GoAwayGiannone
Registered User
Only way they're trading Trouba right now is if it's for McDavid. Which they're not. So ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
any interest? Pending UFA making 700k. Might be good on a line with Chytil.
Lukas Radil Hockey Stats and Profile at hockeydb.com
Trouba can’t be on the table. You don’t trade high end players immediately after a long term deal is signed. It crushes your ability to sign high end free agents going forward. 3 years from now? Sure. For now there is no way he’s in play.
Trouba also with a rebuilding club that has some defensive woes and plenty of new faces and green behind the ear guys....it will take some time for things to mesh . I think that is why he has been inconsistent in some games....same goes for Skjei....time is on our side ....let's not panic just yet on these guys . I think we all see the good flashes they have shown us .
Its not even 3 months in and we're already talking about trading Trouba?
Sometimes this place truly is an insane asylum
dirty move you know I won’t argue #72
there are people looking to move trouba cause fox and deangelo have been so good offensively...but what about the whole defenseman playing defense part? if trouba is gone who matches against the other teams top line? who kills penalties? Fox has played 1:20 on the PK and Deangelo has played 1:56 on the PK, thats total for the season. combined 0:07 per game. Trouba has averaged 2:51 per game on the pk
if you want to argue that those 2 deserve PP time over trouba that's one thing but they are so far away from making him expendable or redundant. completely different type of dmen...one day those 2 might be able to handle the defensive side, and I have complete confidence that one day Fox will. but we are no where near that point...
much in the same fashion that we would be foolish to move georgiev before igor has played in the NHL...you don't move a known young asset for the dreams of what might be
There would be a lineIt's nonsense. Trouba is not going anywhere. For better or worse, get used to him being here for the long haul. At 8 mil a year, no other club would be interested.
He was over paid and forced a long term deal just like every other top free agent. That is not attractive.There would be a line
Correct me if I’m wrong, but I didn’t say he would, I said he might.Why would he be good with Chytil?
The Czech Republic is a country not a wine club.
We have 3 D in the top 40 in scoring, they are our 3 RD.
How about we keep them?
There would be a long lineHe was over paid and forced a long term deal just like every other top free agent. That is not attractive.
Trouba has brain farts at times, but his size, physicality and shot can't be replaced on this roster. It's also very possible that he hasn't reached his ceiling yet. Look at how much Carlson has improved compared to what he was at 25.
There would be a long line
I'm surprised no one has proposed signing Kovalchuk now that his contract with LA has been terminated.
A Rangers blogger today suggested we trade him because he is "below average"
I don't think Trouba will ever be close to those D-men you mentioned. At best he is a 50 point scorer. Plus he is a bit of a defensive liability. He's not very good getting in front of shots, using his stick to deflect them. I have seen many times this season, forwards shooting right through him, using him as a screen and scoring. He is very good on the boards winning battles, clearing pucks, and other such things, but is not an overall great D-man like those you mentioned.There was (is?) a reported named Sherry Ross who annually published a book with scouting reports on all players in the NHL. Basically a page per player. It wasn’t bad. Very mainstream.
But the description of Nik Lidstrom sticks out. He is said to be a great No 3 but someone who isn’t special enough to be able to become a top pairing D. And it certainly is a totally fair assumption. He played behind Coffey in Detroit. He was just this really good second pairing D at the age of 25. Like 10 years later he has 7 Norris Trophies.
Scott Neidermayer was also far from being seen as elite when he was 25. He got what 2 of the Norris Ts Lidstrom didn’t get.
From my POV it comes down to this, and a big part of this team’s ability to contend comes down to this, and that is that we must get a top line that can go head to head with the other top lines in the East. And, I don’t think Zibanejad is a good fit at center on a line like that. I love Ziba, so impressed by him in many ways and he seems like a great guy. But the top lines, especially Boston’s line, Tampa’s when they are playing well, Sid and so forth they do a darn darn good job out there.
I think Panarin is a great start to match them, but he needs a center more towards Bergeron, someone really smart that can weigh things up, and that doesn’t travel as much N-S like Ziba does without the ability to make up for it with super good agility.
If we can get that, I think Trouba could excel on defense behind a top line like that.
Al Arbour's philosophy was to shoot the puck from ANYWHERE and EVERYWHERE on the ice.
This was his mantra long before they went on to dominate the NHL.
A shot attempt makes the goalie move to get in position as they HAVE to assume its gonna get through meaning there is potential to take them out of position if its deflected away from the net.
The Rangers often times overpass.
We need selfish players that want to shoot and not pass
I think the idea is that if push comes to shove there is a contingency here who think that DeAngelo is worth keeping around more than Trouba.