Roster Building Thread - Part XI (Off-season edition)

Status
Not open for further replies.

McRanger92

Registered User
Jun 7, 2017
11,421
21,109
I wanted Zadorov until I just saw a video on twitter of him getting challenged by Goodrow after a high hit and backing down. Sad!
 

Guyute

Registered User
Sponsor
Feb 17, 2013
1,963
2,345
lol @ one model showing him 73rd percentile in finishing and another at 4th percentile in finish war.
They are the same guy's models but from last summer and the January 30, 2024. In the latter post (4th %ile finishing WAR), he suggested mean regression because Colton was generating chances as expected but the puck hadn't been going in.
 

Savant

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Oct 3, 2013
38,332
11,456
I don't think he'll ever be a big producer but he's the type of guy who can facilitate with skill players. I could see him being an excellent compliment.
Maybe? But they are going to need to find extra offensive output from somewhere else. Hopefully better puck moving D. But there needs to be more point getters at some points. Offense has to come from somewhere
 

DanielBrassard

It's all so tiresome
May 6, 2014
23,728
22,660
PA from SI
I don't know how much Kakko actually creates chances.

He has the puck. That's what he's good at. He does nothing to connect that possession to offense.
I think jfresh posted his allthreezones numbers a bit ago, and the numbers were about what you would expect for Kakko. The guy just creates zero offense lol. His point totals are more than appropriate.
 

Machinehead

HFNYR MVP
Jan 21, 2011
147,982
126,775
NYC
Maybe? But they are going to need to find extra offensive output from somewhere else. Hopefully better puck moving D. But there needs to be more point getters at some points. Offense has to come from somewhere
I would say we have plenty of point-getters. Our offense does need to improve overall, but that's going to come from guys doing specific things like distributing better, becoming more cycle-heavy, and overall each of our lines becoming more versatile.

I don't think this team has trouble offensively because they're doing things right and just have nobody that puts the puck in the net. Kakko, yes. For the team as a whole, I think it's mostly the other way around.

They get by because they have guys that put the puck in the net despite not seeing it a ton.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DanielBrassard

Savant

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Oct 3, 2013
38,332
11,456
I would say we have plenty of point-getters. Our offense does need to improve overall, but that's going to come from guys doing specific things like distributing better, becoming more cycle-heavy, and overall each of our lines becoming more versatile.

I don't think this team has trouble offensively because they're doing things right and just have nobody that puts the puck in the net. Kakko, yes. For the team as a whole, I think it's mostly the other way around.

They get by because they have guys that put the puck in the net despite not seeing it a ton.
It’s low volume, but how sustainable is that? I’m hoping the defense is diversified a bit with more puck moving and the offense ticks up from that, but besides (hopefully) Lafreniere, who is really going to be trending up offensively? Especially at 5x5
 

Machinehead

HFNYR MVP
Jan 21, 2011
147,982
126,775
NYC
You know who was an absolute f***ing savage at facilitating? Carl Hagelin.

He always got the puck/won battles, and then turned it into a chance.

He had very little skill but he was able to immediately get the puck to somebody who know what they were doing, or just send it to the net. He had no hesitation in his game.

Kakko would be valuable if he did that, but I just don't think he processes offense at the NHL level.

The IQ isn't there. It's the one thing you really have a hard time working on at this level.
 

SA16

Sixstring
Aug 25, 2006
13,909
13,649
Long Island
They are the same guy's models but from last summer and the January 30, 2024. In the latter post (4th %ile finishing WAR), he suggested mean regression because Colton was generating chances as expected but the puck hadn't been going in.

Ah didn't notice that since he changed the format.

Honestly, even worse to have the same model show that much of a difference based on one year. Especially given in 22-23 he shot 12/123 at 5v5 (9.8%) and last year up until Jan 30 he shot 5/66 (7.6%) hardly some huge difference to result in a wildly different model output.
 

McRanger92

Registered User
Jun 7, 2017
11,421
21,109
Im liking the Colton idea more and more. Would be a very Trocheck-ian move to replace Chytil or Kakko's spot in the lineup with him
 

Fitzy

Very Stable Genius
Jan 29, 2009
35,732
23,019
You know who was an absolute f***ing savage at facilitating? Carl Hagelin.

He always got the puck/won battles, and then turned it into a chance.

He had very little skill but he was able to immediately get the puck to somebody who know what they were doing, or just send it to the net. He had no hesitation in his game.

Kakko would be valuable if he did that, but I just don't think he processes offense at the NHL level.

The IQ isn't there. It's the one thing you really have a hard time working on at this level.

Hagelin was the LW version of what we've so often needed on the right side.

Heck, I'd take a Pouliot on the right side.

Kakko doesn't fit with any of our other scoring forwards in terms of style. He'd be much better in the right system on the right line.

I don't think we'd get great value in a trade for him, but I think our wing position needs more speed and jitter-bugs. That kid in Washington- Brendan Leipsic? Would have been perfect had he not turned out to be such a piece of shit.
 

eco's bones

Registered User
Jul 21, 2005
26,807
13,759
Elmira NY
I wanted Zadorov until I just saw a video on twitter of him getting challenged by Goodrow after a high hit and backing down. Sad!

Zadorov's fought enough guys of some merit that that doesn't even concern me.

He's kind of a Beukeboom type. A little more offense but his game has not always been all that consistent. Not against the player necessarily but against spending too much on him. My guess is he would slot in as a 4 or a 5 D for us. My next guess is some team is going to give him a huge contract which is not something I would do. I can see him and I can not see him depending on the contract but I'm thinking he'll sign somewhere else.
 

McRanger92

Registered User
Jun 7, 2017
11,421
21,109
Zadorov's fought enough guys of some merit that that doesn't even concern me.

He's kind of a Beukeboom type. A little more offense but his game has not always been all that consistent. Not against the player necessarily but against spending too much on him. My guess is he would slot in as a 4 or a 5 D for us. My next guess is some team is going to give him a huge contract which is not something I would do. I can see him and I can not see him depending on the contract but I'm thinking he'll sign somewhere else.

He needs to be able to handle top 4 minutes if we sign him to any contract. if he can't or they arent confident he can, avoid him. There's just not a lot out there on defense. Unless there's an RFA d-man available im not privy to, the UFA market looks like a lot of guys who will get overpaid and overplayed.
 

Machinehead

HFNYR MVP
Jan 21, 2011
147,982
126,775
NYC
It’s low volume, but how sustainable is that? I’m hoping the defense is diversified a bit with more puck moving and the offense ticks up from that, but besides (hopefully) Lafreniere, who is really going to be trending up offensively? Especially at 5x5
Right now, we don't need anybody trending up.

Panarin, Zibanejad, Trocheck, and Kreider can fill the net.

I do think we can absolutely use some more skill, especially in regard to passing, but I don't think we need big scorers.
 

n8

WAAAAAAA!!!
Nov 7, 2002
12,172
3,425
san francisco
Visit site
Assuming the roster stays the same, Lindgren / Schneider stay and collectively take up 6-7M cap, that leaves us with around $6M to sign a player this off season. Is that correct?
 

bleedblue94

Registered User
Jun 8, 2004
9,228
9,676
I wanted Zadorov until I just saw a video on twitter of him getting challenged by Goodrow after a high hit and backing down. Sad!
welcome to the rational side of the zadorov debate. he isnt what people want him to be. if he was with his size and tools he would be a top 20 d man in the league. he just isn't that.

he is not a top pair minutes guy, he has been better his career playing bottom 4 mins

Right now, we don't need anybody trending up.

Panarin, Zibanejad, Trocheck, and Kreider can fill the net.

I do think we can absolutely use some more skill, especially in regard to passing, but I don't think we need big scorers.
I think it is a little dangerous to expect those 4 to do what they did last year again this season. Trocheck just had a career year, panarin and kreider are approaching the ages of decline, and zib just has not looked the same the last couple years. I would be cautious with this...
 

Profet

Longtime lurker
Sponsor
Jul 5, 2002
7,317
10,415
NY
shop.profetkeyboards.com
You know who was an absolute f***ing savage at facilitating? Carl Hagelin.

He always got the puck/won battles, and then turned it into a chance.

He had very little skill but he was able to immediately get the puck to somebody who know what they were doing, or just send it to the net. He had no hesitation in his game.

Kakko would be valuable if he did that, but I just don't think he processes offense at the NHL level.

The IQ isn't there. It's the one thing you really have a hard time working on at this level.
Hagelin must have been 5 times (I'm not trying to exaggerate) faster than Kakko.

Hagelin had serious wheels.

Skating is so important in today's NHL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Guyute

Savant

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Oct 3, 2013
38,332
11,456
Right now, we don't need anybody trending up.

Panarin, Zibanejad, Trocheck, and Kreider can fill the net.

I do think we can absolutely use some more skill, especially in regard to passing, but I don't think we need big scorers.
Right I mean you try to help some of the puck moving on D and you get better passing more goals. If they need a big scorer they can do that at the deadline but they need to resolve the d issues asap
 

GoAwayPanarin

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
May 27, 2008
44,188
57,148
In High Altitoad
Right I mean you try to help some of the puck moving on D and you get better passing more goals. If they need a big scorer they can do that at the deadline but they need to resolve the d issues asap

It’s certainly the more pressing issue.

I don’t see any reason why they can’t address or start to address both.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad