...it was a joke since Buffalo traded a 3rd for his rights before he signed with us. Would've been funny to me if they traded a 3rd for him twice.Hey I’ve got $50. Can I trade you for $100?
Oh. Good one....it was a joke since Buffalo traded a 3rd for his rights before he signed with us. Would've been funny to me if they traded a 3rd for him twice.
Package Vesey with what ever to get 31?
How far can 20 and 31 move us?
According to Friedman, Buffalo has asked about Jimmy Vesey. Please, please, please. Let this be true!
Trading Vesey to a team he refused to sign with 3 years ago would be hilarious
Vesey for 31 fair?
Vesey for 31 fair?
I have been on Cap Friendly for days, and the more and more I fiddle, the more I realize adding Panarin will likely cause some headaches sooner than later. That, and all the Rangers "center" prospects, save for Brett Howden, have skillsets that can easily work on the wings. Assuming Kreider's contract situation goes reasonably well and the organization doesn't overpay too much, I honestly think they're much better off going after Duchene if they go big fish hunting in FA.
With Zibanejad and Duchene, the organization would have Kreider, Lias, Chytil, Kravtsov in the fold. Add Kakko (presumably) with the No. 2 overall pick and Buchnevich on a fair "bridge" style 3/4 RFA contract (likely $4-4.5 million) + one of Namestnikov/Vesey (I have a feeling at least one is moved), and that is plenty to work with. Duchene had 10 points in 10 playoff games with Columbus under Torts. I think before last season there were a lot of reasonable questions surrounding him, but he answered the call last season. I would much rather Duchene in that $9 million range than Panarin for $1-2 million higher.
The obvious issue is Zib/Duchene are definitely more 1B types, but together they would instantly become one of the best 1-2 C combinations in the East. Rangers would automatically lap several teams, and would just need some tweaks on D to get back to a playoff level. Up front forward wise they'd easily be talented enough.
What are we adding to Vesey for the 31oa?Vesey for the 31OA would do it for me.
I want to know how Vesey is returning the 31st overall pick.
What are we adding to Vesey for the 31oa?
Vesey's value is going to be tempered by the fact he is one year from UFA. Maybe a third now and a third if he is resigned next year.Vesey is a 26 year old 35-point player, will probably score more next season, is defensively responsible and hits.
Price should be a 2nd, or a 3rd and a prospect, or a 3rd and a 4th.
I am way more valuable.Vesey for 31 fair?
I’m sure Buffalo is confident they can re-sign him.......Vesey's value is going to be tempered by the fact he is one year from UFA. Maybe a third now and a third if he is resigned next year.
1) Why is getting rid of Shattenkirk predicated on Smith? It’s not but we probably will be able only to shed one
2) You believe that Vesey would do better playing 8 minutes a night than Smith on the 4th line? Yes
3) You still have nnot given a reason as to what the issue is with Smith being the 12th forward/7th defenseman role on a nightly basis. He isn’t good at hockey