to do with:
skjei, pionk
special cases:
buchnevich, i dont want to give up on him, but if you get the right offer, not sure what that is, i take the deal. not an untouchable for me
fast, namestnikov, hayes, zucc, mcquaid, claesson, vesey
guys you wait to move:
shattenkirk
guys you should ride out their contracts:
staal, smith (use at 7thD)
guys you dont move: zbad, kreider, chytil, ADA
guys i dont know what to do with:
skjei, pionk
special cases:
buchnevich, i dont want to give up on him, but if you get the right offer, not sure what that is, i take the deal. not an untouchable for me
n8
WAAAAAAA!!!
I would only trade Kreider away if we are getting ourselves a bonafide top line talent like Tyler Seguin. Can't see the Avs trading Makar under any circumstances.
I see us developing skjei and pionk further but if we can use them as trade chips to upgrade a package, i'm all for it. Ex. Namestnikov + Skjei for Tomas Hertl + prospect/whatever. random proposal but we'd be using Skeji to upgrade Names into Hertl and whatever else (don't focus on if it's not balanced. not the point i'm making)
I see us developing skjei and pionk further but if we can use them as trade chips to upgrade a package, i'm all for it. Ex. Namestnikov + Skjei for Tomas Hertl + prospect/whatever. random proposal but we'd be using Skeji to upgrade Names into Hertl and whatever else (don't focus on if it's not balanced. not the point i'm making)
Last edited:
howztheglass
Registered User
- Jan 27, 2009
- 2,454
- 645
I want to keep him but if the Rangers are blown away I could see them trading him.
n8
WAAAAAAA!!!
The whole Lindholm/Hanafin - Hamilton/Ferland was the closest thing we've seen to something like this but that pretty much all one-for-ones.
Only team that might look at buchnevich is Carolina. They’re still looking for goal scoring. He could be an add to boost a return.
RangerBlues
Registered User
Amazing Kreiderman
Registered User
- Apr 11, 2011
- 45,075
- 40,935
I love kale. Very healthy too
- Status
