Speculation: Roster Building Thread - Part XIII (Nanaki edition)

NYR Viper

Registered User
Sep 9, 2007
47,825
18,431
Jacksonville, FL
Here's an option:

To MIN:
Trouba with 50% retained ($4m cap hit for 2 years)

to NYR
Trenin with 50% Retained ($1.75m cap hit for 4 years)
Bogosian ($1.25m cap hit for 2 years)
MIN 2nd '25
MIN 3rd '26
MIN 4th '26


24-25
Rangers cap situation
$4m dead cap with Trouba
$1.75m Trenin
$1.25m Bogosian
= $7m total (Rangers save $1m)

MIN Cap situation
$4m Trouba
$1.75m dead cap Trenin
= $5.75m total (Wild spend $1m)

25-26
Rangers cap situation
$4m dead cap with Trouba
$1.75m Trenin
$1.25m Bogosian
= $7m total (Rangers save $1m)

MIN Cap situation
$4m Trouba
$1.75m dead cap Trenin
= $5.75m total (Wild spend $1m)

26-27
Rangers cap situation
$1.75m Trenin

MIN Cap situation
$1.75m dead cap Trenin
 

Boris Zubov

No relation to Sergei, Joe
May 6, 2016
19,184
26,671
Back on the east coast
Here's an option:

To MIN:
Trouba with 50% retained ($4m cap hit for 2 years)

to NYR
Trenin with 50% Retained ($1.75m cap hit for 4 years)
Bogosian ($1.25m cap hit for 2 years)
MIN 2nd '25
MIN 3rd '26
MIN 4th '26


24-25
Rangers cap situation
$4m dead cap with Trouba
$1.75m Trenin
$1.25m Bogosian
= $7m total (Rangers save $1m)

MIN Cap situation
$4m Trouba
$1.75m dead cap Trenin
= $5.75m total (Wild spend $1m)

25-26
Rangers cap situation
$4m dead cap with Trouba
$1.75m Trenin
$1.25m Bogosian
= $7m total (Rangers save $1m)

MIN Cap situation
$4m Trouba
$1.75m dead cap Trenin
= $5.75m total (Wild spend $1m)

26-27
Rangers cap situation
$1.75m Trenin

MIN Cap situation
$1.75m dead cap Trenin
Don't the Wild still have Parise & Suter on their books? I can't see them retaining that much on Trenin for 3 more years.
 

NYR Viper

Registered User
Sep 9, 2007
47,825
18,431
Jacksonville, FL
Don't the Wild still have Parise & Suter on their books? I can't see them retaining that much on Trenin for 3 more years.

They drop precipitously after this season

1732636494665.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boris Zubov

Machinehead

HFNYR MVP
Jan 21, 2011
148,279
127,402
NYC
While I agree it's not always indicative to on ice success, the bare minimum I want from a captain is the willingness to take the attention off the team and face the music when things go sour. Command the room. It is more important than many realize in this sport.

In this instance, I found it EXTREMELY telling that we did not hear from Trouba, Mika or Trocheck following what I'd call our worst loss of the season given the circumstances.

A leader speaks up and at least attempts to right the ship. Our leaders ran with their tail between their legs. The core has ran its course and they know it. And instead of showing some fire, they cower. Exactly the same mentality that watched them blow a 2-0 lead to Tampa, a 2-0 lead to NJ and a 2-1 lead to Florida. They are petrified at the thought of overcoming adversity.
We have no idea what's actually said in room, where it matters. I couldn't care less what is said to the media, or by who.

You guys watch that shit? Do something else. I can recommend some good video games.
 

HockeyBasedNYC

Feeling it
Aug 2, 2005
20,138
12,224
Here
I know all of the media is saying a deal is rare and not likely to happen at this point in the season, but i feel like this is the type of season with some underperforming clubs and weird starts were it could.

We already saw Boston fire one of the best coaches in the NHL and i think we may see a couple more be on the market soon as well.
 

Machinehead

HFNYR MVP
Jan 21, 2011
148,279
127,402
NYC
Actually the team was awful after dubi was traded with ani bc we had no depth. It forced the trade of gaborik to try to get back on track.

As for Cally, we traded him for a better player in St Loius. He was starting to break down too.

So this is kind of disingenuous on both counts.
Those are both analyses of their on ice play.

We're talking about leadership. If they were such important leaders, why was the team better after they were gone?

I'm being told stuff like that upsets the vibe.

Could it be because those teams were just good at hockey?
 

Oscar Lindberg

Registered User
Dec 14, 2015
16,160
15,668
CA
I’m curious what people’s thought are on Kakko and keeping him long term.

It seems like he was destined to get moved at some point 2 months ago, but I’ve seen the conversation now shift to wanting to keep him long term
 
  • Like
Reactions: SnowblindNYR

Ruggs225

Registered User
Oct 15, 2007
9,206
5,461
Long Island, NY
Those are both analyses of their on ice play.

We're talking about leadership. If they were such important leaders, why was the team better after they were gone?

I'm being told stuff like that upsets the vibe.

Could it be because those teams were just good at hockey?
This is ridiculous.

The rangers werent better after dubinsky was traded until they made other trades for better players.

St. Louis is a better player than cally. And was a good leader too.

I know your upset about Kreider. But this argument is silly.

I brought up Cally bc he was a good captain. He was. Doesnt mean a team cant get better without him, especially when you bring in better players. Especially when there were other good leaders such as Hank in the room.

And for the record. Kreider is a shit leader so we might get better by jettisoning him. At least by your “analysis”
 

Pawnee Rangers

Registered User
Jan 10, 2019
2,622
2,968
Messier would have drug their asses over the coals and made them work.
I don’t think that would make an ounce of difference when it comes to guys like Trouba or Lindgren unless he was planning on taking every other shift on D or forcing Drury to trade one of them like he did with Zubov.

I’m curious what people’s thought are on Kakko and keeping him long term.

It seems like he was destined to get moved at some point 2 months ago, but I’ve seen the conversation now shift to wanting to keep him long term
He’s a good complimentary player.
 

Bob Richards

Mr. Mojo Risin'
Feb 9, 2011
10,913
17,636
Jersey
I’m curious what people’s thought are on Kakko and keeping him long term.

It seems like he was destined to get moved at some point 2 months ago, but I’ve seen the conversation now shift to wanting to keep him long term

I like Kappo Kakko.

If you put your thumb over his draft spot line on his hockey reference page, you realize that you’re actually pretty happy with a good, dependable meat and potatoes player.
 

Machinehead

HFNYR MVP
Jan 21, 2011
148,279
127,402
NYC
This is ridiculous.

The rangers werent better after dubinsky was traded until they made other trades for better players.

St. Louis is a better player than cally. And was a good leader too.

I know your upset about Kreider. But this argument is silly.

I brought up Cally bc he was a good captain. He was. Doesnt mean a team cant get better without him, especially when you bring in better players. Especially when there were other good leaders such as Hank in the room.

And for the record. Kreider is a shit leader so we might get better by jettisoning him. At least by your “analysis”
I have no idea what the f*** you're talking about with this.

Absolutely nowhere did I say the team got better because those guys were bad leaders.

I'm saying we got rid of an entire core of widely liked and respected leaders that people lament about, and the team didn't even blink, so maybe it doesn't matter that much and upgrading the roster is the alpha and the omega.

That's my argument and it's been my argument forever.

@GoAwayPanarin is correct that Dubinsky was a legit good player and we missed him in the short term. We absolutely do not need to go back to Ryan Callahan being one of the worst defensive players since the lockout. That's exactly the kind of "bad player, good vibes" bullshit I'm trying to avoid.

Team building is easy. Get better hockey players. It's undefeated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SnowblindNYR

TGWL

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 28, 2011
16,285
11,043
I’m curious what people’s thought are on Kakko and keeping him long term.

It seems like he was destined to get moved at some point 2 months ago, but I’ve seen the conversation now shift to wanting to keep him long term
He's playing better. It's always a big difference when your line-mates also move their feet and play with effort. I wouldn't offer him along term deal right now of actual money value, where he'd be interested in quickly signing, but if he can maintain playing well it's something the organization should obviously look into. Just not immediately.

When you think long term, I'm guessing you're looking at 4.5 or more to get him to agree? If so, I'd wait. If long term means he's going to take a very bad deal for him, then sure.
 

McRanger92

Registered User
Jun 7, 2017
11,628
21,615
I’m curious what people’s thought are on Kakko and keeping him long term.

It seems like he was destined to get moved at some point 2 months ago, but I’ve seen the conversation now shift to wanting to keep him long term

The Kakko trade rumors were always more media and fan driven than the team shopping him. Kakko and Drury have never said a bad word about the other. He may not become the elite top line guy we expected with the 2nd pick but he's still very good and young. You dont deal those players. I think he is in line with a Chytil like extension.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SnowblindNYR

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad