See, did you need to include this paragraph in your post? There're plenty reasons to justify upgrading on Lindgren, and specifically at this point in time but your argument for physical regression at the age of 26 doesn't hold water and makes people skeptical of the whole post or needlessly derail the discussion. You make this specifically for Lindgren that goes against what we know on the issue of regression. Yes, he's on a smaller side, yes he's taking physical punishment and player in similar circumstances show eventual regression. But this regression happens nowhere age 26. Why special case for Lindgren? He hasn't had career threatening injuries, he doesn't have a habit of missing significant parts of the season due to injuries (e.g. Chytil). So making Lindgren "special" just illustrates your bias rather than an objective view.