We are just so early on in this process.
We are already projecting out our future based on a number of players who haven’t even played 1 second of NHL hockey - Kakko, Kravtsov, Miller, Lundkvist, Rykov, Shesterkin, etc.
Our more advanced prospects are 19-21, many with less than 100 pro games. We’re not talking about adding Trouba to a group of guys who are 23, 24, have a season or two of steadily increasing success under them.
And Trouba very well could be the next MCD. But I don’t see the next McD necessarily putting this group, at this time on his back. And that’s both what we’d be asking (and paying) Trouba to do.
Is it better than what we have now? Yeah, it is.
Does it strike me as a good combination? Very uneasy about that.