mrmovies779
The Greatest Teacher,Failure is.
- Feb 5, 2013
- 7,979
- 8,502
Hartford is exactly where Othmann should go.His play away from the puck in all 3 zones was atrocious.he has a lot to still work on
On Panarin it wouldn't surprise me if or before his contract is up the Rangers try to sign him again for a bit less money and for a somewhat shorter term length. He'll be 35 when his next contract kicks in. Perreault coming on board probably after next year seems to have some of the same things Artemi has.
I wanted Othmann to force his way on this team and he didn't, he needs to have his jt Miller moment
I'm doubting Panarin gives us much of a discount. I mean what would that look like? 8 mill? 6 mill? Realistically you'd want it under 5.
Under $5 is completely unrealistic (and unreasonable). I’m two years with cap going up $8+ for 4 years be my guess for discounted rate.I wanted Othmann to force his way on this team and he didn't, he needs to have his jt Miller moment
I'm doubting Panarin gives us much of a discount. I mean what would that look like? 8 mill? 6 mill? Realistically you'd want it under 5.
maybe not but we've got a surplus of wingers.Othmann cut
Unbelievable. He wasn't bad as some others.
smarter to deal him and get something once he is willing to waiveOn Panarin it wouldn't surprise me if or before his contract is up the Rangers try to sign him again for a bit less money and for a somewhat shorter term length. He'll be 35 when his next contract kicks in. Perreault coming on board probably after next year seems to have some of the same things Artemi has.
not necessarily although mo $ for a bit of term might have been ok dep on the #sThe biggest flop so far is that we never signed Laf to an 8x8 deal this year before the season. This is how teams stay in the hunt long term, you get your young players signed long term at rates that will surely become bargains a quarter way through the deal.
he will get 8ish min from somewhere 4-5 yrs and maybe mo per if he takes less termUnder $5 is completely unrealistic (and unreasonable). I’m two years with cap going up $8+ for 4 years be my guess for discounted rate.
Last night kakko had a few moments where he actually pulled away from someone with the puck. both shocked me and gave me hope. I'm still mildly hopeful that a full season of chytil with kakko is the change we need.Othmann didn’t do enough offensively to make up for his play away from the puck. Kakko at least makes the right plays defensively.
Do you think Panarin is suddenly turning into about a 50 point player this year and next year? Because outside of that there is no way he is signing anywhere for under 5M. Ridiculous. Stamkos just signed for 8M/yr for 4 years at that age in one of the famous No Tax States and he's not even as good.
Do you sign him to the Stamkos deal?People who want to move on from Panarin greatly underestimate how inept this organization is at finding & developing offensive talent. Panarin is one of the most offensively talented players in the league and fell into our laps. He's also not a guy who depends on physical attributes to excel and has a lot less mileage on his body than most players his age due to how late he came to the NHL. He's a guy who I think will produce well into his older years, hell he just had his most productive season of his career. Combining regular season & playoffs he just had the most points in franchise history. Even with first and second overall picks falling into our laps for the first time in franchise history we don't have anything remotely close to Panarin to show for it.
Othmann cut
Unbelievable. He wasn't bad as some others.
I agree, but do you want to hand him a 3 or 4 year deal? People were complaining about the length of the last one
Do you sign him to the Stamkos deal?
No thanks.On Panarin it wouldn't surprise me if or before his contract is up the Rangers try to sign him again for a bit less money and for a somewhat shorter term length. He'll be 35 when his next contract kicks in. Perreault coming on board probably after next year seems to have some of the same things Artemi has.
Rock and hard place, my friend lol! Rock and hard place.Are we looking at the same exact roster as last year minus Gus plus Jones and having Smith in the top 6? I can't get too excited over that. Then again, the alternative is the Giants.
NoSo Berard makes the team? He wasn't sent down. Rangers have 27 players still.
Panarin
Lindgren
Vesey
Rangers should put Vesey and Lindgren on IR.
Which would make 25. Send down Brodzinski and waive Ruhwedal
Berard is a lot more gritty and physical than St.Louis was. Different style of players despite their size.No
deal Vesey + Lindy now
Brodz deserves to stay
Berard showing nothing
He's 5'9
if he's gonna stick NHL level he has to play like Marty St. Louis
right now he is not even remotely close to that
Not so sure, but even still, guys are bigger, stronger, faster now.Berard is a lot more gritty and physical than St.Louis was. Different style of players despite their size.
I'm ok with 3x7, but beyond that I feel he's already getting slower. I dont wanna sound like a panarin beater because I love having him here, I'm just looking us having a 12 mill goalie and likely an 8 mill Laf and whatever Miller gets and I'm wondering how it all fits.Of course I would be open to signing him to a 3-4 year deal. He'll be 34 to start the year not 40. Whether or not it's worth it depends on how he plays over the next two years and what else is available at that time.
St.louis was built like a tank. I love Berard but unless he bulks up I doubt he's gonna be able to play like that in the nhl and stay healthy. If he plays like Fast he can be a nice player for us.Berard is a lot more gritty and physical than St.Louis was. Different style of players despite their size.