I think it's far more absurd to assume Dolan was completely willing to do whatever the hockey people wanted even if what they wanted was a long, patient, ground up rebuild. You think Dolan wasn't putting pressure on NYR management to not fully bottom out, even since the original "letter"? I think thats pretty naive.
1/26/2018 just before "the letter"
There is no ambivalence within management. The Blueshirts, we’re told on good authority, view the Feb. 26 trade deadline as a unique opportunity to refresh the roster and replenish the organization…
nypost.com
The Rangers plan, because of course it was, was always to try to "contend while rebuilding". You don't think Dolan is influencing that? HF interpreting the letter as "Wow! The Rangers are actuall going to rebuild!" was us hearing what we wanted to hear.
Further evidence of this was obviously JD & Gorton's firings. From an article titled "
Jim Dolan’s Rangers vision clashed with John Davidson-Jeff Gorton blueprint" (pretty direct...)
The Letter is in the past. The past is in the rearview mirror with Davidson and Gorton. This is all about the future. Development has left Penn Station.
nypost.com
Now certainly, the specifics of "accelerating the rebuild" like keeping Kreider, signing Panarin and dealing for Trouba were on JD and Gorton. I just think it's wild to suggest that Dolan had no influence on the overall approach to team building, when every piece of evidence we had (as well as common sense that the owner of the team would set guardrails and objectives for the org) would indicate he did.