Speculation: Roster Building Thread: Part XXIII
- Thread starter Krams
- Start date
- Status
I would love to add Fiala if the deal was reasonable.
As far as trading CK to COL, 1st+ Kraut or Jost is honestly not enough. I am in no way blown away by that package.
That’s extremely poor assets management imo. Why trade CK for $0.75 on the on dollar?
NYR Viper
Registered User
Kevin Hayes is the ideal piece for Colorado to add for the next 5-6 years. That top line is going to continually tear the league apart. They need someone who can take tough matchups and provide some offense. Add Hayes and find a good 2-way winter to play with him and their top-6 will be built well. A guy like Silfverberg comes to mind as a UFA this year.
Hayes to Colorado. It would seem that if Sakic and Gorton knew there was an interest there, they could discuss with Kevin whether he would be interested and if so, what would interest him. They have cap space and the need for a player like him. Duchene is the other UFA center this year and there’s NO WAY he returns. Soderberg hasn’t worked out.
Jost + Bowers + COL 1st ‘19 + Conditional COL 1st ‘20 (if he re-signs) for Hayes + Vesey
Hayes to Colorado. It would seem that if Sakic and Gorton knew there was an interest there, they could discuss with Kevin whether he would be interested and if so, what would interest him. They have cap space and the need for a player like him. Duchene is the other UFA center this year and there’s NO WAY he returns. Soderberg hasn’t worked out.
Jost + Bowers + COL 1st ‘19 + Conditional COL 1st ‘20 (if he re-signs) for Hayes + Vesey
UAGoalieGuy
Registered User
Hayes and Shattenkirk (with some money retained) for Barrie, Bowers Avs #1 and a conditional 2nd in 2020 if either Hayes resigns or Avs gets to the conference finals this season.
Barrie to the Leafs for their #1 and Grundstrom.
Barrie to the Leafs for their #1 and Grundstrom.
- Jul 20, 2005
- 4,926
- 2,340
Have there been Barrie trade rumors this season?
There were tons of them last year but I assumed he was off the table now.
UAGoalieGuy
Registered User
NYR Viper
Registered User
Serious question
Would anyone be upset if the Rangers traded Shattenkirk at this deadline while retaining half his cap hit? Obviously it would depend on the return but would anyone be vehemently against the idea?
Would anyone be upset if the Rangers traded Shattenkirk at this deadline while retaining half his cap hit? Obviously it would depend on the return but would anyone be vehemently against the idea?
UAGoalieGuy
Registered User
I would not be upset. I dont think Shattenkirk would be against it either, especially if it's to a competing team.
Tawnos
A guy with a bass
His take there is BS anyway. For one thing, Fiala is essentially getting the same ice-time he did last year. ~13 minutes even strength, 2nd PP unit, no PK time. Hardly sounds like a coach who "has no use for him this year." For another, Fiala is pacing to have basically the same season he did last year because after he had those 42 points in 62 games cited in that article, he had 6 in his next 18 to finishing the year with 48. He's pacing 45 this year. The first stat cited in the article praises Fiala for his 1.64 P1/60. This year? 1.64 P1/60.
There are ways in which he isn't doing as well, but I'd say that's true of the entire Preds team this year. They're still really good, but last year's regular season was basically unconscious. In no way is Fiala having an awful year. Some variation, but he's 22. Don't think the Preds have any interest in moving him.
I want to give the minutes to Pionk and ADA, so yeah. If we're retaining 50% for the remainder of the contract, I'd hope for some decent futures.
LiveLongandProspal
NY Rangers = America's Team
I Eat Crow
Fear The Mullet
- Jul 9, 2007
- 19,984
- 13,652
It’s not that long of a contract and I don’t think we will need tremendous amounts of cap space (unless we want to go get EK and Panarin maybe? Not sure as haven’t checked cap friendly or anything like that) so I actually like the idea in theory.
Would have to be a justified return though. Shatty at half price for a few playoff runs can be a very valuable asset if GMs believe he can sustain he better play (he has been better recently).
Matt Rentfree
Registered User
I don’t know much about Makar aside from his lofty draft status. Has he been the “real deal” in his D+ seasons?
If so, I can see us being interested in that package.
Amazing Kreiderman
Registered User
- Apr 11, 2011
- 45,075
- 40,935
That's a no for the Rangers. Prospects are always overrated on these boards.
Amazing Kreiderman
Registered User
- Apr 11, 2011
- 45,075
- 40,935
Love Liljegren. Was projected top-3 for a while but dropped in his draft year due to mono
At the end of this rebuild we are not going to lack guys like Bowers though...
DanielBrassard
It's all so tiresome
I've lost a bit of interest in Liljegren. He is more and more trending in an direction to become a pure PP specialist. He could have value as such, sure, but there are so many younger PMDs coming up. Liljegren isn't showing much speed coming out of his own end and so forth, he isn't adopting that dynamic modern skating game offensively.
I actually like TDA more than Liljegren.
Not a huge fan of Bowers or Jost, would prefer a more offensively talented prospect even if it means less quantity.
Amazing Kreiderman
Registered User
- Apr 11, 2011
- 45,075
- 40,935
Lion Hound
Pornhub Enthusiast
I think retaining half is too much. He makes what $6mil? Still have Giriardi's hit next season. That over $6mil in cap space for two players then wouldn't even be here
LORDE
I am Lorde, YA YA YA
Or you can pay 6.5 for the next two years.
I don't think it matters financially or play wise.
If we can get an asset for him I think we do it. Don't care about our cap right now, don't care about our play right now.
Care about building for the future and that is ALL
- Status
