I may be wrong, but isn't that what they tried to do with Henrik when they gave him that big contract?It’s on wonder boy Drury to make everything else work around Shesty’s deal. Not Shestyorkin
I may be wrong, but isn't that what they tried to do with Henrik when they gave him that big contract?It’s on wonder boy Drury to make everything else work around Shesty’s deal. Not Shestyorkin
What’s in it for Bruins? They went to $8 AAV for Swayman. Maybe through negotiations it could get up to $8.5-$9.0 which is very far from what’s Shesterkin seeking. LotCrazy idea, but with Swayman and the Bruins at odds...
Trade Shesty for Swayman?
Swayman would have to agree to a 1-year deal initially for about what Shesty is making now, but we could then give him a long-term deal in January.
Swayman is younger and will probably take less than 12 mil.
Don’t think this will be nearly enough on 8 year deal. Anything that starts with $11 and somewhat close to $11.5m will be a winning negotiation for Drury / the teamI think maybe 10.6 is the max I’d be ok with. It lets him reset the market. He’s younger than helleybuck, and he’s had better consistent seasons and more games than sorokin.
He can make arguments that he’s the best goalie in the league. So let him get the highest contract.
Most of the cup increase will go to these internal issues. Trouba’s and Lindgren’s cap hits too. Hopefully there will be some breathing room starting a year after.next year is the concern. Yes the cap is going up, but we have Laf and miller to extend. Potentially Lindgren as well.
So we’re looking at 6m + just for Igor.Don’t think this will be nearly enough on 8 year deal. Anything that starts with $11 and somewhat close to $11.5m will be a winning negotiation for Drury / the team
Most of the cup increase will go to these internal issues. Trouba’s and Lindgren’s cap hits too. Hopefully there will be some breathing room starting a year after.
Its why the lightning havent been won after the first year of Vasy’s contract. All the other key players needed big contracts and they started jettisoning them.So we’re looking at 6m + just for Igor.
Probably similar for Laf.
You’ve got Kakko who may or may not deserve to be resigned.
Miller probably gets 6m (2m raise)
That’s an increase of 18 million split between 3 players.
Trouba is -8m
Lindgren is 4m
So that’s 12m and the cap likely jumps 4.
We’re 2 million short, and it’s not counting replacing those players who leave.
And that’s assuming Kakko walks.
The math doesn’t work.
So, maybe the takeaway here is that defense wins championships. Who'da thunk it?
Yes. I’m obviously advocating experimenting during the rev season for the sake of playoff preparedness. Since our PP went 2 for 27 over the last 10 postseason games to end our run… To quote Col Kurtz “The horror, the HORROR.” Hahahah. Yeah. Let’s just run that back. I’m not advocating just throwing a new unit out in game 7. How can you actually read the posts you are responding to and say that? How are we just throwing them out there when I’m saying we should already have them ready. And where did I say game 7? We did t even make game 7. This is frankly amazing.Saying it like that doesn't change that you're still advocating to try different units, regardless if whatever players being used is working through-out the season. That's the issue I have with it.
We won games because of the powerplay. We probably goes as far as we did in the playoffs because of the powerplay. There's a bigger issue with this team than what happens when the powerplay runs cold, and if you don't address that while potentially scoring less goals/winning less games because we're hindering our good powerplay or try new looks, then it potentially becomes a bigger issue. I also don't think that when you suddenly throw them out in game 7 it's going to net the results you want. But that's fine. We can disagree here.
This makes sense. PP success is a pretty ephemeral thing that could disappear / appear without an obvious reason - messing with the structure could take a sliver of confidence from the players and with it - success in execution.I won't pretend like I could say for sure, but my answer would be probably not. This isn't an NFL playbook like we're going to toss out things the PK wasn't expecting and all of a sudden put them on their heals. Trying different things for when we might need them just means we're not playing them that often. Chances are when tossing then together for when we need won't result in a spark and might take longer to get going. How often are we using these units that we're trying in case we need them? I just think you're potentially creating a bigger problem that might even reduce our powerplay success. I'm all for pulling players, units, etc for when they look like total ass. But intentionally changing it up when it's working just to get different looks seems like it'll have the opposite results you're looking for.
This is exactly why cap crunch will be difficult in 25-26 with maybe some relief coming a year later. These remaining $2m are not precise and will be dealt with lots of penny pinching on these and smaller contracts, carrying 21-22 instead of 24 etc.So we’re looking at 6m + just for Igor.
Probably similar for Laf.
You’ve got Kakko who may or may not deserve to be resigned.
Miller probably gets 6m (2m raise)
That’s an increase of 18 million split between 3 players.
Trouba is -8m
Lindgren is 4m
So that’s 12m and the cap likely jumps 4.
We’re 2 million short, and it’s not counting replacing those players who leave.
And that’s assuming Kakko walks.
The math doesn’t work.
You're looking at multiple ELC's including 2 in the top 6.This is exactly why cap crunch will be difficult in 25-26 with maybe some relief coming a year later. These remaining $2m are not precise and will be dealt with lots of penny pinching on these and smaller contracts, carrying 21-22 instead of 24 etc.
You're looking at multiple ELC's including 2 in the top 6.
Perrault is fine, but you're probably gonna need to force one of othmann or berard in there even if they're not ready.
If Kakko somehow breaks out (doubtful not impossible) you can't keep him too.
Theres a legit concern we'd be a wild card team. We'd have holes all over the roster.
Panarin comes off in 26-27, and that does open up space, but only if we don't re-sign him, which considering he's been the best FA signing in the past 20+ years. Thats gonna be a tough one.
Because he’s still top 5 in points in the regular season. And you do have to replace his production and that’s not easy.Why would the Rangers want overpay "again" for one of the worst playoff preformers in the league. I'd rather have Marner in the playoffs.
The goalie affects his teams play. Can they take chances? Sure Shesty’s back there. Are we ahead, yep Shesty made a couple of big saves to bail our asses out. Let’s keep playing hard because shesty’s back there keeping us in the game.No its not. A player away from
The puck can make a huge difference. Especially defensively.
The goalie literally makes no difference if the puck is not in the zone.
If drai loses his man it can lead to a goal. Drai moving without the puck glto get open can lead to a goal. A blown check, a good check etc.
Shesty could be taking a nap when the puck is in the attacking zone and nothing really change. It has no impact on the game. Once the puck goes in the defensive zone is when he really “plays”
To me a goalie is like a field goal kicker in football. An elite one can win you the game, a bad one can cost u a game. But you should never build your team around one. The difference between avg and elite is not a whole hell of a lot.
You are better off spending the extra cap on al good defense and checking centers. If u have an elite checking center who can neutralize the other teams top players it is a much better return. And will have a much bigger effect on the game.
The goalie affects his teams play. Can they take chances? Sure Shesty’s back there. Are we ahead, yep Shesty made a couple of big saves to bail our asses out. Let’s keep playing hard because shesty’s back there keeping us in the game.
You really think he had no impact on the team’s come from behind wins?
Field goal kicker. What a joke
Why would the Rangers want overpay "again" for one of the worst playoff preformers in the league. I'd rather have Marner in the playoffs.
If Rempe can improve his skating, why can’t Fox? I hope his skating does not get worse as he gets older. He will be a liability on defense.
I dare say there are a few closer to that mark but it really doesn't matter, that is my very point. We clearly have enough talent to make these post seasons without having someone doing an impression of Hasek; so with more money to spend on better skaters, I am taking the average goalie getting hot in the POs. We have seen this again, and again, and again.Ok. Now find me average goaltending who’s consistently average, and doesn’t fluctuate between terrible and good.
Good goalies are rare because they’re fairly consistent, but the position has huge variables, and that variation makes it really hard.
No one cares about regular seasonBecause he’s still top 5 in points in the regular season. And you do have to replace his production and that’s not easy.
Regular season does matter though. You know what was nice last season? Essentially getting a bye getting to play a shitty team like Washington.No one cares about regular season
It actually matters a lot, ending up in a first round series vs Florida would not be ideal.Regular season does matter though. You know what was nice last season? Essentially getting a bye getting to play a shitty team like Washington.
I do. I watch almost every game and I’d like to watch the team win and improve their chance at home advantage for playoffs.No one cares about regular season
It was pretty evident they were running it back and only interested in replacing our bottom 3 forwards and filling holes on d.This was probably one of the worse training camps I’ve ever seen. They didn’t experiment with anything.
Would have loved to see Mika and kreider broken up