Greg02
Registered User
- Jun 28, 2009
- 4,546
- 4,067
I can’t wait to see some posters on this board implode when it comes out Rangers are in hard on Panarin
That's where the disconnect is.To me, there are two questions that matter with Panarin:
How much of a difference do you think he makes with our first round draft pick? Are we talking going from 2 to 7, or from 6 to 9?
Where will we be in year three of the hypothetical Panarin contract?
You get a different perspective when you are shelling out $10k every year for season tickets.The “don’t sign panarin” crowd seems to mostly be hoping for at least 2 more top 5 picks. I just don’t see that happening even if they don’t sign panarin this summer.
Won't implode, but will have serious questions about the other 3-4 moves needed to make signing Panarin worthwhile.I can’t wait to see some posters on this board implode when it comes out Rangers are in hard on Panarin
Or when your job is on the line and/or revenue is declining YOYYou get a different perspective when you are shelling out $10k every year for season tickets.
If our window opens in year three AND Panarin is still competing in years 3-5, then the signing is a success. I can't hang my hat on those odds.That's where the disconnect is.
I think we are on the uptrend and will be contending in 2 years. Carolina-esque. An ECF appearance is not to be expected but not something out of the realm of possibilities.. ( depending on player development )
IMO Year 2-7 of his hypothetical contract we will be competingIf our window opens in year three AND Panarin is still competing in years 3-5, then the signing is a success. I can't hang my hat on those odds.
You get a different perspective when you are shelling out $10k every year for season tickets.
I would hope guys like Chytil, Andersson, and Howden can improve enough where we don't have to look at after the TD performance as a guideline, not to mention adding in the 2nd overall pick to the lineup. If we are similar to what we were after the TD that's not great news for the development of the guys already with the team.
You get a different perspective when you are shelling out $10k every year for season tickets.
Care to make a sock bet? Loser eats their sock on camera. I'm already locked in to do it if the Rangers make the playoffs next season. Would you like to do the same if they don't?I know many of you hope they’re a bottom 5 team for the rest of your lives but that’s not happening lol, I’d bet a large sum of money they are nowhere near the bottom 5 this season. And if they get Panarin I would be surprised if they don’t make the playoffs
Care to make a sock bet? Loser eats their sock on camera. I'm already locked in to do it if the Rangers make the playoffs next season. Would you like to do the same if they don't?
Should give us a shot at assessing whether Shesty can split duties with Hank down the line.
There are way too many variables. The team hit a major lull with the TDL stuff. The way kids progress is unpredictable.
BUT I think we will be better next year, even without making any moves.
edit - factor in all the close games. That can turn quickly.
To me, there are two questions that matter with Panarin:
How much of a difference do you think he makes with our first round draft pick? Are we talking going from 2 to 7, or from 6 to 9?
Where will we be in year three of the hypothetical Panarin contract?
Oh it’s not arrogant at all. Average attendance was down 500 a game at The Garden this year and the can count (the actual number of people attending) was down over 800 per game. If you had tickets now you would find out how hard it is to find buyers and how demeaning potential buyers can be (some who are posters here) when all you are asking is STH face.This is kind of an arrogant post and also a little ludicrous. I had season tickets for 10 years and don't look at it much different than I did then.
Even if we get Panarin, do you really think this team can make a cup run in a year or two? That's just setting yourself up for disappointment.
Quick fixes come one way in this league, with a #1 or #2OA. And even then, it generally takes 3-5 years.
Dude, I'm not going to have a semantics conversation on significant UFAs. If the bar is Rafalski and Ward, then fine. You win. UFAs are the way to win cups.Rafalski & Ward
If you guys consider Rafalski a top UFA, no wonder you are smitten with Panarin. So shiny the garden will have to dim the lights.He has 18 points in his last 15 playoff games, he can't handle the checking? What?
Oh it’s not arrogant at all. Average attendance was down 500 a game at The Garden this year and the can count (the actual number of people attending) was down over 800 per game. If you had tickets now you would find out how hard it is to find buyers and how demeaning potential buyers can be (some who are posters here) when all you are asking is STH face.
I don’t necessarily expect a Cup in in a year or two but I want to see a competitive hockey team that can get into and eventually win the playoffs. You build piece by piece. Panarin can be a key piece.
Another top 5 pick in 2020 is fine with me.But that's the thing, even if they improve, can we really expect them to replace the production of Hayes and Zucc? I think that's quite a stretch and will lead to disappointment.
In general, a lot remains to be seen. Because this team could look a whole lot different come the beginning of the season. Kreider, Fast, Names, Shatty, etc. Who knows which of those guys will be on the roster next year.
I guess I just feel like a lot of people are extrapolating our somewhat mediocre year (pre-TDL) and assuming we will naturally improve off that. But completely ignore the fact that we removed 2 of our 4 best forwards who were there for most of the year.
Even if the kids improve and KK and Kravtsov have decent season, I'm not so sure we're any better than last year.
Also, until the D gets fixed, we are in deep ****. I am pretty confident that next year will end up being another developmental year and hopefully in 2021 we can begin looking to make another playoff run.
My worry is Yashin. Good to great numbers, but not getting us anywhere and making too much.I'll add a third...
How do we think Panarin will age? Will he be closer to a Hossa/Selanne or a Mike/Brad Richards?
Dude, I'm not going to have a semantics conversation on significant UFAs. If the bar is Rafalski and Ward, then fine. You win. UFAs are the way to win cups.
Certainly an important factor, but (and maybe I'm crazy here) I'm not as concerned there as Panarin doesn't feel like he'll have negative value by the end of the contract even if he loses two steps if we heavily front-load the contract.I'll add a third...
How do we think Panarin will age? Will he be closer to a Hossa/Selanne or a Mike/Brad Richards?
I rest my caseBut they way it was worded was arrogant. It's pretty snooty to come in here and tell everyone who is making strong points against signing Panarin that if they were 'shelling out 10K' that they would see things differently.
I gave up my tickets 2 years ago because the secondary market became far more complex and my margins fell significantly. I understand what you're talking about. Yet, you completely undermined some solid points you were making with this comment. No one cares that you're spending a fortune to have Rangers season tickets. Make the argument on the merits.