will1066
If you score four, you better f'n win the game
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2008
- Messages
- 50,777
- Likes
- 72,601
Kinda resembles Tanev
Kinda resembles Tanev
Not really. Zib has 7 season with at least 10 PP goals. Kreider has 3.Zibanejad's stats are buoyed by the one year he scored at a pace close to 70 (@Leonardo87 that's right, buoyed!). He's not the goal-scorer Kreider is.
I see what you did thereNot really. Zib has 7 season with at least 10 PP goals. Kreider has 3.
Zib has 2 seasons of 15 and one of 20.
Kreider has one 18 year and one 26 year.
If anything Kreider has been buoyed by those two abnormal years. Like when he magically popped 50 and had 26 Pp goals. That was not normal.
He's been all over the place pretty much since he got here. The analytics people always said that he has talent, but he's not a guy you hitch the flagship to because he has bad seasons. I think with the new contract, and as the expectations grew, people just noticed it more.I know you like the advanced stats and such. Do you know how to get Zibanejad's WAR% year over year in those player cards or something similar?
I am curious about his rise and fall over the years
It wasn't that abnormal.Not really. Zib has 7 season with at least 10 PP goals. Kreider has 3.
Zib has 2 seasons of 15 and one of 20.
Kreider has one 18 year and one 26 year.
If anything Kreider has been buoyed by those two abnormal years. Like when he magically popped 50 and had 26 Pp goals. That was not normal.
26 Pp goals isnt abnormal? To me it is.It wasn't that abnormal.
Over his last five seasons, Kreider is averaging 39 goals per 82 games. If he didn't get hurt 3 out of 4 years in the middle of his prime, he's probably a 500 goal scorer.
Yeah, 26 was out of the ordinary, and the next year he scored 8 which is not where he's been trending at all so that probably evened out.26 Pp goals isnt abnormal? To me it is.
23% of his PP goals for his career came in one single season. That is abnormal.
The rise and fall of Zibanejad sounds like a wrestling DVD.I know you like the advanced stats and such. Do you know how to get Zibanejad's WAR% year over year in those player cards or something similar?
I am curious about his rise and fall over the years
Yeah, 26 was out of the ordinary, and the next year he scored 8 which is not where he's been trending at all so that probably evened out.
I don't know, man, Kreider is really good at scoring goals. I feel like I'm trying to convince you that Zdeno Chara is tall.
At this point, neither one of them plays the same position Kreider does.I know kreider is good. I just dont think he is irreplaceable.
And also i just eant to see what we have in laff and especially Kakko. I mean we have to make a huge decision on Kakko this offseason and i would hate to make an ill informed one.
I still have faith in Kakko. Just like i did last year in laff.
Yeah on the kreider and zib line that nobody seems to play well with. He have what 30 guys since buch and nobody does well.At this point, neither one of them plays the same position Kreider does.
Kakko has has a RW spot open in front of him for like four years.
leveraging machinehead's kreiderphilia to drag him into the muck to reveal his kakkophobia... it's genius.I know kreider is good. I just dont think he is irreplaceable.
And also i just eant to see what we have in laff and especially Kakko. I mean we have to make a huge decision on Kakko this offseason and i would hate to make an ill informed one.
I still have faith in Kakko. Just like i did last year in laff.
What it proves is he can score both on the PP as well as even strength or short handed. Career wise about 34% of his goals came on the PP. There are a few HOFs that were close to that level including Espo. Can't play the game could have or would have. Just base it on his career and the fact that he will go down as one of the greatest all time Rangers.. something a lot of you take for granted.26 Pp goals isnt abnormal? To me it is.
23% of his PP goals for his career came in one single season. That is abnormal.
And to counter the injury… maybe if he played more games he wouldnt have aged as well and slowed down faster. It works both ways here. Truth is we dont know exactly what his stats would have been.
Plus on top of that he had been notoriously streaky. Whats to say that those injured games werent going to be a cold streak.
Fact is we dont know what couldve been.
Just like we dont know what Laf and Kakko can be until we give them an actual chance
Ahahahahahalet's talk about buch. it's been a while.
Smith is playing fine. Relax 6-1-1.Yeah on the kreider and zib line that nobody seems to play well with. He have what 30 guys since buch and nobody does well.
I just think if we are going to change up the PP that moving laf for zib might not work well and a bigger restructure might need to be done. Or at least should be tried to see if what could happen and what we have in our younger players.
In that case i would move laf and kakko up with trocheck, panarin and fox and move kreider and zibs to pp2.
If that doesnt work, and everything goes to hell on the PP you can always go back to the original setup.
As for even strength… kakko really doesnt have a spot to move up bc nobody plays well with the wonder twins. Though kakko is looking good with chytil and cuylle. So give them more time and call them line 2 and just play zib line less at ES.
Especially in a close game when the chytil line looks to be our best defensive line.
Basically, win enough to get in playoffs, while seeing what the youth can become and make an informed decision for the offseason when contracts are going to need to be shuffled.
At this point, I don't think it's about evaluation. He could be one of those guys who takes off later in his career, a la Kreider, but what he is right now has value. It's just a matter of if we can afford him.Whatever the decision the Rangers make on Kakko, it will hardly be ill-informed. Exactly how more seasons of play and years in the organization are necessary?
Kreider may not be IRreplaceable, but neither is he EASLY replaceable. So why? I mean no one is untouchable, Gretzky was traded. It of course would depend on the deal. It would have to be one f***in hell of a deal to get Kreider out of here looking at his play, his leadership and professionalism AT HIS CAP HIT. He’s frankly a bargain. If that kind of deal could be made, that is CLEARLY better for this team, I guess we have to make it. But I don’t see this management looking to deal him, and, IMO, they shouldn’t be.I know kreider is good. I just dont think he is irreplaceable.
And also i just eant to see what we have in laff and especially Kakko. I mean we have to make a huge decision on Kakko this offseason and i would hate to make an ill informed one.
I still have faith in Kakko. Just like i did last year in laff.
your above premise is a good guideline, rule of thumbAgain, Kreider is not gonna be here forever.
The trick is finding the sweet spot between future value and what you are willing to live with missing. That time is coming.
Teams do trade very good young players, you just have to find the misevaluated ones.
Kreider will not cost us KKI mean mika zibenajad has more Pp goals than kreider yet everyone wants to run him off too.
So does luminaries such as Ryan smith and claude lemiuex.
Like i said. Others have done it. He is replaceable.
They really need to see what laff and Kakko can do with a real shot. This offseason is going to be monumentally important. This regular season is a walkthrough for playoffs. Try nee things now. If they dont work, go back to what did work and then u also know where h stand in offseason.
I still believe Kakko can be a really good player. I will be absolutely pissed if we have to let him go go we keep an aging Kreider. Which is a real possibility.
Lavi taking the A away from Mika and giving it to Rempe after he kills Wilson tomorrow night
let's talk about Kravtsov. It's been a while.let's talk about buch. it's been a while.
LMAOYou clearly missed the "decline and take the loss of down" era of Rangers hockey.