rangers1314
Registered User
Carp writing today that the Rangers are "not likely" to be loaning Lias to a SHL team right now. Says they aren't interested in doing him any favors at the moment.
What would you consider in terms of a contract if you were to re-sign Strome? Assuming he is somewhere in between .5ppg and ppg. It's a difficult question for sure
If the Rangers were in the middle (a couple of years into) of the contention window, I would be probably a lot more keen on keeping Kreider even if it meant overpaying for a 50-point player at $6.5m AAS or more, and a big risk that the last couple of years the Ranger would be lucky to get $3.5m production out of him. But the Rangers are not even in that window yet, probably not for another couple of years, and Kreider is not a cornerstone (like Panarin) to build the team around. He's pure physical force and these type of players tend to diminish with age ultra fast.
He's not flashy by any means but that's not a detriment. He's a high IQ/cerebral player. He's been making some beautiful reads/passes, the puck always finds him and hopefully, he starts ripping it. I dont know why we're completely ignoring last season... He was trending up as a Ranger. Obviously, playing with a world talent will elevate his production... compared to Fast and Names... I mean lets be somewhat objective here.It's because Zib passes the eye test with flying colors and Strome's eye test is really, really pedestrian. We all know he's running inferno hot.
Thank you for thisPanarin has been in on 21 of Strome's 37 points (56.76%). 7 of Strome's 26 assists have come on Panarin goals (26.92%) and 7 of Strome's 11 goals have been assisted by Panarin (63.63%). 7 times they've combined for the assists on a goal, with 4 times Strome being the primary assist and 3 times Panarin being the primary assist.
Scoring logs on Hockey-reference.com. You can do lots more, I'm just not good at it. I literally just counted manually, LOL.Thank you for this
Where was the information pulled from? I'd like to look up some things
Bless your soulScoring logs on Hockey-reference.com. You can do lots more, I'm just not good at it. I literally just counted manually, LOL.
That's the verdict? It's not a yes or no question.On one hand, Kreider is in the best shape of his life after the illness a few seasons back. It's not unlikely he could play at a sustained level into his mid 30's like MSL and Roberts.
On the other, all he has is his wheels and strength. He's not highly skilled at puck and positional management. If his wheels slow down during his next contract, whoa be the bearer.
Verdict: Agreed. Rangers are not in a position to gamble on that kind of contract. Not with a cap and repercussions for buy-outs.
How much time has Buchnevich spent with Zib and how much does he have to show for it?
Yet we disparage Strome because he has taken advantage of a fortuitous situation in way other players clearly cannot
I agree they shouldn't break the bank and make Strome a $7m a year player, but considering he will most likely be playing with Panarin moving forward and considering they seem to both be benefiting from each other, if you can get him signed to a reasonable deal, perhaps the Rangers have found their version of what Kunitz was to Crosby in Strome to Panarin. If guys work well together I understand the need to negotiate but his age range, expected contract and versatility seem to point towards keeping him around. Again, if the contract is reasonable.
That's the verdict? It's not a yes or no question.
There's a couple of IFs here.
IF he will take a 4-5 year deal.
IF he will take a hometown discount
If the the answer is yes to those, he should be signed. I highly doubt anyone here wants to sign him to a 7 year deal.
That's the verdict? It's not a yes or no question.
There's a couple of IFs here.
IF he will take a 4-5 year deal.
IF he will take a hometown discount
If the the answer is yes to those, he should be signed. I highly doubt anyone here wants to sign him to a 7 year deal.
Crosby has brought up Kunitz, Dupuis, Sheary, Guentzel, Rust (they played together a little), Neal, Horqnvist, Armstrong, Malone. Paying/extending Kunitz because he did well with Crosby would have been a mistake considering how many completely random guys could fill that role.
Much like messier and Callahan, amongst others.Letting jagr leave when we did to go to the K was the dumbest thing ever. Could have played 3 or 4 more years easily with us and continue to score. Wasted years of his career. But even saying that jagr was falling he had 123 pts then 90 something then 70 or so with us his last year and far older.
Kreider is 28 and imo getting better. I think contract is weighing on him but since he’s back with Mika he’s flying
It's no shocker....he's followed the same pattern Zucc laid last season....barely a whimper in the early part of the season....now that the trade deadline looms he suddenly finds his game.....he's a goner.Yes, he has stepped it up even further this year. Is it a shocker? Someone playing better when developing chemistry with a super star. But a) not everyone can develop chemistry with such a player and b) again, are we going to simply dismiss that he is on pace for 55 assists for the year? Should there be a discount rate applied to assists because Panarin happens to be the one scoring them? I do not recall Buchnevich having such good chemistry with him.
For a bit of clarity, those assist totals would put him into the company of Draisaitl & Kessel. This year, he is currently one assist behind Marner. Does anyone discount who scores Marner's goals? Did anyone question who it was that was scoring for Adam Oates?
I love Panarin, but I'm not about to call him CrosbyCrosby has brought up Kunitz, Dupuis, Sheary, Guentzel, Rust (they played together a little), Neal, Horqnvist, Armstrong, Malone. Paying/extending Kunitz because he did well with Crosby would have been a mistake considering how many completely random guys could fill that role.
Currently Mika and Buch have played 153:19 at 5V5 this seasonHow much time has Buchnevich spent with Zib and how much does he have to show for it?
Yet we disparage Strome because he has taken advantage of a fortuitous situation in way other players clearly cannot
Except the Pens did exactly that. Twice.
Zucc took what was probably a hometown discount the first time around. Coming off a 59 point season he locked into that 4Y/$18M deal. Even though he only scored 49 points that year I feel like he most definitely could have nabbed at least a few million more. Otherwise, yeah, not a lot of guys taking hometown deals. Obviously Shatty but that was somewhat of a different situation.The chance of him taking a hometown discount is so slim that it isn't worth taking into meaningful consideration.
Hayes, Zucc, Cally, etc. all loved playing in NY, yet they refused to take a hometown discount. The way hometown discounts are talked about on these boards, one would think almost every impending FA takes less money and term to remain with their team, but that's not often the case.
Except the Pens did exactly that. Twice.
I should have phrased it better. The 4-5 year is more important than the discount. He could take a discount but I'd still reject a 7 year deal.In the words of the immortal John McAfee.
"I'll eat my own d*** if..." Kreider resigns at a low year, hometown discount.
It would have happened by now. He wouldn't risk injury in his final year AND take less than market value at the same time. Nor would the Rangers have been quiet and held out this long either. It's not like there is tampering to worry about so someone would have spilled the beans in the unlikely event everyone is playing coy because Chris Kreider is bleeds blue that hard.