RGY
Kreid or Die
also, Nieves demoted
Very surprised Georgiev is playing back to back. Especially after the workload he received last night. Guy has to be at least a little sore / tired.
Don’t agree.
Edit: did not realize Hank has been ill
also, Nieves demoted
I'm good with 4 or 5 years at that but do you think that will get it done if he has 50 points? I'd love to see them try him on the off side and see if he can replace someone in our top 4.
There were reports last night that Hank was "under the weather."Very surprised Georgiev is playing back to back. Especially after the workload he received last night. Guy has to be at least a little sore / tired.
Don’t agree.
Apparently Lundqvist was sick last night and an emergency backup was on call. Considering earlier in the week Quinn said that Hank was playing tonight I have to think Georgiev is only playing tonight because of Lundqvist being sick.Very surprised Georgiev is playing back to back. Especially after the workload he received last night. Guy has to be at least a little sore / tired.
Don’t agree.
Also have to figure Quinn wants to reward strong performances, plus Hank was ill. Maybe Shesty could’ve got a look. I’m assuming Quinn asked Georgiev if he felt up to it.Very surprised Georgiev is playing back to back. Especially after the workload he received last night. Guy has to be at least a little sore / tired.
Don’t agree.
Definitely think Shesty at home wouldve been a good option. Let Hank stay home and rest before they fly to Vegas. Hartford is starting the first of a back to back in Springfield, MA tonight. Could’ve been done.Also have to figure Quinn wants to reward strong performances, plus Hank was ill. Maybe Shesty could’ve got a look.
I wouldn’t know. I don’t mess with other fan bases on their boards.Yea, we never do that...
Signing UFAs is the cost of doing business in this league. Every team has older players with problematic contracts. You're either signing your own soon-to-be UFA or some other teams. Guys in their late 20s come up for new deals every damn year. That's life.
I didn’t bring up Panarin. Pawnee Rangers got mad about not liking my post about Kreider so he decided throw Panarin in my face as a way of saying I was wrong about Panarin so I am wrong about Kreider too. No victory laps in the first year of a seven year contract. Let us see how it plays out. The other guy said don’t worry Panarin because he will be a productive player for almost the entire term of the contract because he has few NA miles on him. We heard the same nonsense about Zuccarello on this board and how the Rangers should re-sign him long term in the summer of 2018 before he becomes a free agent. Same exact argument with the lack of NA miles on his resume.
Let us see how Panarin performs throughout the term of the contract and just how successful the Rangers are in the next 5-7 years.
Pawnee Rangers got mad about Kreider. That started the whole thing. You’re a Kreider fan boy too. The Rangers need to move on from him.
Anthony DeAngelo, for all of his warts, is an offensive difference-maker at the NHL level. He's more effective, consistently, at driving offense than most of the forwards on this team.
Kreider and Strome should be dealt a this deadline. There will be at least (1) NHL player coming back in those deals. Hopefully by then, Lias will be up full time as well.
DeAngelo should be re-signed long-term at $4.5-$5m per season.
I didn’t bring up Panarin. Pawnee Rangers got mad about not liking my post about Kreider so he decided throw Panarin in my face as a way of saying I was wrong about Panarin so I am wrong about Kreider too. No victory laps in the first year of a seven year contract. Let us see how it plays out. The other guy said don’t worry Panarin because he will be a productive player for almost the entire term of the contract because he has few NA miles on him. We heard the same nonsense about Zuccarello on this board and how the Rangers should re-sign him long term in the summer of 2018 before he becomes a free agent. Same exact argument with the lack of NA miles on his resume.
Let us see how Panarin performs throughout the term of the contract and just how successful the Rangers are in the next 5-7 years.
Pawnee Rangers got mad about Kreider. That started the whole thing. You’re a Kreider fan boy too. The Rangers need to move on from him.
I think the point is are they contending for the Cup within that time frame? If they are AND Panarin is close to the player he is today, then the signing will have proved to be a good one. If they are not, and he deteriorates and is eating up a lot of cap space, then it will not look as good.Most likely Rangers will not win a Stanley Cup the next seven years, with or without Panarin. But we should not underestimate Panarins role in developing the young players. It is likely much more fun for them to play on a team with Panarin than another young player. So yes, the first year of his contract could easily be as important as his third or fourth. To help along the rebuild.
If he gets those numbers, I think it is very likely that he prices himself in and it is another name that prices themselves out.problem is, he may price himself off the team if he ends up with 60 points.
so, this is interesting. i happen to agree with your take but im concerned.
with trouba already making bank and playing a ton and now fox being so good so fast, im just not sure ADA has the top 4 spot and the minutes to warrant that type of commitment long term.
if fox weren't here, or trouba or if tony were a lefty, not question i re-up the kid at 5 per for 6 yrs.
problem is, he may price himself off the team if he ends up with 60 points.
this one will be a difficult decision.
so, this is interesting. i happen to agree with your take but im concerned.
with trouba already making bank and playing a ton and now fox being so good so fast, im just not sure ADA has the top 4 spot and the minutes to warrant that type of commitment long term.
if fox weren't here, or trouba or if tony were a lefty, not question i re-up the kid at 5 per for 6 yrs.
problem is, he may price himself off the team if he ends up with 60 points.
this one will be a difficult decision.
They should sneak Igor into the building and yell SURPRISE when they take the ice for warmupsGoing in with an emergency backup and a guy who just faced 50 shots?
If he gets those numbers, I think it is very likely that he prices himself in and it is another name that prices themselves out.
like who ?
i am not down on trouba at all. big fan. minutes eater, 200 ft dman who plays an overall sound game.
fox is a future allstar who plays like a veteran. kids legit.
ADA is a gifted offensive play driving puck possessing 5th forward who can run a PP1 and get you 60.
we have 3 great young dmen who compliment each other pretty well.
that left side tho. thats the problem.
staal. skjei. lindy. hajek. we need an UPGRADE here.
He's a mediocre at best defender on the right side. I want no part of putting him on his off side.I'm good with 4 or 5 years at that but do you think that will get it done if he has 50 points? I'd love to see them try him on the off side and see if he can replace someone in our top 4.
Like a forward possibly. Maybe none of Kreider, Strome or Buchnevich come back. This is just spitballing. A lot depends on progress made by prospects and frankly what DeAngelo does for the rest of the year.like who ?
Staal's time on the team is not meant for long term. Lindgren I believe is going to be quite capable of holding down a spot on the 2nd pair. Hajek is developing and if he does not improve, then his time on the team might move on from him. You have other prospects in the pipeline. Skeji has value. The situation is not as dire. Plus there will be other options available in the market and via trade.that left side tho. thats the problem.
staal. skjei. lindy. hajek. we need an UPGRADE here.
I don't think anyone would disagree with you, but I don't think they need to force a deal. Sign him long-term and see what occurs. There isn't a rush to make any sort of deal as Fox is still on his ELC. So are Lindgren and Hajek.