Speculation: Roster Building Thread: Part XVIII

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
  • We're expeting server maintenance on March 3rd starting at midnight, there may be downtime during the work.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Trouba can’t be on the table. You don’t trade high end players immediately after a long term deal is signed. It crushes your ability to sign high end free agents going forward. 3 years from now? Sure. For now there is no way he’s in play.

Not that I think they should trade him, but the Rangers have proven over and over that this kind of thinking doesn't reflect reality. They've made some pretty harsh business decisions with players they signed as UFAs, and yet UFAs keep wanting to come here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Greg02
Trouba also with a rebuilding club that has some defensive woes and plenty of new faces and green behind the ear guys....it will take some time for things to mesh . I think that is why he has been inconsistent in some games....same goes for Skjei....time is on our side ....let's not panic just yet on these guys . I think we all see the good flashes they have shown us .
 
Trouba also with a rebuilding club that has some defensive woes and plenty of new faces and green behind the ear guys....it will take some time for things to mesh . I think that is why he has been inconsistent in some games....same goes for Skjei....time is on our side ....let's not panic just yet on these guys . I think we all see the good flashes they have shown us .

I am in agreement with you here. While I tend to be slightly pessimistic when it comes to this team, I see the Trouba trade/signing as one that should be instrumental when all is said and done. Obviously the rebuild needs to progress and things have to go right, but if everything comes together the way we’re all hoping, I think Trouba will be a very important piece back there. I’m sure it’s been said dozens of times on this forum. I just don’t see why trading him would be considered.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NYRangers16 and Ola
there are people looking to move trouba cause fox and deangelo have been so good offensively...but what about the whole defenseman playing defense part? if trouba is gone who matches against the other teams top line? who kills penalties? Fox has played 1:20 on the PK and Deangelo has played 1:56 on the PK, thats total for the season. combined 0:07 per game. Trouba has averaged 2:51 per game on the pk

if you want to argue that those 2 deserve PP time over trouba that's one thing but they are so far away from making him expendable or redundant. completely different type of dmen...one day those 2 might be able to handle the defensive side, and I have complete confidence that one day Fox will. but we are no where near that point...

much in the same fashion that we would be foolish to move georgiev before igor has played in the NHL...you don't move a known young asset for the dreams of what might be
 
there are people looking to move trouba cause fox and deangelo have been so good offensively...but what about the whole defenseman playing defense part? if trouba is gone who matches against the other teams top line? who kills penalties? Fox has played 1:20 on the PK and Deangelo has played 1:56 on the PK, thats total for the season. combined 0:07 per game. Trouba has averaged 2:51 per game on the pk

if you want to argue that those 2 deserve PP time over trouba that's one thing but they are so far away from making him expendable or redundant. completely different type of dmen...one day those 2 might be able to handle the defensive side, and I have complete confidence that one day Fox will. but we are no where near that point...

much in the same fashion that we would be foolish to move georgiev before igor has played in the NHL...you don't move a known young asset for the dreams of what might be

It's nonsense. Trouba is not going anywhere. For better or worse, get used to him being here for the long haul. At 8 mil a year, no other club would be interested.
 
Trouba has brain farts at times, but his size, physicality and shot can't be replaced on this roster. It's also very possible that he hasn't reached his ceiling yet. Look at how much Carlson has improved compared to what he was at 25.

There was (is?) a reported named Sherry Ross who annually published a book with scouting reports on all players in the NHL. Basically a page per player. It wasn’t bad. Very mainstream.

But the description of Nik Lidstrom sticks out. He is said to be a great No 3 but someone who isn’t special enough to be able to become a top pairing D. And it certainly is a totally fair assumption. He played behind Coffey in Detroit. He was just this really good second pairing D at the age of 25. Like 10 years later he has 7 Norris Trophies.

Scott Neidermayer was also far from being seen as elite when he was 25. He got what 2 of the Norris Ts Lidstrom didn’t get.

From my POV it comes down to this, and a big part of this team’s ability to contend comes down to this, and that is that we must get a top line that can go head to head with the other top lines in the East. And, I don’t think Zibanejad is a good fit at center on a line like that. I love Ziba, so impressed by him in many ways and he seems like a great guy. But the top lines, especially Boston’s line, Tampa’s when they are playing well, Sid and so forth they do a darn darn good job out there.

I think Panarin is a great start to match them, but he needs a center more towards Bergeron, someone really smart that can weigh things up, and that doesn’t travel as much N-S like Ziba does without the ability to make up for it with super good agility.

If we can get that, I think Trouba could excel on defense behind a top line like that.
 
There was (is?) a reported named Sherry Ross who annually published a book with scouting reports on all players in the NHL. Basically a page per player. It wasn’t bad. Very mainstream.

But the description of Nik Lidstrom sticks out. He is said to be a great No 3 but someone who isn’t special enough to be able to become a top pairing D. And it certainly is a totally fair assumption. He played behind Coffey in Detroit. He was just this really good second pairing D at the age of 25. Like 10 years later he has 7 Norris Trophies.

Scott Neidermayer was also far from being seen as elite when he was 25. He got what 2 of the Norris Ts Lidstrom didn’t get.

From my POV it comes down to this, and a big part of this team’s ability to contend comes down to this, and that is that we must get a top line that can go head to head with the other top lines in the East. And, I don’t think Zibanejad is a good fit at center on a line like that. I love Ziba, so impressed by him in many ways and he seems like a great guy. But the top lines, especially Boston’s line, Tampa’s when they are playing well, Sid and so forth they do a darn darn good job out there.

I think Panarin is a great start to match them, but he needs a center more towards Bergeron, someone really smart that can weigh things up, and that doesn’t travel as much N-S like Ziba does without the ability to make up for it with super good agility.

If we can get that, I think Trouba could excel on defense behind a top line like that.
I don't think Trouba will ever be close to those D-men you mentioned. At best he is a 50 point scorer. Plus he is a bit of a defensive liability. He's not very good getting in front of shots, using his stick to deflect them. I have seen many times this season, forwards shooting right through him, using him as a screen and scoring. He is very good on the boards winning battles, clearing pucks, and other such things, but is not an overall great D-man like those you mentioned.

One of the reasons we are scoring goals this year is due to our blueline getting involved. It has always taken a unit of 5 to play well together. So whether the top lines improve the blueline or visa versa, they both complement each other offensively, and defensively too. And being we have both in spades, (2 top lines and a foward blueline) we are lighting up the board more often than not.

We have two top lines that most teams don't. Strome and Panarin carried us when Zibad was out for a month. And they show no signs of slowing down. Zibad is probably now,.. getting his wind and legs back after being out a month. And he has always played well with Kreids and Buch. But if you were to ask me to choose, Strome's line would be number one. Don't under rate either lines impacts, just because they don't have marquee names.
 
Last edited:
Al Arbour's philosophy was to shoot the puck from ANYWHERE and EVERYWHERE on the ice.

This was his mantra long before they went on to dominate the NHL.

A shot attempt makes the goalie move to get in position as they HAVE to assume its gonna get through meaning there is potential to take them out of position if its deflected away from the net.

The Rangers often times overpass.

We need selfish players that want to shoot and not pass

Sometimes the Rangers start going East to west too much, but at the same time they’re tied at 8th in terms of goals per game so I’m not really looking to drastically change the philosophy. I would certainly love to add 2-3 tough North American guys who go north and south. Before anyone jumps at me, they don’t have to be North American, but they usually play that style much more often.
 
Trouba is 25. Must be time to take him in the back yard like Old Yeller. No way he can get any better.

It’s not like they should be trying to get him a better partner or anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheDirtyH
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad