Speculation: Roster Building Thread: Part XIV (To trade or not to trade is the question)

KennyWu

Registered User
Oct 14, 2010
1,191
2,621
| ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ |
| PROVOROV |
| SUCKS. . . . . . |
|. . . . . . . . . . . . .|
| _______|
(\__/) ||
(•ㅅ•) ||
/   づ

maxresdefault.jpg
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Machinehead

Machinehead

HFNYR MVP
Jan 21, 2011
149,216
130,056
NYC
If I were a GM, you'd have a hard time convincing me to move a 1st at the deadline for anything.

"Oh boy howdy, I can lose in 7 instead of losing in 6!"

And the times it worked out, those teams were good enough to win the Cup anyway.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Clark Kellogg

smoneil

Registered User
Jul 14, 2004
5,947
5,118
Rochester, NY
Preds/Rangers Tuesday. I want Stamkos. He'd look great between Laf and Cuylle.

Panarin-Chytil-Berard
Laf-Stamkos-Cuylle

If Drury wants to cement over the cracks in the locker room he needs to extract and replace. Kreider and/or Trocheck are at least somewhat tradeable now and the Rangers have a ton of cap space to take on salary. Stamkos/JT Miller/Dylan Cozens, all strike me as acquirable top 6 guys with term on their deal. The team is not rebuilding and far from a lost cause for the season. Drury just has to man up instead of putting bandaids on.

My understanding was that Stamkos hasn't played center for a few years now. Did Nashville put him back in the middle?
 

SA16

Sixstring
Aug 25, 2006
14,009
13,869
Long Island
Many of us would choose the opposite.

Sure, if you're willing to enjoy a potential decade of misery for the small chance to become Colorado and another chance to become Buffalo/Ottawa go right ahead.

And people would "Choose the opposite" because they think a rebuild is some guaranteed way to become a dynasty when in reality it is much more likely to fail and just get you back to where you originally were or worse.
 

DanielBrassard

It's all so tiresome
May 6, 2014
24,195
23,760
PA from SI
I would like to see the defense with Ruhwedel and Vaakanainen in and Lindgren and Jones out. Replacing Trouba with Mancini/Mackey was obviously always going to be a downgrade because despite how bad people make Trouba out to be he is not as bad as they say (still a good move though given they were somehow able to get out of that contract for positive value).
I agree with all of this except for taking out zac. Removing Trouba was about creating cap space for the future not necessarily making them better right away. That ship sailed when they couldn't trade him in June.
 

LokiDog

Get pucks deep. Get pucks to the net. And, uh…
Sep 13, 2018
12,187
24,591
Dallas
If you are saying the goal is to do a complete rebuild to become a potential Stanley Cup Contender, a strategy that rarely yields results in less than 8 years, I am going to have to disagree about that being a good strategy and that being the goal.

Well, we can probably make it to 100 years and 1 cup if that’s the goal instead. I don’t want to get snarky because it’s not you I have an issue with at all. Good poster. I have simply lost all faith in this team. And as a once upon a time D1 defender, on/off youth coach and lifelong student of the game, I can’t deny that Fox’s combination of less than ideal skating and stature has always given me concerns about his longevity. Never his talent or peak ability, but how long it will last for him. My experience and intuition and observation all tell me you typically need a moderate blend of both, or an extra helping of one or the other.

I know people say it’s simply en vogue to “hate” slow skaters but realistically skating is simply so important. Look at Jason Robertson. He was never a great skater, but worked on it, improved it a good amount, had a couple great years, had foot surgery, lost a step (I’ve got the charts comparing his top/average speed and acceleration from last year/this year and it is genuinely quantifiable) and is currently playing his way out of Dallas if he can’t find a way to produce better now that he lost what little speed he had.

Fox, at no fault of his own, has been leaned on extremely heavily and because of deep playoff runs player more games, and more tough games, than 99% of players in this league. He’s not a big guy with natural physical resiliency like a Trouba or Ovie and he has had some injuries, including leg/ankle injuries. His offensive awareness and ability is still out of the his world but I don’t know how anyone can watch him and not say he looks even slower than in the past or that his foot speed has effected his defending some. Guys like Fox and Robertson, both elite talents, cannot afford to lose even a half a step in a league this fast. I am concerned that he will not remain elite for as long as we hope and that whether it’s a rebuild or retool, his reputation around the league means he is the one singular player we have who would actually get us a genuine future 1C back. The one thing we never have and the one thing even more important than a 1D.

I have a Fox jersey. I am simply trying to be pragmatic. I believe it’s reasonable to say he is a risk to decline quickly due to less than ideal size, less than ideal speed and extremely heavy usage and I don’t feel it’s insane to say he’s the one player who could actually net us THE piece that we could build a future around.
 

Brutananadilewski

Registered User
Nov 6, 2021
4,935
7,403
Wherever the keg is!
Sure, if you're willing to enjoy a potential decade of misery for the small chance to become Colorado and another chance to become Buffalo/Ottawa go right ahead.

And people would "Choose the opposite" because they think a rebuild is some guaranteed way to become a dynasty when in reality it is much more likely to fail and just get you back to where you originally were or worse.

Whoa.

You said "guaranteed" a cup. 10 years of sucktitude but we'll get a cup out of it?

Signed!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boris Zubov

SA16

Sixstring
Aug 25, 2006
14,009
13,869
Long Island
I agree with all of this except for taking out zac. Removing Trouba was about creating cap space for the future not necessarily making them better right away. That ship sailed when they couldn't trade him in June.

Zac needs to watch some games for a bit and have a better understand of where to be. He plays way too aggressively like a fourth forward and the problem is he's not that great offensively. He's good. He's not some offensive dynamo. He needs to be seriously reined in and told to stop pinching and getting caught in deep because he's doing it at times where the risk/reward is very poor.
 

Boris Zubov

No relation to Sergei, Joe
May 6, 2016
19,744
27,832
Back on the east coast
Sure, if you're willing to enjoy a potential decade of misery for the small chance to become Colorado and another chance to become Buffalo/Ottawa go right ahead
This team has won once in the past 85 years. 60-75% of this board was either too young to remember 94 or wasn't even born yet. We've already traded a lifetime of misery watching this team, so at some point I'd like to see them win it all again. I'll gladly take a decade of bad teams afterward if that's the price.
 
Last edited:

Machinehead

HFNYR MVP
Jan 21, 2011
149,216
130,056
NYC
Any scenario which guarantees a Cup is kind of foolish to discuss because like, that's not how anything works?

In the real world, you take the best team that gives you the best chance over a number of years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandiblesofdoom

SA16

Sixstring
Aug 25, 2006
14,009
13,869
Long Island
Well, we can probably make it to 100 years and 1 cup if that’s the goal instead. I don’t want to get snarky because it’s not you I have an issue with at all. Good poster. I have simply lost all faith in this team. And as a once upon a time D1 defender, on/off youth coach and lifelong student of the game, I can’t deny that Fox’s combination of less than ideal skating and stature has always given me concerns about his longevity. Never his talent or peak ability, but how long it will last for him. My experience and intuition and observation all tell me you typically need a moderate blend of both, or an extra helping of one or the other.

I know people say it’s simply en vogue to “hate” slow skaters but realistically skating is simply so important. Look at Jason Robertson. He was never a great skater, but worked on it, improved it a good amount, had a couple great years, had foot surgery, lost a step (I’ve got the charts comparing his top/average speed and acceleration from last year/this year and it is genuinely quantifiable) and is currently playing his way out of Dallas if he can’t find a way to produce better now that he lost what little speed he had.

Fox, at no fault of his own, has been leaned on extremely heavily and because of deep playoff runs player more games, and more tough games, than 99% of players in this league. He’s not a big guy with natural physical resiliency like a Trouba or Ovie and he has had some injuries, including leg/ankle injuries. His offensive awareness and ability is still out of the his world but I don’t know how anyone can watch him and not say he looks even slower than in the past or that his foot speed has effected his defending some. Guys like Fox and Robertson, both elite talents, cannot afford to lose even a half a step in a league this fast. I am concerned that he will not remain elite for as long as we hope and that whether it’s a rebuild or retool, his reputation around the league means he is the one singular player we have who would actually get us a genuine future 1C back. The one thing we never have and the one thing even more important than a 1D.

I have a Fox jersey. I am simply trying to be pragmatic. I believe it’s reasonable to say he is a risk to decline quickly due to less than ideal size, less than ideal speed and extremely heavy usage and I don’t feel it’s insane to say he’s the one player who could actually net us THE piece that we could build a future around.

I don't have enough time now to respond to everything but I would disagree about Fox's heavy usage. His usage is pretty low for a 1D.

31st in TOI among D this year.
26th last year
13th the year before

Among D with 25+ games played
 

LokiDog

Get pucks deep. Get pucks to the net. And, uh…
Sep 13, 2018
12,187
24,591
Dallas
I just think we should have a vision of what we want the team to be, see the pieces we have now, make informed decisions on those pieces, and aggressively pursue the vision based on what's missing and the assets we have to spend.

That vision, for most people, includes an elite defenseman, so trading away the one you already have is moving backwards.

Burning it down just because it's flammable is Sabres team building.

I agree that it includes an elite defenseman (though, even more so, it must include an elite 1C) but it is my opinion (and only that, all love here - we’re all frustrated and just spitting ideas out) that timeline also matters. Fox has never had ideal size or speed, has had injuries and has played tons of tough minutes in his career. I simply don’t believe that the timing for the team to re-shape itself into a TRUE contender will align with him still being elite. As I’ve said, for me, it isn’t burning it down because it’s flammable. It’s making a painful decision to sacrifice an elite player in his prime today in order to acquire a player who will be your elite centerpiece a couple of years down the road, and going forward. I’m sure we could smack together some pieces on the fly and be a playoff team again as early as next year. I would prefer we accept a down couple of years to build a team we genuinely believe can go all the way, and I am concerned that Fox will be exiting his elite years when that happens, thus sacrificing an elite talent today to acquire an elite talent for tomorrow. That’s just my view.
 

Brutananadilewski

Registered User
Nov 6, 2021
4,935
7,403
Wherever the keg is!
This team has one once in the past 85 years. 60-75% of this board was either too young to remember 94 or wasn't even born yet. We've already traded a lifetime of misery watching this team, so at some point I'd like to see them win it all again. I'll gladly take a decade of bad teams afterward if that's the price.

Those 2 Giants Super Bowls seem like a lifetime ago...

With the teams this board roots for, I'm surprised half of us aren't in a penitentiary or an asylum.
 

will1066

If you score four, you better f'n win the game
Oct 12, 2008
49,573
70,207
Zac needs to watch some games for a bit and have a better understand of where to be. He plays way too aggressively like a fourth forward and the problem is he's not that great offensively. He's good. He's not some offensive dynamo. He needs to be seriously reined in and told to stop pinching and getting caught in deep because he's doing it at times where the risk/reward is very poor.

They all do it. To a man. Miller. Schneider. Lindgren. Gus when he was here. Trouba when he was here. And they've all gotten burned for bad pinches at least a few times. Because the forwards can't generate enough off the cycle or win puck battles to keep possession.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandiblesofdoom

Machinehead

HFNYR MVP
Jan 21, 2011
149,216
130,056
NYC
I agree that it includes an elite defenseman (though, even more so, it must include an elite 1C) but it is my opinion (and only that, all love here - we’re all frustrated and just spitting ideas out) that timeline also matters. Fox has never had ideal size or speed, has had injuries and has played tons of tough minutes in his career. I simply don’t believe that the timing for the team to re-shape itself into a TRUE contender will align with him still being elite. As I’ve said, for me, it isn’t burning it down because it’s flammable. It’s making a painful decision to sacrifice an elite player in his prime today in order to acquire a player who will be your elite centerpiece a couple of years down the road, and going forward. I’m sure we could smack together some pieces on the fly and be a playoff team again as early as next year. I would prefer we accept a down couple of years to build a team we genuinely believe can go all the way, and I am concerned that Fox will be exiting his elite years when that happens, thus sacrificing an elite talent today to acquire an elite talent for tomorrow. That’s just my view.
I think most people are on the same page as you as far as accepting a couple of down years.

Most of those people think you're overly concerned about Fox at age 28. Sometimes the guys who never had the athletic ability decline less in the ages where that ability starts to go, because they never had it. Mats Zuccarello is aging like a beautiful oak tree.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Greg02 and LokiDog

CLW

Registered User
Nov 11, 2018
7,446
7,283
There should be only 4 untouchables on the roster:

1) Igor
2) Laf
3) Fox
4) Cuylle


That's it. Everyone else can be had.


Fire Drury

I wouldn't name any names until I am certain they are 100% clean of any country club taint. I don't care about the name, if they have the slightest whiff off they go, the rot has been that bad.

That said, I doubt Cuylle is infected but I'm suspicious of Laffy and Fox. Igor's always been in his own world but then again, that contract of his is ready to start to reek like stinky cheese.
 

LokiDog

Get pucks deep. Get pucks to the net. And, uh…
Sep 13, 2018
12,187
24,591
Dallas
I think most people are on the same page as you as far as accepting a couple of down years.

Most of those people think you're overly concerned about Fox at age 28. Sometimes the guys who never had the athletic ability decline less in the ages where that ability starts to go, because they never had it. Mats Zuccarello is aging like a beautiful oak tree.

That’s fine. Personally, I feel like the early signs are starting to show (in his skating, only) at this point. And I’m also rounding him up to 27 because his birthday is soon. And it isn’t simply about Fox at 28/29. We’re gonna win in that very first year after retooling? That’s what age he will be when the next window even begins. My concern is STARTING the next window of contention relying on a slow 29 year old to not get any slower or worn down physically as an undersized guy with a lot of deep playoff runs already on his body.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad