Chytilmania
Registered User
- Dec 31, 2017
- 4,766
- 7,284
Nope even strength only.True, but Im sure a good portion of that could be the PP time, and since I was negating the PP scoring I didn’t think it would be fair to include that extra time as a factor.
He put up 45 at ES. About 5 more than Kakko last year and plays zero defense. I also don't care that the cap is going up slightly next year. A nearly 6 million dollar contract is a lot to pay for a guy who is not going to get PP time and may put up 45 points. He is also injured at the moment so why would the Rangers do this now.i mean the cap goes up next season, people forget this thing happens
trade goodrow hes got a 3.6 mill cap hit....zegras is soo one dimensional he put up over 60 points last year, man id hate to have that on our team going forward
zegras is 22 not 29 i mean come on people
serious question about zegras but what about his GAME says he is a player we need here?what does he do that helps this team and fills it's issues, especially if you are talking about moving him to the wing when we need a center?Can Zegras move to Wing and be more effective?
and no speed, which continues to be an issue with the team and franchiseHe put up 45 at ES. About 5 more than Kakko last year and plays zero defense. I also don't care that the cap is going up slightly next year. A nearly 6 million dollar contract is a lot to pay for a guy who is not going to get PP time and may put up 45 points. He is also injured at the moment so why would the Rangers do this now.
If this happens it's not happening until the summer anyway. Zegras has played only 20 games and hasn't played since early January.That's a giant if. Fitting Zegras' salary wouldn't be an issue regardless. You'll be removing KK, who would be making around $3M.
Again for those who aren't following closely, I really don't want Zegras....but if this trade is presented, I'm all over it.
I hate to say this but if chytil comes back next year I doubt he makes it to new years. love the kid, love the player, hate this for himNobody seems to be mentioning the all important contract that comes along with this overrated and 1 dimensional player. 5.75 mil is alot to pay a 3rd line center and what if Chytil comes back next year.
This is skewing numbers to fit your narrative. Last year at ES, Kakko was at 37, Zegras at 48. That's an 11 point difference not 5.He put up 45 at ES. About 5 more than Kakko last year and plays zero defense. I also don't care that the cap is going up slightly next year. A nearly 6 million dollar contract is a lot to pay for a guy who is not going to get PP time and may put up 45 points. He is also injured at the moment so why would the Rangers do this now.
clicks. why is buffalo trading him? the biggest piece from trading eichel, the guy that reenergized their fan base? he isn't the one they need to move out of there to change the room and mix. just seems weird if they move himRangers in on Tuch?
NHL Radio says so
as @Boris Zubov said the gap was actually 11He put up 45 at ES. About 5 more than Kakko last year and plays zero defense. I also don't care that the cap is going up slightly next year. A nearly 6 million dollar contract is a lot to pay for a guy who is not going to get PP time and may put up 45 points. He is also injured at the moment so why would the Rangers do this now.
I was estimating. So what 11 instead of 5, let's make the deal today then. Get Drury on the phone.This is skewing numbers to fit your narrative. Last year at ES, Kakko was at 37, Zegras at 48. That's an 11 point difference not 5.
EF said the Rangers have inquired about Tuch. Doesn't mean Buffalo is trading him.clicks. why is buffalo trading him? the biggest piece from trading eichel, the guy that reenergized their fan base? he isn't the one they need to move out of there to change the room and mix. just seems weird if they move him
Exactly...just because teams have inquired, doesn't mean Buffalo is interested.clicks. why is buffalo trading him? the biggest piece from trading eichel, the guy that reenergized their fan base? he isn't the one they need to move out of there to change the room and mix. just seems weird if they move him
I agree this would be a summertime move. We need bodies for a playoff run, we're already light on RW.I was estimating. So what 11 instead of 5, let's make the deal today then. Get Drury on the phone.
Why are we even talking about this anyway? He is injured right now and will not be a deadline acquisition. If they are trading for anybody from Anaheim right now it is for Vatrano/Henrique.as @Boris Zubov said the gap was actually 11
i dont know why people dont think zegras can continue to grow as a player....he literally is a young version of patty kane and people on here are worried he doesnt play defense? on the rangers he'd be a PPG player at the least and our core with laf, fox, shesty, perrault, etc going forward would look amazing
i never said this was a mid season deal....this is a roster building thread and we also build the roster in the off-seasonWhy are we even talking about this anyway? He is injured right now and will not be a deadline acquisition. If they are trading for anybody from Anaheim right now it is for Vatrano/Henrique.
clicks. why is buffalo trading him? the biggest piece from trading eichel, the guy that reenergized their fan base? he isn't the one they need to move out of there to change the room and mix. just seems weird if they move him
you can also easily point to the fact that for those points zegras was playing 1st line minutes 5v5 (yes 1st line d matchups too but playing with offensive talent) and kakko has been buried mostly on the 3rd line for his post draft career.This is skewing numbers to fit your narrative. Last year at ES, Kakko was at 37, Zegras at 48. That's an 11 point difference not 5.
I know I am in the minority, but I don't love power. I like him, but don't love him.EF said they asked about him, I don't doubt that they did. I'm pretty sure Buffalo told Drury to f*** off.
In on him and asked about him are different things. NHL radio needs to differentiate between the 2. Now if he is available, they need to get this done with out getting done. This is a player you can deal top prospects for. Push Lindgren+ in a deal and find his replacement elsewhere to clear some space.
Wish they had a good LD worth trading for. Power is basically the NYR FO wet dream but he isn't going anywhere. Samuelsson sucks. He's a bigger, less durable Lindgren.
as @Boris Zubov said the gap was actually 11
i dont know why people dont think zegras can continue to grow as a player....he literally is a young version of patty kane and people on here are worried he doesnt play defense? on the rangers he'd be a PPG player at the least and our core with laf, fox, shesty, perrault, etc going forward would look amazing
Wrong.Anybody else???? Isolate Kreider - Zibanejad with anyone but Wheeler or Panarin and what do you get? Yeah same futility as what you showed for Kakko.
Or how about comparing Kakko with Chytil last season scoring per 60 to this 1.46 with Bros this season? I’m sure it will also closely match Lafreniere’s with Chytil. Seems the problem is not having Chytil (and Wheeler for Zibanejad).
I know I am in the minority, but I don't love power. I like him, but don't love him.