We have Vets, so I completely disagree that we need Panarin for his leadership.
If 1 player won't be the difference maker between being a bubble team/bottom feeder, then you don't sign him? You pay that kind of contract to someone who is a difference maker.
Chytil has had a season and a 1/2 here. Howden won't see big minutes. K+K might very well start in Hartford. Fox can be sheltered since we have options on Defense.
Zbad, Kreider, Buch, Fast, Strome, Names. Even if you remove Kreider from that group we're not a team composed of pubescent teenagers. Staal, Shatty, Smith, Skjei. Lunqvist.
This team has vets.
You're completely misrepresenting my argument. Whether you are deliberately doing so to fit your own (also known as a strawman), or you just lack the simple reading comprehension skills to understand me, these are not the points I made. No where did i mention the word LEADERSHIP in my entire post, in fact I
explicity said
talented veterans. Having an elite player that can both help carry the load and be someone our young players can look up to and learn from is not always quantifiable, but very important to the growth of a young player. At least we agree that we aren't signing Panarin "just for his leadership."
No where did I say that Panarin was not a difference maker. I very clearly explained that even though we are signing a player as talented as Panarin, it likely wouldn't be enough to offset the loss of Hayes, Zucc, Kreider. In fact I would argue that even if we signed Panarin, that the team would finish just as bad or even worse than in the 18-19 season. We will start with even less veteran depth than the year before, the roster will be younger and thus more green, and our biggest problem, the defensive core, will be a year older and worse as it's shortcomings won't be improved until the dead weight is gone. Good thing that Panarin would be around a bit longer than next season and still be able to be a big contributor when the team starts making waves. No where is there a hard fast rule that a rebuilding team is unable to sign a talented free-agent, the binary thinking that some people continue to tout around here that either gorton signs no one of significance which continues the rebuild or he signs 1 player and thus it is declared "
NYR FANS THE REBUILD IS OVER!!" Signing Panarin is a
TALENTED VETERAN player that the team can use a cornerstone for the rebuild and bring about some stability.
Speaking of stability, you note that the Rangers are "stacked with veterans". Four of the six forwards I bolded in your post have an expiring contract, and seeing that Gorton will continue to rebuild he is likely to trade many of these expiring contracts seeing how thats the M.O. of a rebuild (yes, strome still has 1 year of RFA control but his QO will be expensive for what he brings). Staal, Smith, Shattenkirk, Lundqvist will all be gone the season after that. Sure would be nice to have a good vet to be around a bit longer than that.