SA16
Sixstring
Why are we possibly wasting deadline cap space by calling Rempe up on an off day? Just call him up tomorrow if they actually intend on playing him then, and if they don't, don't call him (or anyone) up at all.
Ok, but that is not how a powerplay works. Panarin/Trocheck aren't succeeding on their own. They are succeeding as part of the unit. Who is to say they would still be performing at the same level without a one time threat on the left side (whether or not you think Mika is good at that is really immaterial since teams still account for it defensively). Would Panarin have as much room on the right side and Trocheck in the bumper without Kreider in front and the defense knowing they need to collapse down low to defend him since he is very dangerous at tipping pucks and getting rebounds if they leave him space?
You could say Panarin is a great player and he would produce on the PP at a similar level without that structure but would he? In four years in CBJ/CHI he never had more than 24 points in a season on the PP. The last 3 years as a Ranger he's had 44,36,37. That is not just the league being higher scoring. In 18-19 Kucherov led the league with 48 PPP. Panarin was T-68 with 18. In his last 3 years as a Ranger, all in this setup, he's been 7th, 12th, 4th, and is currently T-12.
How do u know if we never try. Lav has never tried different combos. Its the same thing over and over again.
This PP feels stale. Whats the harm in trying something new for 10 games. We need to see what Kakko and Laf are truly capable of. Especially with the upcoming offseason.
You can always go back to the original setup. If it isnt working.
To me the early regular season os the time to tinker for this team. Its not like we are going to miss the playoffs.
But lav is proving very stubborn in making changes.
Z for Z 1 for 1 everybody winsZegras 2p in 8
Our powerplay setup is braindead. It only works because Panarin and Fox are savants.Ok, but that is not how a powerplay works. Panarin/Trocheck aren't succeeding on their own. They are succeeding as part of the unit. Who is to say they would still be performing at the same level without a one time threat on the left side (whether or not you think Mika is good at that is really immaterial since teams still account for it defensively). Would Panarin have as much room on the right side and Trocheck in the bumper without Kreider in front and the defense knowing they need to collapse down low to defend him since he is very dangerous at tipping pucks and getting rebounds if they leave him space?
You could say Panarin is a great player and he would produce on the PP at a similar level without that structure but would he? In four years in CBJ/CHI he never had more than 24 points in a season on the PP. The last 3 years as a Ranger he's had 44,36,37. That is not just the league being higher scoring. In 18-19 Kucherov led the league with 48 PPP. Panarin was T-68 with 18. In his last 3 years as a Ranger, all in this setup, he's been 7th, 12th, 4th, and is currently T-12.
Nothing wrong with trying new things but you are extremely unlikely to improve on a PP that finished 11th best in the last 20 years last year.
What I don't understand is why we get the whole speech nonstop of it going "Stale" every time it goes a couple of games without scoring. The best PPs are like 27%. With that rates they will all go games without scoring.
Z for Z 1 for 1 everybody wins
Our powerplay setup is braindead. It only works because Panarin and Fox are savants.
What other team runs this dumb ass alignment? Zib can stay on PP1 but they need to change the alignment and get him in the middle.
The Bergeron reverse hit maybe took something out of him .I just started watching that Amazon Prime hockey series..In the first couple episodes, Filip Forsberg's wife said how scary the physical aspect of the game is to her after Forsberg got a concussion, plus having a child and another baby on the way, and how she told him no more fighting or something to that effect. Quite possible Zib and his wife had a similar conversation about playing it safer given his past injuries and having a kid now.
It's hard to choose right now. Both have has some great playoff years. Scoring is up now so naturally you think the edge should go to Shesterkin, but then you remember what turds were standing in front of Henrik. If you want to compare career or first several seasons, the numbers won't favor Lundqvist. But If you look at the window of opportunity we had when competing, Lundqvist posted a Sv% .930/ GAA 2.05 in 76 playoff games during that 2011- end of 2015 season range.Shesty is a better playoff goalie than Hank was.
Anyone who doesn’t think that he’s stolen them a series wasn’t watching in 2022 when he stole them 2. They housed the Caps last year and I think they were better than Carolina in their series when you look at it on the hole but he stole game 3 and was the better goalie in game 2 when both guys were good.
its not working.But it's the same thing over and over and over! Success.
Crazy obsession with padding some guys stats at the expense of team success. It's stale. Ha. Other teams wish they were so stale. Tough to find any coach who will take apart something that works.
It just comes down to whether you think a half wall player putting up one assist in an hour of power play time is a fluke or notOk, but that is not how a powerplay works. Panarin/Trocheck aren't succeeding on their own. They are succeeding as part of the unit. Who is to say they would still be performing at the same level without a one time threat on the left side (whether or not you think Mika is good at that is really immaterial since teams still account for it defensively). Would Panarin have as much room on the right side and Trocheck in the bumper without Kreider in front and the defense knowing they need to collapse down low to defend him since he is very dangerous at tipping pucks and getting rebounds if they leave him space?
You could say Panarin is a great player and he would produce on the PP at a similar level without that structure but would he? In four years in CBJ/CHI he never had more than 24 points in a season on the PP. The last 3 years as a Ranger he's had 44,36,37. That is not just the league being higher scoring. In 18-19 Kucherov led the league with 48 PPP. Panarin was T-68 with 18. In his last 3 years as a Ranger, all in this setup, he's been 7th, 12th, 4th, and is currently T-12.
should be a crying reaction on hereyou know who id trade zib for straight up?
pavel buchnevich
Im surprised the team doesn’t cry about jt miller more.let's talk about buch. it's been a while.
He sucked as a Ranger, sucked as a Lightning. I highly doubt he became the player he is today without the wake-up call of being traded twice in a year, he’s said as such. And still despite the player he’s become he still has a lot of warts and is still prone to making absolutely bonehead plays very often and is still butting heads in lockerrooms (with Pettersson, and formerly Horvat). Buch was also like the only RW ever to have chemistry with Kreider-MikaIm surprised the team doesn’t cry about jt miller more.
IMO that’s plausible….Quite possible Zib and his wife had a similar conversation about playing it safer given his past injuries and having a kid now.
IMO that’s plausible
Can somebody send a link to todays GDT
Oh boy, powerplay discourse.
It's 25% for the season.